j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
I crush you with facts and evidence and you have no response at all except childish name calling.Those are just empty words typed on the page with no factual merit at all.The entire world knows the election was stolen. Your boy Finger Raping Joe is about 5 brain cells away from full blown dementia.FREE SPEACH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO YELL FIRE IN A CROWDED MOVIE THEATER AND CLAIM INNOCENCE WHEN THERE IS AN ENSUING PANIC...I don't think they've addressed the five core questions the Dems asked yesterday.
- Why did President Trump not tell his supporters to stop the attack on the Capitol as soon as he learned of it?
- Why did President Trump do nothing to stop the attack for at least two hours after the attack began?
- As our constitutional commander-in-chief, why did he do nothing to send help to our overwhelmed and besieged law enforcement officers for at least two hours…after the attack began?
- Why did President Trump—not at any point that day—condemn the violent insurrection and the insurrectionists?
- If a president incited a violent insurrection against our government, would that be a high crime and misdemeanor? Can we all agree at least on that?
- Why did President Trump not tell his supporters to stop the attack on the Capitol as soon as he learned of it? Who knows, is that illegal and impeachable? (ans; NO)
- Why did President Trump do nothing to stop the attack for at least two hours after the attack began?Who knows, is that illegal and impeachable? (ans; NO)
- As our constitutional commander-in-chief, why did he do nothing to send help to our overwhelmed and besieged law enforcement officers for at least two hours…after the attack began? Who knows, is that illegal and impeachable? (ans; NO)
- Why did President Trump—not at any point that day—condemn the violent insurrection and the insurrectionists?Who knows, is that illegal and impeachable? (ans; NO)
- If a president incited a violent insurrection against our government, would that be a high crime and misdemeanor? Can we all agree at least on that? A hypothetical question that is totally irrelevant to the trial for impeachment we're witnessing. An actual trial, with actual evidence, and actual legal definitons, such as 1st Amendment free speech rights.
The president of the US, does not get to spread lies about election fraud that never happened. The insurrection was based on lies, just like Mitch McConell said.
And when you put all the events together in totally Trump is 100% guilty, and not stopping the insurrection is just one more example of Trump's guilt.
Anybody can do that:
2+2 = 37
The Earth is flat
The sky is pink
"we're rounding the curve"
"We won in a landslide"
"This is nothing it will all go away."
See in the real world, the big boy world you need these things called facts and evidence. When every court has ruled against Trump and his fake election fraud lies, with AG Barr and all election officials saying no fraud... There is no fraud.
Repeating a lie doesn't make it true.
You dumb fucks are so gullible. You fuckin retards will believe any lie Trump tells you.
You idiots believed Pizzagate. You idiots believe "we're rounding the curve" as cases were soaring...
If Trump or Alex Jones told you HRC was an alien life-form from another galaxy trying to eat the brains of all people on earth you dumb fucking retards would believe it, that's how stupid and gullible you are.
LOL....Settle down there Eugene....Face it, liberals today are just the spoiled children that never grew up....They were never told no as children, and were fed lies their whole lives that everything was unicorns, and lolipops....Grow up dumbass.
You have nothing to say in rebuttal of my statements...
Well, let's see, what would you like me to rebutt? You calling me a "dumbass"? Or, the spittal drooling rant about Alex Jones something or another? Get a grip loser....