BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
The number of troops they asked for was the number they already had. 2500. Furthermore the generals testified that when the truce with the Taliban was lifted those troops would be at high risk and any attack on them would result in a necessary increase in force or more boots on the ground. There are 38 provinces in Afghanistan and we were spread pretty thin.So decrepit Joe Biden gave his generals two choices, both of which were horrible, to work from?
![]()
Contradicting Biden, top generals say they recommended a small force stay in Afghanistan
Biden has received fierce criticism over his administration’s handling of the withdrawal and failure to predict the Taliban’s quick return to power.www.nbcnews.com
He had other options. You, and Joe, just choose to ignore them. In fact you choose to lie about the options.
Leaving behind billions of dollars of advanced arms for the Taliban to take over and over 9,000 Americans
left behind before Joe "turned the page" on fellow citizens was not a fait accompli until Biden made it so
himself!
Of course you also think shooting unarmed 1/6 demonstrators was acceptable, even preferable,
government policy. So who is surprised by your Neanderthal stances?
Why was the troop level so low? Why did we reduce it so much right before Joey took office?
So we should have ordered our allies to destroy the equipment we gave them to defend themselves? Or should we have just blown all that up with them in it. With friends like you, no wonder they said ..... nope.....adios.