Sydney Powell's "Excuse" puts the BIG LIE of election fraud to rest...

[candycorn]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

Cite?

It's a breach of the 14th Amendment.

Quote the germane part of the amendment, please.

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

Who was "not protected" if you're going to quote that part of the amendment?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

It doesn’t say that. It says the manner of the election is determined by the legislature. That’s not the same thing.

But it is the same thing. Read what you wrote.
No honest person would accept the numbers of this election. An audit was warranted but not granted due to bias and/or fear of reprisal.
Ox-Bow election.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

The US Supreme court ruled everything was all gravy, case closed...

Besides that, even if they USC didn't rule properly that still doesn't change anything at all in anyway...

The scotus mostly did a Pontius Pilate.
Thomas and Alito questioned the integrity of this election.
Anyone who doesn’t doubt the veracity of this election is dishonest.

 

[munkle]

I'm not really a political party joiner of any kind but could these Democrats be anymore despicable?

Sidney Powell Saying “Crime of the Century” Obviously Not a “Fact,” How the Washington Post Lied About Powell

As if the Left and its disregard for all truth couldn’t already be more despicable, Washington Post commits an egregious act of dishonesty which would make even Joseph Goebbels blush. Washi…

evidence2020.wordpress.com

She claimed that she had evidence that the election result was the “greatest crime of the century if not the life of the world.”

Reasonable people understand that the “language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes … is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.”

 

[colfax_m]

Oh yea it does. Plenary power belongs to State legislatures.

I wouldn't say Plenary power. The constitution makes stipulations about what legislatures can and can't do. After all, the constitution guarantees all states will have a republican form of government.

The constitution says states have the power to determine the manner of appointment of their electors. That word "manner" means a lot, but it doesn't mean that every single little detail about how an election is run belongs to the state legislature.

You do not need to say it. The Constitution does.

but it doesn't mean that every single little detail about how an election is run belongs to the state legislature.

A judge in Arizona says differently. He/she said the legislature should and can see everything. An article has been posted proving that.

Sounds like you’re mixing issues. Not sure what “seeing” has to do with anything although my statement could be interpreted that way.

What I was trying to say is that local election boards and state administrations have to make some decisions about election details. Not everything is ever going to be decided by legislatures.

 

[colfax_m]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

It doesn’t say that. It says the manner of the election is determined by the legislature. That’s not the same thing.

But it is the same thing. Read what you wrote.
No honest person would accept the numbers of this election. An audit was warranted but not granted due to bias and/or fear of reprisal.
Ox-Bow election.

It’s not. Method and means are not quite the same.

The numbers are legitimate. The people who don’t want to accept them merely can’t come to terms with losing.

 

[daveman]

Gullible leftists eagerly swallowed it whole without question.

 

[beautress]

I'm not really a political party joiner of any kind but could these Democrats be anymore despicable?

Sidney Powell Saying “Crime of the Century” Obviously Not a “Fact,” How the Washington Post Lied About Powell

As if the Left and its disregard for all truth couldn’t already be more despicable, Washington Post commits an egregious act of dishonesty which would make even Joseph Goebbels blush. Washi…

evidence2020.wordpress.com

She claimed that she had evidence that the election result was the “greatest crime of the century if not the life of the world.”

Reasonable people understand that the “language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes … is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.”

Sidney Powell spoke as truthfully as she could. The overbearing leftists did all they could to humiliate her, President Trump, his staff, and everyone who voted for him.
It's not good in this nation when bad people tell lies and reward themselves with gold pens.

 

[rightwinger]

At times Powell may have been speaking rhetorically or generically.

I think the election may have been stolen
It s possible Dominion voting machines could be hacked
Protected speech

But Sidney Powell made specific allegations against Dominion and stated them as facts.

Dominion voting machines are changing votes
Dominion was paid by Hugo Chavez to fix elections

Neither is true and she knew it.

She will lose Bigly and pay everything she has

 

[my2¢]

Her defense based on the stance that any reasonable person would know she's full of crap isn't much of a defense. It sure doesn't say much for those here critical of Dominion these past months. Pretty much she's calling you idiots. Can't disagree much with her there.

Dominion-DDC-Defs-MTD v17.pdf (courtlistener.com)

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Oh yea it does. Plenary power belongs to State legislatures.

I wouldn't say Plenary power. The constitution makes stipulations about what legislatures can and can't do. After all, the constitution guarantees all states will have a republican form of government.

The constitution says states have the power to determine the manner of appointment of their electors. That word "manner" means a lot, but it doesn't mean that every single little detail about how an election is run belongs to the state legislature.

You do not need to say it. The Constitution does.

but it doesn't mean that every single little detail about how an election is run belongs to the state legislature.

A judge in Arizona says differently. He/she said the legislature should and can see everything. An article has been posted proving that.

Sounds like you’re mixing issues. Not sure what “seeing” has to do with anything although my statement could be interpreted that way.

What I was trying to say is that local election boards and state administrations have to make some decisions about election details. Not everything is ever going to be decided by legislatures.

It can’t be changed per national elections without the legislature.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

It doesn’t say that. It says the manner of the election is determined by the legislature. That’s not the same thing.

But it is the same thing. Read what you wrote.
No honest person would accept the numbers of this election. An audit was warranted but not granted due to bias and/or fear of reprisal.
Ox-Bow election.

It’s not. Method and means are not quite the same.

The numbers are legitimate. The people who don’t want to accept them merely can’t come to terms with losing.

The numbers are suspicious to say the least. Only dishonest people believe otherwise.

 

[colfax_m]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

It doesn’t say that. It says the manner of the election is determined by the legislature. That’s not the same thing.

But it is the same thing. Read what you wrote.
No honest person would accept the numbers of this election. An audit was warranted but not granted due to bias and/or fear of reprisal.
Ox-Bow election.

It’s not. Method and means are not quite the same.

The numbers are legitimate. The people who don’t want to accept them merely can’t come to terms with losing.

The numbers are suspicious to say the least. Only dishonest people believe otherwise.

When you decided before the election that Trump won, then any number that doesn’t result in that outcome would seem suspicious.

That doesn’t mean it is.

 

[my2¢]

But Sidney Powell made specific allegations against Dominion and stated them as facts.

And it can be shown that the consequences of her lies have already caused damage to Dominion's business:

The Stark County Board of Elections accused county commissioners of "using many
specious and self-serving statements" and appearing to be influenced by debunked
conspiracy theories when the commissioners voted to reject funding the purchase
of Dominion voting machines.

The elections board indicated it is considering legal action against
commissioners' decision on Wednesday.​

Stark Board of Elections may file lawsuit over Dominion machine decision (cantonrep.com)

 

[Lesh]

These Trump Humpers think they DESERVE to have Trump win so any result other than that HAS to be false.

total delusion

And Sidney Kraken put the nail in that

 

[Toro]

I'm not really a political party joiner of any kind but could these Democrats be anymore despicable?

Sidney Powell Saying “Crime of the Century” Obviously Not a “Fact,” How the Washington Post Lied About Powell

As if the Left and its disregard for all truth couldn’t already be more despicable, Washington Post commits an egregious act of dishonesty which would make even Joseph Goebbels blush. Washi…

evidence2020.wordpress.com

She claimed that she had evidence that the election result was the “greatest crime of the century if not the life of the world.”

Reasonable people understand that the “language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes … is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.”

she's arguing that trump rubes are dumb trump rubes

and here you are, proving she's exactly correct

lol

 

[Chillicothe]

Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year..........Only dishonest people believe otherwise.

..................................................

T'is well plowed ground, poster Markwees.

But, if you wanna saddle that worn horse up again......let's go.
Saddle up.

You say---'left wing judges refused, non-left wing judge were fearful'.
OK.
We say, -------Prove it.

Don't just come on to a internet chatroom under a fake name and whine anonymously.
So prove it.
Show us all that you know what you are talking about.

Or, better yet, show us that you have done something about it. Gone to the FBI. Or even to your state's election officials.
If you haven't done that.....well, you ain't a real patriotic American.
After all, you know it was crooked but are timid to go to bat for America and for Don Trump?

Some may say.

 

[Lesh]

Her defense based on the stance that any reasonable person would know she's full of crap isn't much of a defense. It sure doesn't say much for those here critical of Dominion these past months. Pretty much she's calling you idiots. Can't disagree much with her there.

Dominion-DDC-Defs-MTD v17.pdf (courtlistener.com)

And it destroys the lie that the election was stolen

 

[Lastamender]

At times Powell may have been speaking rhetorically or generically.

I think the election may have been stolen
It s possible Dominion voting machines could be hacked
Protected speech

But Sidney Powell made specific allegations against Dominion and stated them as facts.

Dominion voting machines are changing votes
Dominion was paid by Hugo Chavez to fix elections

Neither is true and she knew it.

She will lose Bigly and pay everything she has

Powell knows there was fraud so does 100 million or more Americans.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

And there were hundreds of them.

Over 1,500 sworn eyewitness accounts.

Did y’all ever bother to read any of them? They’re worse than you think. Few of them actually allege fraud. Mostly just who assume there was fraud because they didn’t understand what was going on.

The fact that there were so many of these is actually really bad given how few are relevant or true. It shows that allegations of fraud aren’t based on reality, but based on the desire to fulfill a narrative they were coached to believe before the election even happened.

2 months later and they still have not presented any real and credible evidence of fraud.

These dumb fucks will believe any lie Trump tells them.
They believed Pizza-gate, enough said...

You can say this until you are blue in the face, but until people are allowed to check signatures, hold a full audit, checknames to register, check addresses etc I will never accept the legitimacy of this election.
If it was so clean, Big Tech would not be banning people who post proof and evidence.