Fenton Lum
Gold Member
- May 7, 2016
- 22,735
- 1,442
They have guns mod, aplenty.No one's coming for my guns, been 6 decades now.
You must not live in DC, CA, HI, NY, NJ, or IL.
![550px-World_map_of_civilian_gun_ownership_-_2nd_color_scheme.svg.png](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/World_map_of_civilian_gun_ownership_-_2nd_color_scheme.svg/550px-World_map_of_civilian_gun_ownership_-_2nd_color_scheme.svg.png)
Estimated number of guns per capita by country - Wikipedia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have guns mod, aplenty.No one's coming for my guns, been 6 decades now.
You must not live in DC, CA, HI, NY, NJ, or IL.
Nah, I got 'em right here, all nice and shiney. Wayne can go fuck hisseph. I was an NRA member until they decided to become a political corporate hack organization.No one's coming for my guns, been 6 decades now.
They just did...the 4th Circuit Court of appeals just ruled against you and your guns......
and the only reason you still have guns today.....the NRA, the 2nd Amendment Foundation and Gun owners of America....and all of their dues paying supporters...
How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut jobI was an NRA member
Yeah sure you were..#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!
Wikipedia? LOL.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
Wikipedia? LOL.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.Wikipedia? LOL.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.Wikipedia? LOL.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
lol
If they read an astronomy magazine or article they would expect the right terminology, not street lingo. That's a fact, with you or without you.Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.Wikipedia? LOL.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
lol
There are millions of people with telescopes. Most of them go out from time to time to look at the sky. Why don't most astronomy articles have nothing but dry physics language in it?
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said that his editor told him that for every math formula you cut your readers in half. Because most people who read that book won't be physics majors. They'll be curious people who want to learn but have no foundation of knowledge for the physics.
The people can understand Gravity. They can't follow the symbols used in Advanced Mathmatics. If the Altman's explanation makes sense then the people will accept what the expert says the math represents.
Thankfully the science people in question aren't as big of a jackass as you are. They don't mind explaining it in Everyman language. If they did then far more people would reject the information from the experts.
So far you have never given me reason to regret the label I put on you. You remain an unequaled jackass.
If they read an astronomy magazine or article they would expect the right terminology, not street lingo. That's a fact, with you or without you.Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.Wikipedia? LOL.Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
lol
There are millions of people with telescopes. Most of them go out from time to time to look at the sky. Why don't most astronomy articles have nothing but dry physics language in it?
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said that his editor told him that for every math formula you cut your readers in half. Because most people who read that book won't be physics majors. They'll be curious people who want to learn but have no foundation of knowledge for the physics.
The people can understand Gravity. They can't follow the symbols used in Advanced Mathmatics. If the Altman's explanation makes sense then the people will accept what the expert says the math represents.
Thankfully the science people in question aren't as big of a jackass as you are. They don't mind explaining it in Everyman language. If they did then far more people would reject the information from the experts.
So far you have never given me reason to regret the label I put on you. You remain an unequaled jackass.
A magazine and a clip are so different that to confuse the two proves ignorance of a major type.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
A magazine and a clip are so different that to confuse the two proves ignorance of a major type.On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Muzzle energy - Wikipedia
Force as used in the sentence is more accurate than inaccurate. The math is right.
The force that the bullet carries is the effect of kinetic energy. nitpicking it is like someone complaining that the proper term is magazine not clip. Or objecting that it is a revolver and not a pistol.
You're lost. You are thinking that using proper terminology is akin to explaining science in layman's terms.If they read an astronomy magazine or article they would expect the right terminology, not street lingo. That's a fact, with you or without you.Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.Wikipedia? LOL.
There is a difference between a magazine and a clip. Same reason we don't call the grip a handle. Being stubborn about ignorance is no virtue.
The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
lol
There are millions of people with telescopes. Most of them go out from time to time to look at the sky. Why don't most astronomy articles have nothing but dry physics language in it?
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said that his editor told him that for every math formula you cut your readers in half. Because most people who read that book won't be physics majors. They'll be curious people who want to learn but have no foundation of knowledge for the physics.
The people can understand Gravity. They can't follow the symbols used in Advanced Mathmatics. If the Altman's explanation makes sense then the people will accept what the expert says the math represents.
Thankfully the science people in question aren't as big of a jackass as you are. They don't mind explaining it in Everyman language. If they did then far more people would reject the information from the experts.
So far you have never given me reason to regret the label I put on you. You remain an unequaled jackass.
Yeah. Describing Space-Time as a rubber sheet stretched across a frame and black holes which is not the proper term as small heavy weights is the right terminology. Lol.
[
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said .
You're lost. You are thinking that using proper terminology is akin to explaining science in layman's terms.If they read an astronomy magazine or article they would expect the right terminology, not street lingo. That's a fact, with you or without you.Stupid comment. People read enthusiast magazines and articles to LEARN.The article as most in topical magazines are not written for the anal. They are written for the average person with amateur level knowledge.
.
lol
There are millions of people with telescopes. Most of them go out from time to time to look at the sky. Why don't most astronomy articles have nothing but dry physics language in it?
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said that his editor told him that for every math formula you cut your readers in half. Because most people who read that book won't be physics majors. They'll be curious people who want to learn but have no foundation of knowledge for the physics.
The people can understand Gravity. They can't follow the symbols used in Advanced Mathmatics. If the Altman's explanation makes sense then the people will accept what the expert says the math represents.
Thankfully the science people in question aren't as big of a jackass as you are. They don't mind explaining it in Everyman language. If they did then far more people would reject the information from the experts.
So far you have never given me reason to regret the label I put on you. You remain an unequaled jackass.
Yeah. Describing Space-Time as a rubber sheet stretched across a frame and black holes which is not the proper term as small heavy weights is the right terminology. Lol.
[
In the book Brief History of Time Steven Hawking said .
HAHAHA. You have just proved you're a science illiterate who thinks reading "Physics for Poets" books makes him an expert on physics.
On page 21 of the april 2017 issue their handguns editor Patrick Sweeney says
"Force, in the world of physics, is one half the mass of the object times the square of the velocity"
HAHAHA Everyone who went thru HS physics knows that is the definition of kinetic energy and not at all the same as force!!!
Really a bonehead blunder and they should fire the dried-up old geezer.
Yet even in science the slang terms become commonplace.
You can be assured that old geezer forget ten times more than you'll ever know and he's still a hundred times smarter.
No one's coming for my guns, been 6 decades now.
No one's coming for my guns, been 6 decades now.
You must not live in DC, CA, HI, NY, NJ, or IL.