Talent on loan from god!

[HUGGY]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPTdSYTLA10]YouTube - Elton John - Burn Down The Mission - 1970[/ame]

I've had it with you ignorant christian fascist fucks. Its war bitches.

 

[edthecynic]

RUSH: The real unemployment rate is not 9.4%. If laid-off workers who have given up looking for new jobs or have settled for part-time work are included in the unemployment rate -- this is what's called U6 -- the total unemployment rate nationwide is 16.3%. If you add the people still looking for work and those who have given up, it's 16.3% unemployed. State-Run Media is trying to make this out to be some big successful day today.

Well, let's compare how GOP Hate-Run Media "reports" the same data.

GOP Hate-Run Media uses only Bush's U3 numbers and not even the U3 numbers passed to him by Clinton and the U3 numbers he passes to Obama but Bush"s best U3 numbers. Furthermore GOP Hate-Run Media claims the Bush Recession of March 2001 was inherited by Bush from Clinton and as you know GOP Hate-Run Media denies Obama inherited a recession.

Clinton inherited a 7.49% U3 unemployment from Bush I and passed a 3.97% U3 and a 7.0% U6 unemployment plus a surplus to Bush II. Bush II in turn passed a 7.2% U3 unemployment to Obama. If you remember GOP Hate-Run Media never used U6 numbers for Bush, but Bush passed a 13.5% U6 unemployment to Obama.

Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page
August 7, 2009
Story #5: NYT to Claim Unemployment Problem "Decade Old"

RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, I have been advised that the New York Times planning heavy coverage for this weekend on the following story. It's being written by Floyd Norris. "In Last Decade, a Lack of Job Growth..." This the just amazing in its malpractice and irresponsibility. Listen to this now. "For the first time since the Depression, the American economy has added virtually no jobs in the private sector over a 10-year period. The total number of jobs has grown a bit, but that is only because of government hiring. The accompanying charts," which I don't have here; I just have the advanced text "show the job performance from July 1999, when the economy was booming and companies were complaining about how hard it was to find workers, through July of this year, when the economy was mired in the deepest and longest recession since World War II."

So from 1999 to now, we have produced no new jobs. We've been in a decade-long jobs recession. The Bush administration never happened! They're willing -- at their near bankrupt newsroom, at the New York Times -- they are willing to put out drivel like this in order to prop up this catastrophe of a president. You remember it was just two years ago we were at record employment at 4.7%, after coming out of a mild recession that Clinton left us with and then 9/11. We had a growing population. We had a booming economy that they tried to make everybody think was rotten, especially in the second Bush term.


Story #6: AP Admits Unemployment Rate Didn't Really Dip

RUSH: I must mention this. I finally read the full Associated Press story on the new unemployment numbers, and even the AP admits that unemployment didn't really dip. "Employers sharply scale back layoffs in July. The unemployment rate dips for the first time in 15 months, sending a strong signal, the worst recession..."

Then you go to the end of the article, buried at the bottom: "The dip in the unemployment rate was the first since April 2008. One of the reasons the rate declined, though, was that hundreds of thousands of people left the labor force. The labor force includes only those who are either employed or are looking for work." So even AP admits unemployment didn't really dip. We just had a hell of a lot of people give up looking, and they're not counted as members of the labor force. That's what we now know in the BLS figures they put out, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The U6, unemployment 6... Like 9.4% is U3 and that's people who are employed, looking for work, not employed, on unemployment benefits. U6 is everybody that's looking for work, on unemployment compensation and those who are no longer looking, they've given up, and that rate is 16%. Not 9.4. It is 16, maybe 16.9, but it's 16 something. And even AP admits unemployment didn't really dip. It just went off the charts, just went off the unemployment rolls. Well, we have been rescued. See, AP knows people aren't going to read the bottom of the story. We've been rescued from this catastrophe. The president said so today.

MinnPost - U6: The unemployment rate and the misery index - Political Economy by Steve Perry

U6 is defined as "total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of all civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers."
You can think of this more expansive measure as a sort of employment misery index. And in December 2008, when the official unemployment rate rose to 7.2 percent, U6 reached 13.5 percent.

The United States Unemployment Rate By Year

Bush, G.H.W.
1992
7.49

Clinton
1993
6.91


1994
6.10


1995
5.59


1996
5.41


1997
4.94


1998
4.50


1999
4.22


2000
3.97

And I did answer * * * *

^ Another EdTheLyingMassiveMoron outright, bald-faced, unintelligent, glaringly-obvious and utterly unpersausive lie.

Here, I'm making it easy for you. The post you falsely claim I said LimpBoy lied about the current U6 numbers is re-posted above with my words in red. All you have to do is highlight where I said Your MessiahRushie lied about the current U6 numbers.

No no. I'll make it easy for you. Prove that Rush lied about the U6 figures he cited. Unless those U6 figures are false (and they are not false) then even a lyingmassivemoron like you ought to be able to admit that they are not lies.

THEN, go dig up and present anything said by Rush -- about the Obama Adminsitration employement claims -- that IS a lie since his quotation of the recent U6 figures are NOT lies.

You will NOT be able to do so. You ARE unable to present an honest post. You ARE unable to post almost anything without resort to your worn-out efforts to use your meaningless ad hominems about those who disagree with you in political philosophy.

Why should I have to prove LimpBoy lied about Obama's U6 numbers when I never said he lied about that. That was a lie you made up so you prove I said it. I said he lied about Bush's U3 numbers being a record and I already proved that with links.

What I said was your MessiahRushie DISHONESTLY compared Obama's U6 numbers to Bush's best U3 numbers which is again undeniable and already proved with links. I also said LimpBoy never used Bush's U6 numbers and even in that rant about U6 numbers he hypocritically used only Bush's best U3 number even though the essence of his rant was U6 numbers are more accurate than U3 numbers.

Admit it, in order to call me a liar you had to make up your own lie and attribute it to me.

Nope. Here, http://www.usmessageboard.com/1405149-post166.html , you responded to Ozzie’s post, http://www.usmessageboard.com/1405020-post164.html . What YOU did was compare what RUSH had said (which is still true) that the Obama Administration numbers are reporting U3 not U6 figures WITH “how GOP Hate-Run Media ‘reports’ the same data.”

So, you might as well STOP lying, EdTheLyingMassiveMoron.

Your words defeat you because the words of a MASSIVE LIAR such as you WILL come back to haunt you.

And I'm more than happy to have helped to continue to expose your deliberate and endless dishonesty.

First of all, your first link is the same post I re-posted with my words in red asking you to show where I said LimpBoy LIED about the currenr Obama U6 numbers as you falsely claimed. You couldn't because I didn't.

NOW you backtrack and claim I lied because I said COMPARE how GOP Hate-Run media uses U6 and U3 numbers. So tell me what exactly in my comparison was a "lie."

I said LimpBoy dishonestly and hypocritically used Bush's U3 numbers and not Bush's U6 numbers after saying how much more accurate U6 numbers are when he compared Obama's U6 numbers to Bush's Best U3 number, and not even the HIGHER U3 number Bush left Obama with. That's exactly what your MessiahRushie DID so how is that a lie???

Bush's U6 number for Dec 2008 was 13.5%, show me where GOP Hate-Run media used that number!!! The links are there to prove that number and the fact IS that LimpBoy never used it anywhere in his rants that day. Ozzie's post and the two "quick hits" I posted were all from the same day. Saying LimpBoy was dishonest in not using Bush's U6 numbers is not the same as saying he's a liar. And it WAS dishonest to compare U6 numbers to U3 numbers.

Now LimpBoy DID lie about bush's U3 numbers being a "record." Do you deny that 4.7% is NOT a "record?"
Clinton had a 3.9% U3 for a number of months and even a 3.8% U3 for 1 month and a 3.97% U3 average for the year 2000 so how exactly can LimpBoy be telling the truth when he said Bush's 4.7% U3 was a "record." A record for a Bush president perhaps, but not a record in any other sense!!!

You have been programmed to call my honest comparisons a lie because otherwise you would have to admit your MessiahRushie is dishonest and a hypocrite.

 

[elvis]

YouTube - Elton John - Burn Down The Mission - 1970

I've had it with you ignorant christian fascist fucks. Its war bitches.

Well, it's a good song, anyway.

 

[ozzmdj]

Chuck Norris Does the Job the State-Controlled Media Used to Do


BEGIN TRANSCRIPT


RUSH: Now, here is Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris. Now, no offense. I've met Chuck Norris and I like Chuck Norris and Chuck Norris is a good guy. He's a little wrong on McCain, but that's in the past. I met Chuck Norris once and I had a great conversation. Chuck Norris, of all people, has a column at Conservative News, Issues, Political Cartoons, Blogs, Talk Radio, Commentary from Townhall Conservatives entitled, Dirty Secret Number One on Obamacare. Chuck Norris has done something that nobody at NBC has done. Chuck Norris has done something that nobody at ABC has done. Chuck Norris has done something that nobody at CBS has done. Chuck Norris has done something that nobody at MSNBC has done. Chuck Norris has done something that nobody at CNN has done. He read the bill, and he found something in it on page 838 in Sections 440 and 1904.

"Dirty secret No. 1 in Obamacare is about the government coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care development. It's outlined in passages like Section 440 and Section 1904 of the House bill (page 838) under the heading: 'Home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children,' which would provide (via grants to states) for home visitation programs to educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills. ... The bill says that the government agents, the 'well-trained and competent staff,' will 'provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive language, social, emotional and motor domains ... modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices, skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.'" All that is in quotes from the bill.

So Chuck Norris (laughing), who found something no other journalist has found says, "Are you kidding me?! And with whose parental principles and values? Their own? Certain experts? Who? From what field and theory of childhood development? As if there are one-size-fits-all parenting techniques? Do we really believe they will contextualize and personalize every form of parenting...?" Chuck, this isn't the question. Chuck's making a mistake. He's accepting the premise and then saying that people coming into the home are not going to be qualified. What the hell business is it of anybody in the government to come into your home and tell you whether you're raising your kid right or not, or to test to see if you're raising your kid right or not? I know. I know you're saying, "Rush, that can't be in the bill. It just can't be there! Rush, it just can't be there."

This is who statists, authoritarians are -- and any of you fathers out there who have ever had the dreaded knock from Social Services on your front door because you were thought to be a predator just because you're a man and you got your kids taken away from you, it's not that hard to believe that this kind of thing would happen. But the idea that they'd want to do this? Look, the whole point of state-run health care, as I've been trying to point out, is not health care. It is the regulation and control of every aspect of life. You can't understand, people can't relate to Americans, fellow Americans wanting, to do this to other Americans, and that's simply because you don't understand liberals and you don't understand authoritarians, and you don't understand the history of the world.

The history of the world is tyranny. The history of the world is dictatorship. The history of the world is starvation and famine and poverty. The history of the world is totalitarianism, dungeons, torture. That's the history of the world. That's what makes America so unique. That's what American exceptionalism is all about. We weren't and never have been that. This is the one place in all of humanity which has never, ever had to emerge from something like that. We started differently. And these people showing up at town hall meetings know full well what's at stake here. It's their liberty and freedom. So here Chuck Norris has read the bill.


END TRANSCRIPT

 

[edthecynic]

Chuck Norris Does the Job the State-Controlled Media Used to Do


BEGIN TRANSCRIPT


RUSH:

"Dirty secret No. 1 in Obamacare is about the government coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care development. It's outlined in passages like Section 440 and Section 1904 of the House bill (page 838) under the heading: 'Home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children,' which would provide (via grants to states) for home visitation programs to educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills. ... The bill says that the government agents, the 'well-trained and competent staff,' will 'provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive language, social, emotional and motor domains ... modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices, skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.'" All that is in quotes from the bill.

One thing I have pointed out in the past is LimpBoy gets bored lying to such GULLIBLE fools as the CON$ in his audience, so he likes to give you proof he's lying within his lie.

In this case he is literally telling you that the crap about "GOVERNMENT AGENTS" is NOT in the bill because it is not in quotes. But, of course, he knows there is no CON$ervative on the face of the Earth observant enough to catch that embellishment even after his heads-up!

Now the Ditto-Nazis will chime in with their RATIONALIZATIONS of how that embellishment is not an embellishment.

Now to the observant Cynic, if the bill is as bad as the America hating practitioners of the hate religion of CON$ervatism say it is, why do they have to lie and embellish the bill in the first place?????????

 

[NYcarbineer]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

 

[Liability]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

Do you understand that rich people actually buy more stuff (it is a highly technical concept for idiots like you -- but to boil it down, it turns out that the rich have more money and thus are able to buy more, lots more) and the the rich help make the rich rich.

If Rich Richman makes a product that has a very high demand, he is probably employing lots of people (even the non-rich) and thus contributing to the improvement of their lot in life. He is also likely to be selling to the non-rich who are under no obligation to buy his product, but who often do for reasons that elude you. He is also probably selling to the rich (since selling stuff is very egalitarian) who are also under no obligation to buy his stuff.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

Do you understand that rich people actually buy more stuff (it is a highly technical concept for idiots like you -- but to boil it down, it turns out that the rich have more money and thus are able to buy more, lots more) and the the rich help make the rich rich.

If Rich Richman makes a product that has a very high demand, he is probably employing lots of people (even the non-rich) and thus contributing to the improvement of their lot in life. He is also likely to be selling to the non-rich who are under no obligation to buy his product, but who often do for reasons that elude you. He is also probably selling to the rich (since selling stuff is very egalitarian) who are also under no obligation to buy his stuff.

I wasn't commenting on the obvious fact that the rich have money, so you need not have a Eureka! moment proclaiming that.

Where did their money come from? Who had their money before they got it? Where does Rush's money come from for example?

Figure that out and you might be able to figure out why the rich aren't quite as rich as they were.

 

[Liability]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

Do you understand that rich people actually buy more stuff (it is a highly technical concept for idiots like you -- but to boil it down, it turns out that the rich have more money and thus are able to buy more, lots more) and the the rich help make the rich rich.

If Rich Richman makes a product that has a very high demand, he is probably employing lots of people (even the non-rich) and thus contributing to the improvement of their lot in life. He is also likely to be selling to the non-rich who are under no obligation to buy his product, but who often do for reasons that elude you. He is also probably selling to the rich (since selling stuff is very egalitarian) who are also under no obligation to buy his stuff.

I wasn't commenting on the obvious fact that the rich have money, so you need not have a Eureka! moment proclaiming that.

Where did their money come from? Who had their money before they got it? Where does Rush's money come from for example?

Figure that out and you might be able to figure out why the rich aren't quite as rich as they were.

Where did the money which presently belongs to the "rich" come from?

Is that ACTUALLY the "question" you wish to be known as having asked?



You're a brain surgeon.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you understand that rich people actually buy more stuff (it is a highly technical concept for idiots like you -- but to boil it down, it turns out that the rich have more money and thus are able to buy more, lots more) and the the rich help make the rich rich.

If Rich Richman makes a product that has a very high demand, he is probably employing lots of people (even the non-rich) and thus contributing to the improvement of their lot in life. He is also likely to be selling to the non-rich who are under no obligation to buy his product, but who often do for reasons that elude you. He is also probably selling to the rich (since selling stuff is very egalitarian) who are also under no obligation to buy his stuff.

I wasn't commenting on the obvious fact that the rich have money, so you need not have a Eureka! moment proclaiming that.

Where did their money come from? Who had their money before they got it? Where does Rush's money come from for example?

Figure that out and you might be able to figure out why the rich aren't quite as rich as they were.

Where did the money which presently belongs to the "rich" come from?

Is that ACTUALLY the "question" you wish to be known as having asked?



You're a brain surgeon.

Is that a question you want to known as not being able to answer?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Limbaugh makes most of his money off the crap products hawkers that advertise around talk radio.

See how easy that was to answer?

 

[Liability]

Limbaugh makes most of his money off the crap products hawkers that advertise around talk radio.

See how easy that was to answer?

Holy cow. You're like all brilliant and stuff. Imagine the import of that valuable lesson!

Radio personalities get paid by their stations/networks/syndicators who in turn get their money from the companies who buy ad space on the radio shows hosted by the radio personalities.

Wow.

How insightful!

Nobody would EVER have know that without your assistance.

Except -- well -- pretty much everyone.

 

[DiveCon]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

uh, the not rich dont have the money to spend as the rich do, so logic says they get more from other RICH people

 

[HUGGY]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

uh, the not rich dont have the money to spend as the rich do, so logic says they get more from other RICH people

 

[DiveCon]

Does Rush understand that the rich make their money off the not-rich?

uh, the not rich dont have the money to spend as the rich do, so logic says they get more from other RICH people

yeah, you are nutz

 

[ozzmdj]

Did Democrats Plant Swastikas?

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT


RUSH: I told you this was going to happen, and it has happened. We can prove that it's happened once, and I think we're going to be able to prove it happened a second time. I predicted it halfway yesterday. Right before Obama's... We now know, by the way, the whole thing yesterday was a stacked deck. That thing in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, was totally phony. The little girl that asked a question is a daughter of a huge Obama supporter. ... So yesterday it was right back about one o'clock, 1:15 Eastern Time when Obama started that dog-and-pony show that was the most pathetic thing. Yesterday that town hall illustrated his lack of experience and lack of competence in what he was trying to do.

I said, "Folks, don't be surprised if during the course of this town hall meeting there is a disturbance and some people show up in Klan outfits or carrying swastika signs, and if it happens it will be union supporters. It will be ACORN people. It will be political plants." Let us never forget: Nancy Pelosi started this whole swastika business. All I did was respond in kind with an accurate and researched comparison between the National Socialism in Germany and the attempt to socialize health care in this country with some of the other Obama programs tossed in as well. Pelosi started all of this. Dick Durbin started all of this. He called our interrogators at Club Gitmo Nazis, Nazi-like.

Democrats have been tarring and feathering conservatives (or trying to) for my whole career with this. I fired back in kind, and so I get up last night or this morning and I'm diligently doing show prep. As I always do, I go to Drudge page and say, "Whoa! Congressman David Scott's sign outside the office has a swastika painted on it. Ha-ha-ha. How convenient! How absolutely convenient." I don't know in this case, but we do know that a swastika sign at a Dingell town hall was made and paraded around by a Dingell supporter. It has been proven. It has been established. I'll get to that in just a second. Here's David Scott. Let's go to CNN Headline News. See, this is why you people in the State-Run Media are in big trouble. You're trying to make this whole health care debate something about me. I didn't start anything!

As usual, I'm defending America. I'm defending myself. I'm defending the honor of the people who make this country work. You people are out calling us Nazis, saying we're running around with swastikas, when we are threatened with the loss of our freedom. So we're showing up to people who work for us, and we're demanding answers, and they don't have the answers, and they tell us when we read the bill that that's not what's in the bill. Well, we've read it and they haven't. There ought to be anger about this, there ought to be outrage, and there is. So we get tarred and feathered as Nazis 'cause we just don't bend over, grab the ankles, and let you guys ram whatever down our throats that you want. So the name-calling starts, and the Democrats do not know how to deal with this kind of opposition.

The media, in an effort to repeat and promote the propaganda from the White House and to push Obama's agenda, tries to make me the story. I am the story! I can't do anything to your health care. I can't change it. I can't force any change whatsoever on your health care. Somehow I'm the story. You would think that the State-Run Media and the Democrats would learn that trying to make me the story doesn't work. For 21 years they've tried to and I'm still here -- and if I say so myself, bigger, more powerful, more popular, more effective than ever. Right, Zev? (interruption) "And slimmer," exactly right. And slimmer, which makes me even doubly effective and intimidating. So these people trying to make me the story -- me the story! -- when I did nothing but respond to the Speaker of the House saying that people on my side of this fight "are running around with swastikas," when there wasn't any photo evidence to establish it. So let's go to CNN Headline News, the dutiful State-Controlled Media, the anchor Robin Meade reporting this about Congressman David Scott, who is a Democrat from Georgia.


MEADE: A Georgia congressman who supports health care reform found a swastika painted outside his office. Democrat David Scott says that it should remind people to tone down the rhetoric. Well, several conservatives have made Nazi references about health care reform including radio host Rush Limbaugh.

RUSH ARCHIVE: [Y]ou will find that the Obama health care logo is damn close to a Nazi swastika logo.

MEADE: Congressman Scott's office was vandalized less than a week after he got into a heated argument about health care at a community meeting.

RUSH: I'm sorry, folks, I don't buy this. This is too politically convenient. We know that Obama staged an event yesterday. The Democrats are staging events. It's what they do. They don't deal in reality. They don't tell the truth. I'm not buying that this happened with an angry, anti-health care person putting the swastika. I think the Democrats are doing this themselves trying to make it an issue, because they know that dummkopfs like this infobabe are going to blame it on me. I did find similarities, scary similarities between the Obama "Health Care Now" logo and something the Nazis used to use and we morphed it at my website, RushLimbaugh.com, and it is dangerously close. Now, there's no swastika in Obama's logo. I'm just talking about the entire shape of the thing -- and nobody's saying Obama's Hitler.

Everybody seems to be forget that Pelosi started all of this. The Democrats started all of this. (interruption) Well, maybe you're right, Snerdley. Snerdley just shouted at me over the IFB, "They're not forgetting!" But somebody like Robin Meade at CNN Headline News may not know. It's entirely possible that many people in the State-Run Media don't know because if the truth isn't on the sites they read the, quote, unquote, "truth," they'll never know. So CNN's "American Morning" today, the cohost Kiran Chetry is interviewing Representative David Scott (Democrat-Georgia). She says, "What is it about this health care debate that seems to have brought out the worst in so many people as we're discussing what everybody wants which is to figure out solutions to our collective programs?"

SCOTT: My situation in all of this has been a realization that it has become politicized. From the very beginning, when Rush Limbaugh says, "Well, we don't want him to succeed. We don't want President Obama to succeed. I want him to fail." Well, Rush Limbaugh has an extraordinary audience. And many of them feel very strongly and are influenced by him.

RUSH: Right.

SCOTT: The tone has been set there, so you find people who will come in and hijack these meetings for the purpose of spreading that.

RUSH: Here they go in denial again. They're trying to tell themselves this. What these people do is project. What the liberal Democrats do they're the ones that are the professional protesters. They have the professional rent-a-mobs -- ACORN, the union people -- and they're just projecting. Well, this can't be real because what they do isn't real. And so happening to them on the reverse it's gotta be made up, it's gotta be trumped up. Yes I wanted Obama to fail and I think everybody understands how what I meant, finally. I think most people understood when I meant at the time anyway. There was just shock and dismay that anybody would have the gonads to say it! But I knew all of this was coming down the pike before it happened.


Why? Because I know socialists. I know liberals. I know what Bill Ayers stands for. I know what Reverend Wright stands for., I know who Obama is. I know who Pelosi is. None of this is a mystery. We knew they were going to try this. But, no, some people are holding out hope, "He's going to be a great moderate governing from the center. Sssssss! He's going to triangulate, post-racial, post-partisan." BS. It was all BS. Yes, I wanted him to fail. Sadly for the country, he's succeeding, which means the country is failing. Three million jobs lost since he's immaculated? How's that hope and change working out for you?

See the latest on the stimulus numbers? Fifty-some-odd gazillion dollars spent on airports -- how is that working out? -- while they're telling everybody not to fly because it's polluting the planet. Now let's go to audio sound bite 27. Yesterday at a John Dingell town hall or some sort of meeting there was a guy, a black guy carrying around a sign, Obama as Hitler, swastika, whatever it was. It was an Obama has Hitler sign. And this is why I don't believe that this swastika painted on the office door at what's-his-face, David Scott's office, is anything other than politically convenient. The guest here is Bill Cornish. He's a Dingell town hall attendee talking to Neil Cavuto and here's the exchange.

CORNISH: There was actually a gentleman in there carrying around a sign outside with Obama as Hitler, and it turned out later he was outside handing out Dingell information on the health care program. So it appears that he was part of the Dingell operation.

RUSH: So, the Dingell operation grabbed a black guy, gave him a sign, "Obama is Hitler," had him parading around outside for the cameras to catch, and then after the meeting this Dingell worker ditches the sign and is passing out Dingell information. We have proof of this from a blog called "The Blog Prof." Here's the money paragraph in this blog: Note man holding up the poster," and there are pictures here and screen shots from YouTube. "This screen shot was used in reports by [the state-controlled media] who painted the protesters at Dingell's place as Nazis. Here's the thing, though. That black man is a Dingell supporter. Last Friday, Frank Beckmann" on our Detroit affiliate, WJR "interviewed an eyewitness that said not only were union let in through a side door before anyone else was let into the venue but that he clearly saw from his vantage point that very Obama-as-Hitler poster in the back hallway after the [union thugs] took their seats.

"The interview was around 11 a.m., but WJR chose not to post the audio, thought it would have been bigger news and needed more than just to write a post, albeit an audio clip would have partially sacrificed." In any case, the blogger has been scouring YouTube and the web for more info, finally found some, and there's an account of all of this. So the bottom line is that at Dingell's town hall, the Obama-as-Hitler sign was being paraded around by a Dingell supporter. This is what I predicted yesterday prior to the Obama town hall in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. So today we conveniently see on the Drudge Report page a picture of the office of Congressman David Scott in Georgia with a swastika painted on it -- and, of course, I am responsible, when Nancy Pelosi put the thought into everybody's head.

The bottom line here is that the Democrats and Obama cannot defend their plan. They cannot answer questions about their plan. So once again they are making me the issue in trying to not advance their plan, but to discredit critics of the plan.


BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, I'm not going to let this Nazi thing go. I'm going to get back to it. I'm not going to let this Nazi thing go, this swastika thing go, because the Democrats here -- in an effort to divert everybody's attention from what's in this rotten piece of legislation called health care reform -- are once again taking a page out of the playbook and trying to make this about me. Once again I'm sitting here, minding my own business one day and I see Nancy Pelosi say that all these peaceful people showing up at these town hall meetings on health care are caring swastikas. She's calling us Nazis. I responded in kind, and I understand why they don't like it. But I need to ask a question here. The reason we're not supposed to talk about the Nazis is because of the genocide of six million Jews. So no comparison to Nazi Germany and German socialism is allowed.

We can't go there simply because of the genocide of six million Jews. When Pelosi starts calling and saying people are running around "carrying swastikas," that is what she means. She is trying to associate people like you and me with that event in the world. I'm tell you, folks, I'm not going to sit here and take it anymore. I am not going to sit idly by while a bunch of fascist socialists in this country try to smear and impugn mainstream conservatism rooted in the founding of this country with a genocide of six million Jews in World War II. That's what they are trying to do. That's the association they are trying to link. As such, everybody is afraid to bring up Germany in World War II because that's all anybody is going to think. So when you say somebody is like Hitler, "Oh, you can't say that! Nobody is as bad as Hitler!" Well, let me make a point. The Nazis were National Socialists.

Forget the genocide here. That came toward the end of what they were doing. They got started in the mid-thirties or a little prior to that. Don't forget what they were doing. But they were National Socialists. They were not liberty loving individuals. They did not preach respect for human beings. They were not for small, decentralized government anywhere. They were not for honest capitalism. They were National Socialists, and it was National Socialism -- and the view of big government, and the idea that some were better than others -- which led to that monstrous genocide. The two are not separately contained, and to sit here and be compared to the monstrous genocidal Adolf Hitler, that's beyond the pale. And that's what Pelosi and that's what Dingell is trying to do when he has one of his run around with a swastika or Obama-is-Hitler sign.

Why...? Why do we have to ignore all of the National Socialism of Nazi Germany just because much the monstrous genocide? This experiment in National Socialism in Germany went on for well over ten years. And I'm going to tell you right now: If you want to do a comparison just taking this health care bill... If you want to do a comparison between the people pushing it and the people opposing it, to National Socialism in Germany, it ain't a contest. The people pushing this health care bill have far more in common with the National Socialists of Germany (exempting genocide) than any of us who are opposing this health care have. We are not in any realm close. Now, the people in the media look at this as just an opportunity to divert attention, to attack me. They love doing it. It gets them ratings. They love to make this association between conservatism and Nazism.

Nothing could be further from the truth in any aspect of Nazism. We are for capitalism, small, limited government, individual liberty and freedom. We have nothing in common -- and the right has never had anything in common -- with any socialism anywhere, including Nazism. You want to put it on a...? The wrong way to look at this is a circle. You need to draw a straight line and put your precious moderates and independents in the middle, put conservatives on the right. On the left you're going to find Nazism, socialism, communism. You're not going to find it on the right. It ain't going to happen. So these people want to continue to try to say -- and we know that Dingell is out there having one of his own staffers running around with a sign. We know full well what they're trying to do.

That's fake just like Obama's town hall meeting was fake yesterday. I'm just going to tell you: There is no way conservatives, were we writing a health bill -- and we have our own versions. There is no way ever, any time, anywhere that we make a serious proposal that the government decides who dies based on their age and health. That's not who we are, for whatever reason. To us, health care is not about money. It's not about saving money, not about controlling money. Health care is about health. Health care is about health care. It's not about insurance. It's not about money. It's not bang for the buck. Conservatives don't demonize, as a matter of political course, to advance our ideas. People who are exercising individual freedom and liberty to advance those same notions, capitalism in the country, we do not look at this country and instinctively dislike it, hate it, demonize it, want to change it.


We're trying to save it against a full-fledged onslaught that by virtue of votes in the House and Senate can't be stopped. So what are we supposed to do at town hall meetings? What's the purpose here? What's the purpose of a town hall meeting? Is it so politicians can come and pass down from on high what they're doing without challenge? Or is the purpose of a town hall meeting to hear from constituents? We don't need to go to a town hall meeting to have a report from these clowns of what they're doing. The purpose of the town hall meeting is for them to hear us. And what if during a period of town hall meetings a politician starts supporting legislation that's so un-American, so freedom-destroying, so repulsive to what their constituents want?

Then what should those constituents do? If they say very meekly, "Congressman, I don't think that's a very good idea. I want to stay civil with you and I -- I -- I want to talk," is that the way to stand up against things that are being forced down your throat that you think are un-American and going to destroy your freedom and liberty and maybe the country? Or should they really display how mad they are about it? What if -- what if, what if -- there was an actual plan to euthanize everybody over 70? Just playing hypothetical here. What if there was? Would that be enough for people to be justified for yelling at their congressman? Or are we still supposed to pretend it's the Oxford Debating Society? "Congressman, I really think that that's going a bit far." Why do you draw the line here?

It seems like it's okay to act up all you want -- you can maim, you can destroy, you can firebomb, you can blow up things -- if what you're doing is supporting a liberal issue. But if you are a conservative, you're supposed to slink to the background and make sure you don't offend anyone with your passion while we sit and watch the left routinely use intimidation and threats to get what they want. There's no mention whatsoever of the busloads of SEIU union thugs showing up at these town hall meetings. No mention of all of the union supporters for the National Education Association. No mention of ACORN people being employed by the White House to advance a plan that they know nobody wants. No reporting on that. That's just standard, ordinary procedure. That's fine. That's democracy. But people standing up and saying, "Stop it!"

"Why, that's a tactical problem. That's going to give Obama victory on a silver platter. We can't appear to be mad." It's too late for that. People ought to be mad about this. They ought to be mad about what is being attempted. And more and more people are finding out about this. They are finding out about it, and they're also finding out that when they confront their members of Congress with incontrovertible evidence of what's in it simply by reading them the plan, the member of Congress says, "Well, that's a vicious rumor. You don't know what you're talking about! Of course that's not in the bill. I can't believe that you're saying that. That's a malicious rumor going around."

Who is it that is making nice with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Who is it that's making nice with the Castros? Who is it that's making nice with Hugo Chavez? Who is it that's putting pressure on the Jews in Israel to stop defending themselves and building homes? Who is it who went to Cairo and compared the Holocaust to what the Israelis did to defend themselves against Hamas in Gaza? It's this president, Barack Obama, and this administration -- and that's the Democrat Party. We're not supposed to be upset. We're supposed to be pliant, malleable, flaked and formed. We're supposed to be model, polite citizens, while this guy makes nice with sworn enemies of this country. I've never had a friend like Khalidi who hates Jews.

I've never had a friend like Reverend Wright. I don't hang around with sick people who hate aspects of the United States of America. I don't hang around with anti-Semites and I don't hang around with racists. But they're all over this administration. They're all over the people who support this administration. And we're supposed to sit here and act nice! We had a black conservative beat up in Mehlville, Missouri, by a black member of the Service Employees International Union, the SEIU union. We're supposed to not "provoke" them anymore. We didn't provoke them at all. If we did it's with ideas by rejecting what they're doing. They're the ones who got all this incivility started when Obama's crowd shows up.


BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Brian in North Barrington, Illinois. Great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.

CALLER: Mega dittos, Rush. Thanks for taking my call.

RUSH: Thank you.

CALLER: Hey, you know, I'm glad you got back to that "this has nothing to do with health care." You know, what you read earlier in the hour is nothing short in my mind of a declaration of war. It's a war against our Constitution, and the reason people are so frustrated at these events is because we're under attack. What is the difference of Germany taking over France or Japan taking over the Philippines?

RUSH: Well, wait, wait. Wait a minute. In the case of Germany they did it with tanks, armaments. If you want to say that Obama and his people declared war on the founding of the country and so on forth, I understand what you mean. I do think people could understand liberals... If you listen to liberals, if you listen to the media, conservatives are a bigger threat to this country than, say, Ahmadinejad. You never hear Obama talking about Ahmadinejad or the Drive-By Media talking about Ahmadinejad the way they talk about me (laughing), for example, and I don't have any divisions. (interruption) Well, I don't have... (interruption) I don't have... (interruption) No, Snerdley, I don't have armed divisions. I can't order them to war.


END TRANSCRIPT

 

[edthecynic]

Did Democrats Plant Swastikas?
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I told you this was going to happen,

This reminds me of LimpBoy denying he ever used Obama's middle name and claiming that it was the Clinton machine who first used his middle name. And of course, he claimed he had "proof."
His proof was Bob Kerrey countering the GOP using Obama's middle name for MORE than a year already. LimpBoy had used Obama's middle name himself more than a whole year BEFORE Kerrey and LimpBoy was not the first GOP shill to use it. But the truth never stopped LimpBoy from lying.
Check out the dates of these quotes and enjoy LimpBoy's denials.

Laura Ingraham Interviews Rush on Fox News Channel
March 3, 2008
RUSH: Who was it that first used Obama's middle name of Hussein? It was not us. It was Bob Kerrey, over and over again, former Democrat senator of Nebraska.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/16/kerrey_for_clinton.html
December 16, 2007
KERREY: I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama,

Stop the Tape: Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears
Stop the Tape: Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears
Dec 13, 2006
RUSH: (interruption) Snerdley is convinced that Maureen wants Barack Hussein Obama.
(sigh) I don't even want to go there.

Truth Detector: MoDo and Barack Hussein Odumbo
Dec 14, 2006
RUSH: I mean you know me, if the guy's sensitive about his big ears, we need to give him a new name, like Dumbo. But that doesn't quite get it. How about Barack Hussein Odumbo.

Rush On A Roll: Barack Hussein Odumbo, Day Three
Rush On A Roll: Barack Hussein Odumbo, Day Three
Barack Hussein Odumbo, Day Three.
December 15, 2006.
"Senator Barack Obama is concerned about his personal security,

RushLimbaugh.com Home - Tuesday January 16
January 16, 2007
RUSH: Well, this is hilarious. The media, the drive-bys, are in the midst of Obama-gasms. Because Obama -- that would be Barack Hussein Obama -- has announced the perfunctory and predictable exploratory committee to go out there and ask people what they think he ought to do.

Obama Displays Maturity, Laughs Off "Barack the 'Magic Negro'" Song
May 2, 2007

EIB Callers on William F. Buckley
February 28, 2008
RUSH: I gave you all of the examples of the Clinton campaign and their personal attacks against Obama. He's selling drugs, not just using them. His middle name was Hussein, he may be a terrorist! Bob Kerrey -- and of course they go out and apologize for all this. But notice the MO. They put all these things in the public domain.
Then you have the first Republican [Cunningham] that happens to use Obama's middle name, the entire left has a conniption fit, and points fingers. "This is outrageous, these personal attacks must stop."

After getting no traction with his LIE that Kerrey was the first he then accused Obama of being the first to use his own middle name even though LimpBoy himself beat Obama by 10 months, and again LimpBoy was not the First GOP waterboy to use it.

McCain Issues Strict Talking Points
March 12, 2008
RUSH: Do you know who the first person who started this Hussein business, the first person to use the middle name of Barack Obama, was? It was Barack Obama. This was October 18th, 2007, talking to Tavis Smiley, PBS. "Well, I think if you've got a guy named Barack Hussein Obama, that's a pretty good contrast to George W. Bush...." The point being that on October 18th of last year it was Obama himself using his middle name, saying the fact that my middle name is Hussein and whatever connotations are attached to it, why, this is going to help bring us together. This is going to help America heal. This is going to increase our standing in the world.
How do we deal with this, folks? Obama was the first to use his middle name. He did so in the context of healing and improving our standing in the world, and now McCain has ordered nobody to use the middle name.

Drive-Bys Focus on Imus Again, While Democrats Display Real Racism
June 24, 2008
SNERDLEY: This is Bo Snerdley, official EIB Obama criticizer, certified black enough to criticize. I have a statement. ... the Hussein thing, all that came from Democrats.
Senator Ken Salazar Stands in the Way of Lower Gas Prices
July 23, 2008
RUSH: This is why I'm host and you are the Official Obama Criticizer working off a script.(interruption) Jeez.

Obama's "Muslim Faith" Slip Bolstered by Moammar Khadafy
September 9, 2008
RUSH: I'm reminded by my friend Andy McCarthy at National Review that it was Obama himself who started this Hussein business. Bret Stephens actually had it in a Wall Street Journal column yesterday. Who said this? "Well, I think if you've got a guy named Barack Hussein Obama, that's a pretty good contrast to George W. Bush." Who said that? Moammar Khadafy, uh, Ayman al-Zawahiri, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Answer, none of the above. "Well, I think if you've got a guy named Barack Hussein Obama, that's a pretty good contrast to George W. Bush." That was stated by Barack Obama.

And here he is denying that he CONSTANTLY uses Obama's middle name and playing the perpetual victim by accusing the media of "mischaracterizing" him, so here are some times he used Obama's middle name in addition to the ones above where he beat Kerrey and Obama and Cunningham.

Drive-Bys Mischaracterize Rush in the Barack Hussein Obama Flap
Drive-Bys Mischaracterize Rush in the Barack Hussein Obama Flap
February 28, 2008
RUSH: Likewise with this Hussein name business. If I've read it once today, I've read it twice that I constantly refer to Obama using his middle name, which I don't!

The Democrat Party Uncivil War
January 14, 2008
RUSH: the "man of hope," Barack Hussein Obama

RushLimbaugh.com Home - Friday February 29
February 29, 2008
RUSH: The Real Fear Bomb Is the Word "Liberal" and We Will Keep Using It
We don't call him Hussein. We do call him "liberal."

Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page
March 13, 2008
RUISH: Next box: "Barack Hussein Obama. Sorry, Senator McCain." Ha!

We Warned Barry of Kneecapping
March 26, 2008
RUSH: We were doing a public service. It was compassion from us here at the EIB Network, to a fellow citizen, Barack Hussein Obama, warning him to be careful.

Harlem Pastor Calls Oprah, Obama, & Rev. Wright "The Trinity of Hell"
May 14, 2008
RUSH: This is last Saturday in Harlem at the World Missionary Church, Pastor James David Manning concluding now about the evil trinity, talk show host Oprah Winfrey, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, and Pastor Jeremiah Wright.

President Bush Blasts Appeasers; Messiah Campaign Goes Ballistic
President Bush Blasts Appeasers; Messiah Campaign Goes Ballistic
May 15, 2008
RUSH: So when Barack Hussein Obama runs around and says he's going to talk with all these leaders, because talking is good, he expects no retort;
RUSH: We're going to have a guy in the White House named Hussein.

Obama to GOP: Lay Off My Wife
May 21, 2008
RUSH: We can't talk about his name, Hussein.

Don't Be Afraid of the Drive-Bys
Don't Be Afraid of the Drive-Bys
Jul 25, 2008
It's going to come down to whether or not the people of this country want Barack Hussein Obama to be President of the United States and whether they want Michelle (My Belle) Obama to be the first lady of the United States. It's going to come down to that.

Obama Solves Energy Crisis: Inflate Your Tires
July 31, 2008
RUSH: Obama just got through telling us, keep your tires inflated and get your car tuned up so we won't have to drill. So here's an oil sheik, who, Obama, middle name Hussein, guy must know what he's talking about,

Barry Mocks "Drill Here. Drill Now."
August 5, 2008
RUSH: In a sane political environment, Barack Hussein Obama would be a laughingstock, along with much of his party.

Axelrod Told Us to Use His Name, So What's Wrong with Hussein?
October 9, 2008
RUSH: They are! You said he's got a name, and so we're using his name, Barack Hussein Obama.

Lie, deny and blame everyone else has been LimpBoy's MO for as long as he's been on GOP Hate-Run media, how can anyone ever believe this pathological GOP liar???

 

[Liability]

Is everyone else as amused as I am by the crystal clear obvious conclusion that EdTheLyingMoron is in love with Rush Limbaugh?

Nobody can be THAT obsessed and not be in love.

 

[edthecynic]

Is everyone else as amused as I am by the crystal clear obvious conclusion that EdTheLyingMoron is in love with Rush Limbaugh?

Nobody can be THAT obsessed and not be in love.

Either that OR I "love" making you Ditto-Nazis eat your MessiahRushie's words.

Again, your post becomes an example of the techniques CON$ use.
A person is accused first of not listening enough to LimpBoy and therefore getting their impression of LimpBoy from Lib sites and when they can't produce any Lib site with your quotes and arguments, you are negated for listening TOO MUCH!!!

Now notice LIEability never addresses LimpBoy's MO of saying something then denying he said it, and then playing the perpetual victim falsely portrayed by the evil media.

There is no rebuttal to my examples so a dedicated Ditto-Nazi in programmed to attack me personally. He can't deny LimpBoy used Obama's middle name long before the people he accuses of "STARTING IT."
So the attack is made at ME so he can rationalize that his MessiahRushie still has a 99.1% "accuracy" rating (from a real estate appraiser, the Sullivan Group).

The reality LIEability won't face is LimpBoy has a PAST of rationalizing that it's someone else's fault he started it.

To the wicked, everything serves as pretext.
Voltaire

 

[anna]

perp walk and impeachment for the son of malcolm x!!