Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you wanted to follow The Constitution you would not be waging war on it and on the unique value of Citizenship and the role it plays in a Constitutional Republic.
Not really.
Why do you want to devalue Citizenship and cheat in elections and have unfair representation in Congress and The Electoral College?
Why do you want to steal Federal Tax Dollars from Poor States?
Why do you hate The Poor?
I want to follow the Constitution.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
I am the one wanting to follow it, you are the one attacking it.
Do try and keep up.
the basis of representation therein shall be reduced
What's wrong, can't you read?
.
your focus is on the wrong part of section 2
It's the part that is applicable to the discussion. You try to ignore it because it doesn't support your propaganda, but it's there for all to read.
.
It is not applicable to the discussion as it deals with what happens to states if they deny or abridge the rights of male citizens to vote (since then only males could vote).
Those terms have been altered by subsequent Amendments, but the concept is still valid and has never been changed.
.
And this has never changed either and is still valid today...yet you want to ignore it...
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.
the basis of representation therein shall be reduced
What's wrong, can't you read?
.
your focus is on the wrong part of section 2
It's the part that is applicable to the discussion. You try to ignore it because it doesn't support your propaganda, but it's there for all to read.
.
It is not applicable to the discussion as it deals with what happens to states if they deny or abridge the rights of male citizens to vote (since then only males could vote).
Those terms have been altered by subsequent Amendments, but the concept is still valid and has never been changed.
.
And this has never changed either and is still valid today...yet you want to ignore it...
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.
Again, not really. You are avoiding entirely discussions about my right to fair and equal representation in Government and advocating Fraud and Theft and Disenfranchisement to your benefit and at my expense.If you wanted to follow The Constitution you would not be waging war on it and on the unique value of Citizenship and the role it plays in a Constitutional Republic.
Not really.
Why do you want to devalue Citizenship and cheat in elections and have unfair representation in Congress and The Electoral College?
Why do you want to steal Federal Tax Dollars from Poor States?
Why do you hate The Poor?
I want to follow the Constitution.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
I am the one wanting to follow it, you are the one attacking it.
Do try and keep up.
A lot of questions are asked once or twice and then not asked again. A couple times in the 1800's they asked what country they were born in. Once they asked women how many children they had birthed and how many were living (I think that was in the early 1900's). They have always asked occupation.its clear to everyone that the cheating republicans wanted to ace out Hispanics from the census count .
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/06/27/politics/census-supreme-court/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
Is that the reason it was removed from the census in 1950?
Including giving them way more money than they put inBut they weaseled out of this by removing the Citizenship question a few years ago.
Since then the Blue States have been sticking it to The Red States.
This is the Sole Purpose Of Sanctuary Status.
This is why they are trying to get an Activist Judge to Overturn this Legal Precedent!
Selective quotes, how commie of you. And now as they say for the rest of the story.
14th Amendment Section 2
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Simple concept, if you're not a citizen you can't vote and should not be counted for representation.
.
I will give you the same advice I gave the other wingnuts. Go back and get your GED and learn what the word "BUT" is used for in a paragraph.
The first sentence says to count everyone in the state.
The "BUT" sentences say that criminals and non-citizens, i.e. "NON-VOTERS" are reduced from that total number.
Again, not really. You are avoiding entirely discussions about my right to fair and equal representation in Government and advocating Fraud and Theft and Disenfranchisement to your benefit and at my expense.If you wanted to follow The Constitution you would not be waging war on it and on the unique value of Citizenship and the role it plays in a Constitutional Republic.
Not really.
Why do you want to devalue Citizenship and cheat in elections and have unfair representation in Congress and The Electoral College?
Why do you want to steal Federal Tax Dollars from Poor States?
Why do you hate The Poor?
I want to follow the Constitution.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
I am the one wanting to follow it, you are the one attacking it.
Do try and keep up.
Your argument about fair and equal representation in Government and advocating Fraud and Theft and Disenfranchisement is a false argument and thus needs no attention.
Again, if you think that the 14th Amendment is unfair and needs to be changed, there is a method for doing so. The fact you feel it is unfair does not give you the right to ignore it.
Which is addressed by “Taxation Without Representation
Actually it is a Constitutional Argument about Disenfranchisement of The American Citizen.
Again, not really. You are avoiding entirely discussions about my right to fair and equal representation in Government and advocating Fraud and Theft and Disenfranchisement to your benefit and at my expense.If you wanted to follow The Constitution you would not be waging war on it and on the unique value of Citizenship and the role it plays in a Constitutional Republic.
I want to follow the Constitution.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
I am the one wanting to follow it, you are the one attacking it.
Do try and keep up.
Your argument about fair and equal representation in Government and advocating Fraud and Theft and Disenfranchisement is a false argument and thus needs no attention.
Again, if you think that the 14th Amendment is unfair and needs to be changed, there is a method for doing so. The fact you feel it is unfair does not give you the right to ignore it.
This thread is proof that The Courts will be forced to allow The Legal Precedent of Citizenship Status questions in The Census to be added back in.
They have no choice due To Disenfranchisement and questions of Apportionment of Representatives & Federal
Tax Dollars and the Standard Of Taxation Without Representation which we are guaranteed to be protected from.
Blocking such a question is Unconstitutional,
A lot of questions are asked once or twice and then not asked again. A couple times in the 1800's they asked what country they were born in. Once they asked women how many children they had birthed and how many were living (I think that was in the early 1900's). They have always asked occupation.its clear to everyone that the cheating republicans wanted to ace out Hispanics from the census count .
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/06/27/politics/census-supreme-court/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
Is that the reason it was removed from the census in 1950?
Idiot?its clear to everyone that the cheating republicans wanted to ace out Hispanics from the census count .
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/06/27/politics/census-supreme-court/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
How is it racist? You realize what white europeans who are not citizens yet, would answer the same question.
You idiots are so disgustingly stupid, you can't even make a rational argument.
Insult, dead giveaway for zero college
Why are you waging War on American Citizens and American Citizenship?This thread is proof that The Courts will be forced to allow The Legal Precedent of Citizenship Status questions in The Census to be added back in.
They have no choice due To Disenfranchisement and questions of Apportionment of Representatives & Federal
Tax Dollars and the Standard Of Taxation Without Representation which we are guaranteed to be protected from.
Blocking such a question is Unconstitutional,
You willing to wager your very existence on this forum over that happening?
Why are you waging War on American Citizens and American Citizenship?This thread is proof that The Courts will be forced to allow The Legal Precedent of Citizenship Status questions in The Census to be added back in.
They have no choice due To Disenfranchisement and questions of Apportionment of Representatives & Federal
Tax Dollars and the Standard Of Taxation Without Representation which we are guaranteed to be protected from.
Blocking such a question is Unconstitutional,
You willing to wager your very existence on this forum over that happening?
Why do you think it is ok for Sanctuary States to Defraud and Steal From The Voters of Other States in The Union?
Yes, I am betting Donald Trump gets Re-elected in a landslide in 2020, because The Democrat Party has not DONE DICK for The American People and in fact is showing itself to be a Treacherous, Traitorous, Immoral, Treasonous, Seditious Den of Vipers Hell Bent on Destroying our National Sovereignty, Our Republic, and Usurping The Rights of American Citizens and Voters who they daily work to Disenfranchise.
No--I skipped some pages. I'll go look for it.A lot of questions are asked once or twice and then not asked again. A couple times in the 1800's they asked what country they were born in. Once they asked women how many children they had birthed and how many were living (I think that was in the early 1900's). They have always asked occupation.its clear to everyone that the cheating republicans wanted to ace out Hispanics from the census count .
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/06/27/politics/census-supreme-court/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
Is that the reason it was removed from the census in 1950?
Did you happen to read the link I provided?
So in other you refuse to address why you are opposed to the Government gathering data on Non-Citizens so that they can formulate a Bi-Partisan Plan to Resolve The Illegal Immigration Crisis, and the effect that has on Our Democratic Republic especially with respect to Unfair and Fraudulent Apportionment of Federal Dollars and Representatives for The States.Why are you waging War on American Citizens and American Citizenship?This thread is proof that The Courts will be forced to allow The Legal Precedent of Citizenship Status questions in The Census to be added back in.
They have no choice due To Disenfranchisement and questions of Apportionment of Representatives & Federal
Tax Dollars and the Standard Of Taxation Without Representation which we are guaranteed to be protected from.
Blocking such a question is Unconstitutional,
You willing to wager your very existence on this forum over that happening?
Why do you think it is ok for Sanctuary States to Defraud and Steal From The Voters of Other States in The Union?
Yes, I am betting Donald Trump gets Re-elected in a landslide in 2020, because The Democrat Party has not DONE DICK for The American People and in fact is showing itself to be a Treacherous, Traitorous, Immoral, Treasonous, Seditious Den of Vipers Hell Bent on Destroying our National Sovereignty, Our Republic, and Usurping The Rights of American Citizens and Voters who they daily work to Disenfranchise.
I accept your surrender.
Thanks
So in other you refuse to address why you are opposed to the Government gathering data on Non-Citizens so that they can formulate a Bi-Partisan Plan to Resolve The Illegal Immigration Crisis, and the effect that has on Our Democratic Republic especially with respect to Unfair and Fraudulent Apportionment of Federal Dollars and Representatives for The States.
Your Surrender is Accepted.
You have refused to answer a single question I posed to you.
It took me half the thread just to get you to admit what "Foreigner Not Naturalized" meant and what the full meaning and weight of what that Legal Term and Precedent meant within the Context of this topic.
No, Sir, The SOUTH will Not Rise Again.
Neither will you.
Umm dim wit.So in other you refuse to address why you are opposed to the Government gathering data on Non-Citizens so that they can formulate a Bi-Partisan Plan to Resolve The Illegal Immigration Crisis, and the effect that has on Our Democratic Republic especially with respect to Unfair and Fraudulent Apportionment of Federal Dollars and Representatives for The States.
Your Surrender is Accepted.
You have refused to answer a single question I posed to you.
It took me half the thread just to get you to admit what "Foreigner Not Naturalized" meant and what the full meaning and weight of what that Legal Term and Precedent meant within the Context of this topic.
No, Sir, The SOUTH will Not Rise Again.
Neither will you.
I am not opposed to the government gathering data on non-citizens. Why do you feel the need to lie about me?
Why are you opposed to the Constitution?
I will tell you the same thing I tell your mirror image wingnuts on the left when they try and go around the 2nd...
just because you do not like means you can ignore it.
The USSC is simply wrong. Why should US citizens have their votes and congressional representation diminished by the fucking illegals? I hope Trump keeps fighting until fucking Roberts gets his head out of his ass.
