OP expresses a faulty logic by inserting something that doesn't exist, not surprising for a science of non-existent entities such as religion. As Seidel states,A win for religious freedom. For you Constitutional remedial learners: there is no "separation of church and state" in the Constitution. The 1st Amendment says ONLY that Congress cannot establish a state religion, as in the Church of England. That's it.
Supreme Court Sides With Coach Over Prayers at the 50-Yard Line (Published 2022)
Joseph Kennedy, a former high school football coach in Bremerton, Wash., had a constitutional right to pray on the field after his team’s games, the justices ruled.www.nytimes.com
High school football coach scores big win at Supreme Court over post-game prayer
The Supreme Court ruled that a school district violeted high school football coach Joe Kennedy's First Amendment rights by firing him for saying on-field prayers after games.www.foxnews.com
'One's personal theistic beliefs do not "own" the other ideas generated by one's mind. By that same logic, blue jeans would be "Jewish Blue Jeans" because the inventors of the pants, Jacob W. Davis and Levi Straus, happened to be Jewish. If we follow this illogic - that a person's religion informs all their other ideas - why limit it to religion? Why not argue that America is a nation of hair-powderers and wig-wearers?
And why limit the logic to suggesting that religion informs the nation? Why not claim that the founders built a Christian outhouse or planted a Judeo-Christian vegetable garden? Of course, designing a nation is different from designing a pair of jeans, but religion cannot be assumed to influence either.
Those religious beliefs must be examined and compared against the principles that informed the design. To argue that the founders were Christian is irrelevant because it does not answer the ultimate question about Christianity's influence on America's founding. And even if the founders were all Christian and this fallacious logic held, we (know [italics]) that they never cited biblical principles during the constitutional convention and ramifications, as we'll see in Chapter Six.
The religious faith of the founders is irrelevant for another reason: they made it irrelevant when they erected a "wall of separation" between religion and government they created (Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association, 1 January 1802). The Constitution deliberately rejects commingling religion and government. The Constitution severed religion's power from the government to limit the danger it would pose; separates church and state; prohibits a religious test for public office; and, as Alexander Hamilton put it, gives the president "no particle of spiritual jurisdiction." (Hamilton, The Federalist no. 69).'
(The Founding Myth, pp. 31-2)