Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can post pics of dead children all you want, Sky. Don't forget the ones starving to death in India and Uganda.
The shock value does nothing except make most folks sad and disgusted with this world we live in. And I still stick with my opinion that we need to butt out.
No.
I missed nothing.
Children are dead... I don't miss that.
No.
I missed nothing.
Children are dead... I don't miss that.
I was retorting to a claim that the US is already allied with the rebels and aiding them, and that the rebels we are helping is Al Qaeda, which is false.The State dept. released a memo of the position the US is taking on supporting the rebels but there are several factions and the State dept is trying to find the non- Al Qaeda rebels.
Don't forget the ones starving to death in India and Uganda.
This statement is totally irrelevant in application to the situation is Syria.
Don't forget the ones starving to death in India and Uganda.
This statement is totally irrelevant in application to the situation is Syria.
How?
No.
I missed nothing.
Children are dead... I don't miss that.
I was retorting to a claim that the US is already allied with the rebels and aiding them, and that the rebels we are helping is Al Qaeda, which is false.The State dept. released a memo of the position the US is taking on supporting the rebels but there are several factions and the State dept is trying to find the non- Al Qaeda rebels.
blah blah blah
too little too late
it is happening ....
go cry somewhere else.
So you want WWIII that could potentially get rid of all life on planet earth?This is what I have been waiting for with this situation. NATO, not just a few members should get involved in this situation.
"Barack Obama is unlikely to have much trouble mustering a Nato coalition of the willing if Washington opts for military intervention in Syria in response to the alleged chemical weapons atrocities by the Assad regime...
Turkey, which accounts for Nato's second largest army after the US, and which is on the frontline with Syria, bearing the brunt of the massive refugee crisis, is already a key conduit for arms supplies to, and a safe haven for, the sundry groups of fighters at war with Damascus.
It has been the loudest critic of the Assad regime, clamouring for the west to do more. In any international coalition Turkey would be likely to play a key role with a potential impact on the country's own ethnic balance, especially the relations between the Sunni Muslim majority and the sizeable Alevi minority concentrated in the south near the Syrian border.
Britain and France, the EU's only military powers with the capacity and will to project military muscle abroad, look certain to line up with the US."
Nato members could act against Syria without UN mandate | World news | The Guardian
So you want WWIII that could potentially get rid of all life on planet earth?This is what I have been waiting for with this situation. NATO, not just a few members should get involved in this situation.
"Barack Obama is unlikely to have much trouble mustering a Nato coalition of the willing if Washington opts for military intervention in Syria in response to the alleged chemical weapons atrocities by the Assad regime...
Turkey, which accounts for Nato's second largest army after the US, and which is on the frontline with Syria, bearing the brunt of the massive refugee crisis, is already a key conduit for arms supplies to, and a safe haven for, the sundry groups of fighters at war with Damascus.
It has been the loudest critic of the Assad regime, clamouring for the west to do more. In any international coalition Turkey would be likely to play a key role with a potential impact on the country's own ethnic balance, especially the relations between the Sunni Muslim majority and the sizeable Alevi minority concentrated in the south near the Syrian border.
Britain and France, the EU's only military powers with the capacity and will to project military muscle abroad, look certain to line up with the US."
Nato members could act against Syria without UN mandate | World news | The Guardian
The Russian's have already said they will not allow Syria to fall under the control of NATO.
Can anyone make a more irresponsible statement?
This statement is totally irrelevant in application to the situation is Syria.
How?
How is it? You introduce issues which simply do not speak to the situation in Syria. For example, a basis for intervening in Syria... "might be violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which outlaws the use in war of poison gas." How does that square with your hypothesis?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/w...yria-chemical-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Royal Navy vessels are being readied to take part in a possible series of cruise missile strikes, alongside the United States, as military commanders finalise a list of potential targets.
Government sources said talks between the Prime Minister and international leaders, including Barack Obama, would continue, but that any military action that was agreed could begin within the next week.
25 Aug 2013
Navy ready to launch first strike on Syria - Telegraph
This statement is totally irrelevant in application to the situation is Syria.
How?
How is it? You introduce issues which simply do not speak to the situation in Syria. For example, a basis for intervening in Syria... "might be violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which outlaws the use in war of poison gas." How does that square with your hypothesis?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/w...yria-chemical-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Did you (or did you not) say this?The irresponsibility is all yours, you do not speak to the article or my position, but speak from emotion without a fact based rebuttal or argument....![]()
So yes, I am speaking to your position.This is what I have been waiting for with this situation. NATO, not just a few members should get involved in this situation.
That's the Chinese position.Russia and China Prepare for Global War
On December 7, 2011, the EU Times headlined “China Joins Russia, Orders Military to Prepare for World War III.
A Beijing Ministry of Defense bulletin said then President Hu “agreed in principle” that deterring US-led Western aggression’s only possible by “direct and immediate military action” or threat thereof.
He ordered his naval forces to “prepare for war.” BBC reported the same story. He wants stepped up preparation and readiness.
And just what event might start this WWIII?Russian General Nikolai Makarov said:
“I do not rule out local and regional armed conflicts developing into a large-scale war, including using nuclear weapons.”
Furthermore, Russia has two warships parked in Syrian ports and have been conducting large scale military manuevers in preparation for war.Beijing’s bulletin discussed a US-planned “ultimate (Middle East) solution.” It’s readied in case of regional nuclear war. It said Washington will attack Syria and Iran with lethal biological weapons. They’re “intended to kill tens of millions of innocent civilians.”