robotics : dreaming away on the job?

This is the next stage in robotics.

This device is called a memristor.


Here are its characteristics:
1723526118789.png


The Chinese just came up with an optical one of these. It consumes virtually zero power.

What this is, is a resistor with a non volatile memory. In other words, an artificial synapse.


Here's what a neural network made of memristors looks like:

1723526560207.png


But here's the really interesting part:

Memristors can be made from proteins.


Variations of ferritin seem to work exceedingly well

This discovery has led to an explosion of research in neuroscience, to understand how long term memory is retained at the synaptic level.

A synapse turns out to be very complicated. Little bits of RNA travel from the cell body to the synapse via microtubules, where they make proteins. These proteins insert themselves into the cell membrane on either side of the synapse,then travel into the middle of the synapse in an activity dependent manner. There, they bind with receptors to regulate the strength and effectiveness of synaptic transmission.

The difference between natural and artificial memristors, is that the natural ones are stochastic (probabilistic). What is euphemistically called the "opening and closing of ion channels" depends on the instantaneous configuration of a polymer (it usually has four or six subunits). This is where asynchronous timing is introduced and propagated. An ion can sit "near" a channel for a long time before it's admitted through. This is one reason why the field strength across a nerve membrane is so powerful, it can reach millions of volts per meter, enough to cause a complete dielectric breakdown in the membrane.

Asynchronous timing is very hard to achieve without biomolecules. Fifty years ago the answer was a super-fast clock. Today, it's a quantum process. Tomorrow it will be mixing biomolecules with the regular lattice you see in the above pic. Picosecond timing is not required, all that's needed is for the synapses to update at slightly different times . In computer models this means using the Monte Carlo method, which is time consuming and computationally expensive. But memristors made of biomolecules can do it in real time, just like the human brain.
 
Again: neural networks are not digital.
They are deterministic.
Otay... If you say so... :p

A neural network can do it too.
Do what exactly? If the neural network can be simulated by computer then by definition its behavior can be described algorithmically, as a Turning machine.
AI has already solved problems that vexxed mathematicians for centuries.
AI (as defined today, as opposed to say the 60s and 70s) is good at analysis of large data, image recognition and the like. But that's not really intelligence, certainly not as we see it in humans. Mathematicians do not achieve their advances algorithmically. This point is crystalized in the Gödel theorems. He was able to show that there are true statements (in some domain, some language) that cannot be proven true using just the axioms of that domain - yet they are true, he (his mind) was able to discern that, true statements but unprovable, unprovable means there's no algorithm for determining the truth.

Take a look at the famous Halting Problem for a similar thing.
You are ignorant.

I told you already, it's STOCHASTIC optimization.
What is?
By definition, that is the exact opposite of deterministic.
You seem to be conflating determinism and predictability.
I just spent half a thread showing you why asynchronicity is important. Maybe you should read it.
I'm a software engineer, former electronics engineer and programming language designer, why is "asynchronicity" relevant to the question of consciousness?
 
Last edited:
and predicting the future is only possible for futurists (Iron Man) and the Kwizat Hiderrach (Dune), and even then : very often inaccurate and next to impossible.
There's an interesting article out there somewhere about who was the best at predicting the future between Isaac Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke, I can't recall who they said was best though.
 

Forum List

Back
Top