Systemic Racism Question

[Laslow]

It seems pretty obvious that systemic racism is just a made up term to promote Marxism. To dem politicians, people who can support themselves are white or Asian, and they have an unfair advantage because they are not on welfare or in single parent homes. Therefore society must be torn down so the government forces equal outcomes, fairness. With the recent SC Rulings, the dems are howling that society isn't fair enough for people to be legally treated the same. It is much like the idiots on the view telling senator Scott that minorities can't succeed because life is unfair. It seems white democrats and their allies have their boots firmly on the necks of minorities by telling them they can't be successful because of how they look. The only answer dems give is that society isn't ready yet, it isn't fair. That simply means that there isn't government forced outcomes. To the dems, in today's age, do you really think that someone who is good at a job and shows up to work everyday will be exclude because of how they look?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

If you want to see actual systemic racism, look no further than affirmative action.

When institutions/businesses can hire, fire, promote & elevate simply on the basis of race, you are seeing real life racism in the system.

The Dems that claim otherwise are just showing their own proclivities for the soft racism of low expectations

 

[elektra]

Now that they have no examples (except a rare case here or there) of Racism, the Marxist Democrats have bastardized language and made up new terms so that they can fight against racism even though there is none.

The Noam Chomsky School of Linguistic Political Somersaults

Language is destroyed, it began with political correctness. The Democrats use language to hold power.

Systemic Racism, is a brilliant, tyrannical tool of the Marxist Democrats.

 

[Woodznutz]

Blacks particularly are in the economic stage of gratifying themselves by 'conspicuous consumption' of the goods and services denied to them in the past. When this is satisfied, they will build wealth through savings and investment. They just need time to catch up. It's all good.

 

[elektra]

Blacks particularly are in the economic stage of gratifying themselves by 'conspicuous consumption' of the goods and services denied to them in the past. When this is satisfied, they will build wealth through savings and investment. They just need time to catch up. It's all good.

as if that is memory, a want, carried in our genetics

blacks have all the goods and services they have desired this century, for most the last century as well, at least as much as anyone else

 

[Lesh]

It seems pretty obvious that systemic racism is just a made up term to promote Marxism. To dem politicians, people who can support themselves are white or Asian, and they have an unfair advantage because they are not on welfare or in single parent homes. Therefore society must be torn down so the government forces equal outcomes, fairness. With the recent SC Rulings, the dems are howling that society isn't fair enough for people to be legally treated the same. It is much like the idiots on the view telling senator Scott that minorities can't succeed because life is unfair. It seems white democrats and their allies have their boots firmly on the necks of minorities by telling them they can't be successful because of how they look. The only answer dems give is that society isn't ready yet, it isn't fair. That simply means that there isn't government forced outcomes. To the dems, in today's age, do you really think that someone who is good at a job and shows up to work everyday will be exclude because of how they look?

I take it you’re white. Hardly an expert on the subject.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The goal is Marxism and the obstacle is American culture. Anything that can be construed to demonize American culture abets Marxism. Equating anything about American culture with white supremacy is a great opportunity for marxists.

 

[Lesh]

Marxists your ass

 

[konradv]

It seems pretty obvious that systemic racism is just a made up term to promote Marxism. To dem politicians, people who can support themselves are white or Asian, and they have an unfair advantage because they are not on welfare or in single parent homes. Therefore society must be torn down so the government forces equal outcomes, fairness. With the recent SC Rulings, the dems are howling that society isn't fair enough for people to be legally treated the same. It is much like the idiots on the view telling senator Scott that minorities can't succeed because life is unfair. It seems white democrats and their allies have their boots firmly on the necks of minorities by telling them they can't be successful because of how they look. The only answer dems give is that society isn't ready yet, it isn't fair. That simply means that there isn't government forced outcomes. To the dems, in today's age, do you really think that someone who is good at a job and shows up to work everyday will be exclude because of how they look?

You don’t start a legitimate question with a statement that presumes the answer you want. If you’re asking an honest question, anyway.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

It seems pretty obvious that systemic racism is just a made up term to promote Marxism. To dem politicians, people who can support themselves are white or Asian, and they have an unfair advantage because they are not on welfare or in single parent homes. Therefore society must be torn down so the government forces equal outcomes, fairness. With the recent SC Rulings, the dems are howling that society isn't fair enough for people to be legally treated the same. It is much like the idiots on the view telling senator Scott that minorities can't succeed because life is unfair. It seems white democrats and their allies have their boots firmly on the necks of minorities by telling them they can't be successful because of how they look. The only answer dems give is that society isn't ready yet, it isn't fair. That simply means that there isn't government forced outcomes. To the dems, in today's age, do you really think that someone who is good at a job and shows up to work everyday will be exclude because of how they look?

The whole thing is a design to get people distracted from the bad economy. The great majority of Black people despise Black Lives Matter. BLM is a bunch of thieves, and they claim that systemic racism exists when it doesn’t. There’s so much love and unity among Americans, and we stand up every day to the far left extremists and their neocon allies.

 

[Laslow]

You don’t start a legitimate question with a statement that presumes the answer you want. If you’re asking an honest question, anyway.

At what point do you think being equal under the law is good enough?

 

[Laslow]

I take it you’re white. Hardly an expert on the subject.

Great, why don't you tell us when being equal under the law is good enough. I'm betting your answer will be when the government forces equal outcomes and not a moment sooner. If I am wrong, please enlighten me.

 

[konradv]

At what point do you think being equal under the law is good enough?

At what point do you think that’s a question that makes sense?

 

[Laslow]

At what point do you think that’s a question that makes sense?

You and the ladies on the view don't think it is good enough, so at what point would you say being equal is good enough?

 

[konradv]

You and the ladies on the view don't think it is good enough, so at what point would you say being equal is good enough?

That’s still not a question.

 

[scruffy]

That’s still not a question.

lol - look at the lefties run

lmao

Can't even answer a simple question.

 

[konradv]

lol - look at the lefties run

lmao

Can't even answer a simple question.

Show me a question.

 

[scruffy]

Show me a question.

ah ha ha ha lmao@u

 

[konradv]

ah ha ha ha lmao@u

Is that English? If not, what language do I put in the translate app?

 

[Laslow]

That’s still not a question.

How about this? Are there any benchmarks we can hit where a democrat would say there is no need for favoritism based on appearance? There has to be something other than cradle to grave government intervention that would be acceptable. It can't just be give everyone everything, they work if they want to, and magic rich people pay for those who don't want to do anything.