Syria, Iran Warn Israel

Bibi himself thinks Assad needs to go and yes---Israel would love to see Irans nukes blown sky high

Bibi thinks Assad should go? Who would replace him then? Bibi doesn't give a Crap about what he does to his own people nor should he.

" Israel would love to see Iran nuked blown sky high" is very different from a Pro Palestinian Psycho stating that if we attack Syria it's under " orders" from Israel so they can initiate a War with Iran. You don't see the difference? Birds of a feather flock together. All Pro Palestinians march to the same beat. :cuckoo:

Mideast Dispatch Archive: Peres tells Arab media “Assad must go,” and Netanyahu again hints at it too
S
So what? That has nothing to do with the claim that the US will " take its orders" from Israel to bomb Syria so they can bomb Iran Typical mentally challenged Pro Palestinian mentality
 
Bibi thinks Assad should go? Who would replace him then? Bibi doesn't give a Crap about what he does to his own people nor should he.

" Israel would love to see Iran nuked blown sky high" is very different from a Pro Palestinian Psycho stating that if we attack Syria it's under " orders" from Israel so they can initiate a War with Iran. You don't see the difference? Birds of a feather flock together. All Pro Palestinians march to the same beat. :cuckoo:

Mideast Dispatch Archive: Peres tells Arab media “Assad must go,” and Netanyahu again hints at it too
S
So what? That has nothing to do with the claim that the US will " take its orders" from Israel to bomb Syria so they can bomb Iran Typical mentally challenged Pro Palestinian mentality

What? You mean we don't take our orders from those evil Zionistas? The hell you say!
 
Bibi thinks Assad should go? Who would replace him then? Bibi doesn't give a Crap about what he does to his own people nor should he.

" Israel would love to see Iran nuked blown sky high" is very different from a Pro Palestinian Psycho stating that if we attack Syria it's under " orders" from Israel so they can initiate a War with Iran. You don't see the difference? Birds of a feather flock together. All Pro Palestinians march to the same beat. :cuckoo:

Mideast Dispatch Archive: Peres tells Arab media “Assad must go,” and Netanyahu again hints at it too
S
So what? That has nothing to do with the claim that the US will " take its orders" from Israel to bomb Syria so they can bomb Iran Typical mentally challenged Pro Palestinian mentality

Israel doesn't have to order America to do what's best for Israel. America already knows what Israel prefers. They want Assad to go. They have already attacked Syria themselves.
Do you hear Israel pleading for America to not intervene in Syria ?
 
The Illuminatti drew up three world wars, as proscribed by the writings of a Confederate Civil War general in the late 1800's. The first two were to be carried out by Germany and they would set up the Illuminatti state in Israel, then the third would be carried out by that new power on the planet against (get this) IRAN.

Look like we are right on schedule.

naaaa It's all a bluff. We're going to lob a few cruise missiles at Assad and everyone will go home....

They will use the Libya doctrine. The end results in Libya is chaos with an Islamist run government, however, the strategy in Libya was brilliant. Our government desired regime change and the end of Gaddiff's reign. I personally thought and still believe Gaddiff was the best of many evils. He ended their WND program, stabilized the country, fought Islamic terrorism and was not a threat to any other country. Now they are a hotbed for Islamist, who knows what weapons they are developing, they are antiWestern and antiAmerican and a threat to the world now.

But I digress. Grounding Gaddiff's airforce took away Gaddiff's only advantage that would have won him the civil war, hitting strategic targets put serious dents in the Gaddiff regime and last conducting secret special force raids helped the rebels secure airs. Then without the ground invasion we never occupied the country and never had to commit to nation building. It was a brilliant strategy. You have to recognize that even if you are like me and think the intervention was a mistake and still believe Gaddiff was the best of many evils.

Take out AASSSad air capabilities (which would be very easy), conduct secret special force attacks and take out Syria's military infrastructure, would allow the rebels to take the country within a few months much like in Libya.

Is an Al Qaeda run Islamist Sharia pushing government better for the world than AASSSad? Absolutely NOT! AASSSad is the better of the two evils and that is who should be supported!
 
S
So what? That has nothing to do with the claim that the US will " take its orders" from Israel to bomb Syria so they can bomb Iran Typical mentally challenged Pro Palestinian mentality

Israel doesn't have to order America to do what's best for Israel. America already knows what Israel prefers. They want Assad to go. They have already attacked Syria themselves.
Do you hear Israel pleading for America to not intervene in Syria ?

Nice try but stop deflecting. Israel has never " attacked" Syria without provocation. Instead of getting Israel into the mix why don't you condemn Assad for what he is doing? Why should Israel plead for America not to intervene in Syria ? If Israel were attacked by Egypt and Jordan would Syria " intervene" and encourage them to follow " International Law" lol and stop? :lol: They would jump right in !



Iranian Official: Israel to Be ?First Victim? of U.S. Attack on Syria | Washington Free Beacon




Iranian Official: Israel to Be ‘First Victim’ of U.S. Attack on Syria

Claims U.S. does not have ability to strike Assad











A Syrian army soldier walks on a street in the Jobar neighborhood of Damascus, Syria / AP
A Syrian army soldier walks on a street in the Jobar neighborhood of Damascus, Syria / AP



BY: Adam Kredo
August 27, 2013 1:35 pm

A senior Iranian lawmaker said Israel would be the first casualty of any U.S.-led strike on Syria, according to regional media reports.

Hossein Sheikholeslam, the director general of the Iranian parliament’s International Affairs bureau, claimed the United States would not dare attack Syria but said that if it does, “the Zionist regime will be the first victim.”

“No military attack will be waged against Syria,” Sheikholeslam was quoted as saying on Monday by Iran’s state run Fars News Agency.

“Yet, if such an incident takes place, which is impossible, the Zionist regime will be the first victim of a military attack on Syria,” Sheikholeslam said in an apparent response to the Obama administration’s increasingly stern rhetoric against Syria.

Iran has been one of embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s chief allies. It has sent Hezbollah reinforcements to battle rebel forces and acted as Assad’s chief defender in the Middle East.

As the Obama administration hints that it is gearing up to intervene in Syria following the reported use of chemical weapons, Iranian officials have similarly ramped up their rhetoric.

Sheikholeslam said Assad would immediately respond to a U.S. attack by going after the Jewish state with the full force of his military.


Seriously, this is more proof that " International Law" never existed. However, the initial claim was that the U.S. is under " Zionist" control ( Nothing to do with Assad killing his own people by gassing them) and using this deflection to bomb Iran. Source, please. There is none because you are a liar. However, we all know that's what Pro Palestinians do :cuckoo:
 
Hossein Sheikholeslam, the director general of the Iranian parliament’s International Affairs bureau, claimed the United States would not dare attack Syria but said that if it does, “the Zionist regime will be the first victim.”

“No military attack will be waged against Syria,” Sheikholeslam was quoted as saying on Monday by Iran’s state run Fars News Agency.

“Yet, if such an incident takes place, which is impossible, the Zionist regime will be the first victim of a military attack on Syria,” Sheikholeslam said in an apparent response to the Obama administration’s increasingly stern rhetoric against Syria. :cuckoo:

Yep, :cuckoo:

Those are the same minds that say Israel attacks its own embassies in order to blame Iran.

And they want to go nuclear.

Using Iranian logic, this means they wish to blow themselves up.
 
Syria and Iran warn that Israel will be DELIBERATELY target if the US intervenes in Syria. Where is the UN when these threats ( they are promises) are made? If that happens will they be labeled the " Agressors?" Of course not. Will other Countries that have made " peace" with Israel become agressive and interfere? What would the UN say about that IF it did happen? The answer is NOTHING!

For those who wonder why Israel does not hold the UN in high regard, the above are just some of the reasons. The real reasons start with May 14, 1948.
 

Forum List

Back
Top