Studies Say This About Progressives....

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.
there you go with you 1,2,3 a,b,c bull shit ... then telling what liberals believe as if you really know ... I for one research everything that is said by republicans a democrats if it doesn't jive then I don't support it like the TPP don't support it now didn't support it before ... so when you learn, which we all know you can't learn, because you need to justify your Ignorance in defining who DEMS/LIBERALS are ... nobody any more takes you serious ... especially when you try to define what a liberals progressives is, do or are
 
You don't even need studies. This is the kind of insane nonsense that progressives say themselves - right out of their own mouths. They have a deep contempt for the U.S. Constitution (the highest law in the land) and advocate that we violate the highest law in the land...

"As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions." - Progressive professor LOUIS MICHAEL SIDEMAN

Lets Give Up On The Constitution

To which Steven Hayward had the greatest response ever:

As I sometimes like to say, “Our Constitution may not be perfect, but it’s better than the government we’ve got.”

A Liberal Comes Clean: We Hate the Constitution



And it isn't new...

Woodrow Wilson, Democrat Progressive..
“ the Constitution could be stripped off and thrown aside…”( Project MUSE - Journal of Policy History - Woodrow Wilson and a World Governed by Evolving Law Project MUSE Journals Journal of Policy History Volume 20, Number 1, 2008 http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/journal_of_policy_history/v020/20.1.thompson.html

And his view of the Constitution? ‘Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!"

Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands."’ 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (p. 139) see http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=317


Franklin Roosevelt, the same view.
 
We figured you out right away.

The little lib that cried Liar.
Ann Coulter makes things up to sell books, and you idiots believe it. She is probably a liberal pulling a hoax to sell books.


Ann COulter won't be shouted down by you lefties.

She speaks Truth to Power, and that is why you hate her.


And you still haven't given ONE example of her lying.

Have you looked and not been able to find one?
Saying Liberals do not read is not a lie? You are as stupid as Political Spice.








I asked you for an example of Ann Coulter lying.


Instead you misrepresent the OP, falsely claim it is a lie, and of course it was not said by Ann Coulter.


You failed completely.

You are a moron.

Would you like to try again, or would you like to implement standard lefty avoidance tactics?

oh puleeze. if her lips are moving, she's lying.

there are entire books written about her insanity and dishonesty. feel free to take the time to read occasionally. if that is too difficult, i'm sure you can get it in audio form.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MAH678/?tag=ff0d01-20



Then it shouldn't be very hard for you to post an example.

Give me a good one.

Don't play the bullshit Shotgun Logical Fallacy or Argument from VErbosity logical fallacy.


Pick one that you think is a strong example for discussion purposes, or admit that you just say shit, it don't mean nothing.
 
Ann Coulter makes things up to sell books, and you idiots believe it. She is probably a liberal pulling a hoax to sell books.


Ann COulter won't be shouted down by you lefties.

She speaks Truth to Power, and that is why you hate her.


And you still haven't given ONE example of her lying.

Have you looked and not been able to find one?
Saying Liberals do not read is not a lie? You are as stupid as Political Spice.








I asked you for an example of Ann Coulter lying.


Instead you misrepresent the OP, falsely claim it is a lie, and of course it was not said by Ann Coulter.


You failed completely.

You are a moron.

Would you like to try again, or would you like to implement standard lefty avoidance tactics?

oh puleeze. if her lips are moving, she's lying.

there are entire books written about her insanity and dishonesty. feel free to take the time to read occasionally. if that is too difficult, i'm sure you can get it in audio form.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MAH678/?tag=ff0d01-20



Then it shouldn't be very hard for you to post an example.

Give me a good one.

Don't play the bullshit Shotgun Logical Fallacy or Argument from VErbosity logical fallacy.


Pick one that you think is a strong example for discussion purposes, or admit that you just say shit, it don't mean nothing.

oh dear... i linked a book. now learn to use the google.

i'm not here to do your homework. i gave you a book to read. now read and learn
 
Ann COulter won't be shouted down by you lefties.

She speaks Truth to Power, and that is why you hate her.


And you still haven't given ONE example of her lying.

Have you looked and not been able to find one?
Saying Liberals do not read is not a lie? You are as stupid as Political Spice.








I asked you for an example of Ann Coulter lying.


Instead you misrepresent the OP, falsely claim it is a lie, and of course it was not said by Ann Coulter.


You failed completely.

You are a moron.

Would you like to try again, or would you like to implement standard lefty avoidance tactics?

oh puleeze. if her lips are moving, she's lying.

there are entire books written about her insanity and dishonesty. feel free to take the time to read occasionally. if that is too difficult, i'm sure you can get it in audio form.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MAH678/?tag=ff0d01-20



Then it shouldn't be very hard for you to post an example.

Give me a good one.

Don't play the bullshit Shotgun Logical Fallacy or Argument from VErbosity logical fallacy.


Pick one that you think is a strong example for discussion purposes, or admit that you just say shit, it don't mean nothing.

oh dear... i linked a book. now learn to use the google.

i'm not here to do your homework. i gave you a book to read. now read and learn


You made a claim, I asked you to support it.

YOu refuse to support your claim.

Or...

DId you go looking and realized that all those lies you loved to talk about with you lib buddies, were only "lies" in the sense that you didn't want them to be true?


You could try to find an example of her making a factual MISTAKE and then claim that that was a lie. I've seen libs do that with Ann before.
 
What defines a liberal from a conservative? I agree with PC that kids who have 2 biological parents seem to do better. I tend to be socially conservative. Yet I feel no threat from gay marriage as my marriage is solid. So I don't let minor little issues like that upset me as it doesn't affect me. Its not my job to police other peoples lives. Conservatives understand freedom and I agree with that stance. Yet I can't vote for Hillary and trump is out there somewhere. A voter in my shoes hasn't any choices.
It's a conservative thing....you wouldn't understand......
you don't know the meaning of conservative ... here you have a person who is running for president, donald trump... he has fucked so many people ...he has lied to you continuously in his speeches ...you accepted the fact that he bought the trump plaza hotel for 400 million dollars then let the bank repo it ... he bought his yacht for 29 million then let the bank repo it ... he built 3 casinos for 3 billion dollars then filed bankruptcy ... stiffing contractors and employee's ...started trump airlines never made a profit ,... the planes and helicopter were repo by citibank ... trump mortgage, trump vodka & trump steaks all went out of business with trump stiffing everybody for money owed ... Trump U bribed florida attorney general to not bring it to court... and you have the gaul to try and tell us how bad Hillary is??? its a conservative thing, really ??? I've never known conservative to stiff people for owing them money ... they sure know how to rack up a huge debt ... Oh we understand all right ... you have no idea what a conservative is
 
Last edited:
What defines a liberal from a conservative? I agree with PC that kids who have 2 biological parents seem to do better. I tend to be socially conservative. Yet I feel no threat from gay marriage as my marriage is solid. So I don't let minor little issues like that upset me as it doesn't affect me. Its not my job to police other peoples lives. Conservatives understand freedom and I agree with that stance. Yet I can't vote for Hillary and trump is out there somewhere. A voter in my shoes hasn't any choices.
It's a conservative thing....you wouldn't understand......
you don't know the meaning of conservative ... here you have a person who is running for president, donald trump... he has fucked so many people ...he has lied to you continuously in his speeches ...you accepted the fact that he bought the trump plaza hotel for 400 million dollars then let the bank repo it ... he bought his yacht for 29 million then let the bank repo it ... he built 3 casinos for 3 billion dollars then filed bankruptcy ... stiffing contractors and employee's ...started trump airlines never made a profit ,... the planes and helicopter were repo by citibank ... trump mortgage, trump vodka & trump steaks all went out of business with trump stiffing everybody for money owed ... Trump U bribed florida attorney general to not bring it to court... and you have the gaul to try and tell us how bad Hillary is??? its a conservative thing really ??? I've never known conservative to stiff people for owing them money ... they sure know how to rack up a huge debt ... Oh we understand all right ... you have no idea what a conservative is
Says the hitlery voter....how precious.....
 
Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

As usual Coulter is correct; at least in my experience. Conservatives are voracious readers, those on the right like books, and book sales confirm it. Those on the left tend to rely on YouTube and Comedy Central for information.

Squawk all you like, you know it's true just like the rest of us do.



Of course.


From the Liberal WaPo, and Über-Liberal Ezra Klein...
'
"Conservative books sell better than liberal books. Why?

By Ezra Klein August 22, 2012

The fine folks at Amazon have constructed a "heat map" showing the kinds of political books that people are buying across the country."
Conservative books sell better than liberal books. Why?


Do liberals read books, thank you for proving my point. It is obvious that reading conservative books makes one stupid.


If you imagine (I almost said 'think') that that proves your point, you are truly as stupid as most folks claim you are.
Most folks? You are obviously afraid to express an opinion without your idiot minions behind you.



"You are obviously afraid to express an opinion..."

1. Excellent....you've answered the one-question 'Insanity Questionnaire'.....'Does PoliticalChic ever provide her opinion on any and all topics?'

Now you get to monogram 'dunce' on all your shirts.




2. Queen Ann has a dozen best seller, all well researched and documented.

Now....to support your contumely (better look that up, you dunce), and to prove that your well-deserved reputation as a wind-bag is unworthy.....

....list which of her dozen scholarly tomes (better look that up) you've read.



Your attempts at posting have reached a new level of stupidity....amazing, even for you.
 
I notice that in neither of your posts did you state any 'lie.'


Where you saving up to list those of Obama?
Some people are intelligent enough to figure it out. Sorry that you cannot.


We figured you out right away.

The little lib that cried Liar.
Ann Coulter makes things up to sell books, and you idiots believe it. She is probably a liberal pulling a hoax to sell books.


Ann COulter won't be shouted down by you lefties.

She speaks Truth to Power, and that is why you hate her.


And you still haven't given ONE example of her lying.

Have you looked and not been able to find one?
Saying Liberals do not read is not a lie? You are as stupid as Political Spice.


Seems everyone is catching on to your......'aberrations.'
 
1. "....58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science?.....

I think I see the problem, conservatives don't believe in science

Somehow you seem to believe that science is linked to political convictions, weird. Gallileo was an evil liberal who dared to question the conservative teachings of the holy church, I guess if you were around at the time, you would be one of those calling for his execution.

:banana:

"....conservatives don't believe in science...."


Gads....this is sooooooo simple....almost as simple as you are.


Let's see what Liberals believe is "science."

Is Obama a Liberal.....and titular head of the LGBT Movement?
Did Obama select John Holdren as his SCIENCE ADVISER?????

  1. John Holdren- did I mention picked him to be ‘Science Czar’?- he claims 1 billion people dying due to global warming by 2020. Did the President’s Nominee for Science Advisor Say He Thinks A Billion People Are Gonna Die?
  2. Need further indicia of the mental outlook of this President Obama pick? “John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
3. Just one more factor one should consider before placing one’s faith in these ‘environmental scientists’…..remember their big project in the first half of the 20th century? For Progressives, it was eugenics; let’s just kill off the unworthy. See a pattern here?

4. What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, PaulEhrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/21/opinion/la-oe-harte-population-2011072


Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have.

That....and morons like you.
 
1. "....58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science?.....

I think I see the problem, conservatives don't believe in science

Somehow you seem to believe that science is linked to political convictions, weird. Gallileo was an evil liberal who dared to question the conservative teachings of the holy church, I guess if you were around at the time, you would be one of those calling for his execution.

:banana:

"....conservatives don't believe in science...."


Gads....this is sooooooo simple....almost as simple as you are.


Let's see what Liberals believe is "science."

Is Obama a Liberal.....and titular head of the LGBT Movement?
Did Obama select John Holdren as his SCIENCE ADVISER?????

  1. John Holdren- did I mention picked him to be ‘Science Czar’?- he claims 1 billion people dying due to global warming by 2020. Did the President’s Nominee for Science Advisor Say He Thinks A Billion People Are Gonna Die?
  2. Need further indicia of the mental outlook of this President Obama pick? “John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
3. Just one more factor one should consider before placing one’s faith in these ‘environmental scientists’…..remember their big project in the first half of the 20th century? For Progressives, it was eugenics; let’s just kill off the unworthy. See a pattern here?

4. What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, PaulEhrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.” http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/21/opinion/la-oe-harte-population-2011072


Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide. And that’s just what we have.

That....and morons like you.
can you believe how stupid she is ??? I for one can
 
What defines a liberal from a conservative? I agree with PC that kids who have 2 biological parents seem to do better. I tend to be socially conservative. Yet I feel no threat from gay marriage as my marriage is solid. So I don't let minor little issues like that upset me as it doesn't affect me. Its not my job to police other peoples lives. Conservatives understand freedom and I agree with that stance. Yet I can't vote for Hillary and trump is out there somewhere. A voter in my shoes hasn't any choices.
It's a conservative thing....you wouldn't understand......
you don't know the meaning of conservative ... here you have a person who is running for president, donald trump... he has fucked so many people ...he has lied to you continuously in his speeches ...you accepted the fact that he bought the trump plaza hotel for 400 million dollars then let the bank repo it ... he bought his yacht for 29 million then let the bank repo it ... he built 3 casinos for 3 billion dollars then filed bankruptcy ... stiffing contractors and employee's ...started trump airlines never made a profit ,... the planes and helicopter were repo by citibank ... trump mortgage, trump vodka & trump steaks all went out of business with trump stiffing everybody for money owed ... Trump U bribed florida attorney general to not bring it to court... and you have the gaul to try and tell us how bad Hillary is??? its a conservative thing really ??? I've never known conservative to stiff people for owing them money ... they sure know how to rack up a huge debt ... Oh we understand all right ... you have no idea what a conservative is
Says the hitlery voter....how precious.....
do you know how moronic you sound Owebo ??? apparently not ...
 
When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.
PC, it's not like you even demonstrate an understanding of the subjects you post. You copy and pasting some rightwing rag doesn't make us feel any different about you or the subject matter.

"....doesn't make us feel any different about you or the subject matter.'
Sooooo....this is your explanation for your abject ignorance????

Wasn't necessary.


Friendly advice: try to avoid using that "us" thing....
...it reveals your fear of standing up on your own two paws.
 
What defines a liberal from a conservative? I agree with PC that kids who have 2 biological parents seem to do better. I tend to be socially conservative. Yet I feel no threat from gay marriage as my marriage is solid. So I don't let minor little issues like that upset me as it doesn't affect me. Its not my job to police other peoples lives. Conservatives understand freedom and I agree with that stance. Yet I can't vote for Hillary and trump is out there somewhere. A voter in my shoes hasn't any choices.
It's a conservative thing....you wouldn't understand......
you don't know the meaning of conservative ... here you have a person who is running for president, donald trump... he has fucked so many people ...he has lied to you continuously in his speeches ...you accepted the fact that he bought the trump plaza hotel for 400 million dollars then let the bank repo it ... he bought his yacht for 29 million then let the bank repo it ... he built 3 casinos for 3 billion dollars then filed bankruptcy ... stiffing contractors and employee's ...started trump airlines never made a profit ,... the planes and helicopter were repo by citibank ... trump mortgage, trump vodka & trump steaks all went out of business with trump stiffing everybody for money owed ... Trump U bribed florida attorney general to not bring it to court... and you have the gaul to try and tell us how bad Hillary is??? its a conservative thing really ??? I've never known conservative to stiff people for owing them money ... they sure know how to rack up a huge debt ... Oh we understand all right ... you have no idea what a conservative is
Says the hitlery voter....how precious.....
do you know how moronic you sound Owebo ??? apparently not ...
You're not voting hitlery? Huh......:lol:
 
When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.
PC, it's not like you even demonstrate an understanding of the subjects you post. You copy and pasting some rightwing rag doesn't make us feel any different about you or the subject matter.

"....doesn't make us feel any different about you or the subject matter.'
Sooooo....this is your explanation for your abject ignorance????

Wasn't necessary.


Friendly advice: try to avoid using that "us" thing....
...it reveals your fear of standing up on your own two paws.
Like you did to me earlier.

I teach you something and you repeat it. Very good, you are able to learn.
 
When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

how cute. the cut and paste queen comes up with fake "studies".

:rofl:



I couldn't have asked for better proof of this:
"When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'"


Here you come to evince your fear that studied might make you jump in a way other than you usually jump when ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say."




Can you possibly be so stupid that you don't recognize how you support my thesis????

Yes, you can.
 
We figured you out right away.

The little lib that cried Liar.
Ann Coulter makes things up to sell books, and you idiots believe it. She is probably a liberal pulling a hoax to sell books.


Ann COulter won't be shouted down by you lefties.

She speaks Truth to Power, and that is why you hate her.


And you still haven't given ONE example of her lying.

Have you looked and not been able to find one?
Saying Liberals do not read is not a lie? You are as stupid as Political Spice.








I asked you for an example of Ann Coulter lying.


Instead you misrepresent the OP, falsely claim it is a lie, and of course it was not said by Ann Coulter.


You failed completely.

You are a moron.

Would you like to try again, or would you like to implement standard lefty avoidance tactics?

oh puleeze. if her lips are moving, she's lying.

there are entire books written about her insanity and dishonesty. feel free to take the time to read occasionally. if that is too difficult, i'm sure you can get it in audio form.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000MAH678/?tag=ff0d01-20


This is funny....I bet you haven't even read the book you ask others to check out!

BTW....the Liberal outlet Reuters fired him for publishing it.
"On Tuesday, Joe Maguire, one of two editors in charge of markets coverage at Reuters, handed his bosses the galleys of his new book, “Brainless: The Lies and Lunacy of Ann Coulter.” On Wednesday, Mr. Maguire discovered he would have plenty of free time to promote his book, which comes out this week. Neither side in this dispute would say that he was fired."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/business/media/09reuters.html?_r=0




Queen Ann has a dozen best seller, all well researched and documented.


Now....to support your contumely (better look that up, you dunce), and to prove that your well-deserved reputation as a wind-bag is unworthy.....

....list which of her dozen scholarly tomes (better look that up) you've read.

If none, you can change your avi to 'Windbag'....m'kay?



Really.....how simple has it always been to eviscerate our little Jill?

Always.
 
What defines a liberal from a conservative? I agree with PC that kids who have 2 biological parents seem to do better. I tend to be socially conservative. Yet I feel no threat from gay marriage as my marriage is solid. So I don't let minor little issues like that upset me as it doesn't affect me. Its not my job to police other peoples lives. Conservatives understand freedom and I agree with that stance. Yet I can't vote for Hillary and trump is out there somewhere. A voter in my shoes hasn't any choices.



"I agree with PC..."


NO!!!!



Based on the above I must consider changing my every view.
 

Forum List

Back
Top