if all you can do is post stupid shit like this, stop postingperp walk and impeachment for the son of malcolm x!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if all you can do is post stupid shit like this, stop postingperp walk and impeachment for the son of malcolm x!!
if all you can do is post stupid shit like this, stop postingperp walk and impeachment for the son of malcolm x!!
thats because you are a fucking moronif all you can do is post stupid shit like this, stop postingperp walk and impeachment for the son of malcolm x!!
Oh pleez do not let this weak minded diver drive you from USMB. He is suffering from a bad gas mix and his mind isn't clear yet.
I encourage all neo con christian fascist traitors to make statements in support of your true colors.
thats because you are a fucking moronif all you can do is post stupid shit like this, stop posting
Oh pleez do not let this weak minded diver drive you from USMB. He is suffering from a bad gas mix and his mind isn't clear yet.
I encourage all neo con christian fascist traitors to make statements in support of your true colors.
thats because you are a fucking moronOh pleez do not let this weak minded diver drive you from USMB. He is suffering from a bad gas mix and his mind isn't clear yet.
I encourage all neo con christian fascist traitors to make statements in support of your true colors.
When you point a finger at me and call me a fucking moron there are three fingers pointing back at you. And a thumb...the thumb is optional.
This is another example of the colossal stupidity CON$ try to pass off as "logic."A Duke Professor Explains What the Health Care Bill Actually Says
RUSH: "Pages 149-150, SEC. 313, EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN LIEU OF COVERAGE," and then the relevant passages from the bill. Here is the evaluation of those passages. Again, what we're talking about here is: "Will the PLAN destroy private health insurance?" "1. The bill does not prohibit a person from buying private insurance. 2. Small businesses -- with say 8-10 employees -- will either have to provide insurance to federal standards, or pay an 8% payroll tax. Business costs for health care are higher than this, especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" Now, let me explain this. Small businesses, say eight-to-ten employees, will either have to provide insurance up "to federal standards." If they don't, they will pay an additional 8% payroll tax.
"Business costs for health care are higher than [what will be charged], especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" If they go to the government option, they're fine. If you don't and you stay private, you're going to pay a penalty. The penalty will make it ridiculous and stupid business-wise to stay with your private plan. Therefore, you will -- your small business will -- be forced out of private insurance onto the government option. "3. The pressure for business owners to terminate the private plans will be enormous," the financial pressure, the business pressure. "4. With employers ending plans, millions of Americans will lose their private coverage, and fewer companies will offer it."
thats because you are a fucking moron
When you point a finger at me and call me a fucking moron there are three fingers pointing back at you. And a thumb...the thumb is optional.
You must be a lower life form if your thumb points back at you when you point.
All he said was that you are a {bleeping} moron. You clearly are.
When you point a finger at me and call me a fucking moron there are three fingers pointing back at you. And a thumb...the thumb is optional.
You must be a lower life form if your thumb points back at you when you point.
All he said was that you are a {bleeping} moron. You clearly are.
Its not that hard to do. Pretend you are mimicking shooting a pistol. Undergetit?
sheeesh, that moron got it SO wrongYou must be a lower life form if your thumb points back at you when you point.
All he said was that you are a {bleeping} moron. You clearly are.
Its not that hard to do. Pretend you are mimicking shooting a pistol. Undergetit?
My thumb still doesn't point back at me, you nitwit.
Maybe yours does.
And the other fingers? They tend to curl, and to the extent that's pointing at all, it's pointed at right angles between where the forefinger is pointed and the person doing the pointing.
No. The obvious truth is this: when someone points a finger at you, you and you alone are being pointed at.
Deal with it.
sheeesh, that moron got it SO wrongIts not that hard to do. Pretend you are mimicking shooting a pistol. Undergetit?
My thumb still doesn't point back at me, you nitwit.
Maybe yours does.
And the other fingers? They tend to curl, and to the extent that's pointing at all, it's pointed at right angles between where the forefinger is pointed and the person doing the pointing.
No. The obvious truth is this: when someone points a finger at you, you and you alone are being pointed at.
Deal with it.
when you point a finger at someone you point 3 back at yourself and one at God
![]()
You must be a lower life form if your thumb points back at you when you point.
All he said was that you are a {bleeping} moron. You clearly are.
Its not that hard to do. Pretend you are mimicking shooting a pistol. Undergetit?
My thumb still doesn't point back at me, you nitwit.
Maybe yours does.
And the other fingers? They tend to curl, and to the extent that's pointing at all, it's pointed at right angles between where the forefinger is pointed and the person doing the pointing.
No. The obvious truth is this: when someone points a finger at you, you and you alone are being pointed at.
Deal with it.
This is another example of the colossal stupidity CON$ try to pass off as "logic."A Duke Professor Explains What the Health Care Bill Actually Says
RUSH: "Pages 149-150, SEC. 313, EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN LIEU OF COVERAGE," and then the relevant passages from the bill. Here is the evaluation of those passages. Again, what we're talking about here is: "Will the PLAN destroy private health insurance?" "1. The bill does not prohibit a person from buying private insurance. 2. Small businesses -- with say 8-10 employees -- will either have to provide insurance to federal standards, or pay an 8% payroll tax. Business costs for health care are higher than this, especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" Now, let me explain this. Small businesses, say eight-to-ten employees, will either have to provide insurance up "to federal standards." If they don't, they will pay an additional 8% payroll tax.
"Business costs for health care are higher than [what will be charged], especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" If they go to the government option, they're fine. If you don't and you stay private, you're going to pay a penalty. The penalty will make it ridiculous and stupid business-wise to stay with your private plan. Therefore, you will -- your small business will -- be forced out of private insurance onto the government option. "3. The pressure for business owners to terminate the private plans will be enormous," the financial pressure, the business pressure. "4. With employers ending plans, millions of Americans will lose their private coverage, and fewer companies will offer it."
Right now businesses that have private health care plans are competing against businesses that have NO health care and therefore NO health care expenses. That sure seems like a financial disadvantage for the businesses that provide private health care plans, yet they have private plans!!!
So LimpBoy tries to convince the people, stupid enough to believe him, that requiring the businesses that do not provide health care to provide health care that meets the Gov standard or be fined, in other words increasing the costs of these businesses with NO plan, that this will make the businesses that already have private plans LESS competitive against businesses that didn't have these extra expenses before, unless the businesses that provide private plans leave their private plan.
He then argues the businesses that have private plans will be forced by competition to leave their private plans thus causing the elimination of all private plans.
If they are successfully competing against businesses with NO health care expenses now, how exactly will requiring their competition to take on the ADDED expense of health care or the expense of a fine put them at a greater competitive disadvantage??????
And there are people stupid enough to think LimpBoy is "brilliant."![]()
Nice try Ed you got it wrong as usual. Right now most if not all companies with 5 to 10 employees don't pay for their employees health coverage if they even offer it at all. They simply don't have sufficient money to do so. Under this plan they are all going to be required to furnish sonething or pay the fee most if not all of them will take the lower cost, assuming they don't simply go belly up because they simply don't have a the money to do either. The catch comes in with larger companies. If I'm running company xyz and I have a choice between furnishing private insurance for all my employees at 200k a year or putting them on the government plan for half that cost I'd have to be an idiot not to put them on the government plan.
This is another example of the colossal stupidity CON$ try to pass off as "logic."A Duke Professor Explains What the Health Care Bill Actually Says
RUSH: "Pages 149-150, SEC. 313, EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN LIEU OF COVERAGE," and then the relevant passages from the bill. Here is the evaluation of those passages. Again, what we're talking about here is: "Will the PLAN destroy private health insurance?" "1. The bill does not prohibit a person from buying private insurance. 2. Small businesses -- with say 8-10 employees -- will either have to provide insurance to federal standards, or pay an 8% payroll tax. Business costs for health care are higher than this, especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" Now, let me explain this. Small businesses, say eight-to-ten employees, will either have to provide insurance up "to federal standards." If they don't, they will pay an additional 8% payroll tax.
"Business costs for health care are higher than [what will be charged], especially considering administrative costs. Any competitive business that tries to stay with a private plan will face a payroll disadvantage against competitors who go with the government 'option.'" If they go to the government option, they're fine. If you don't and you stay private, you're going to pay a penalty. The penalty will make it ridiculous and stupid business-wise to stay with your private plan. Therefore, you will -- your small business will -- be forced out of private insurance onto the government option. "3. The pressure for business owners to terminate the private plans will be enormous," the financial pressure, the business pressure. "4. With employers ending plans, millions of Americans will lose their private coverage, and fewer companies will offer it."
Right now businesses that have private health care plans are competing against businesses that have NO health care and therefore NO health care expenses. That sure seems like a financial disadvantage for the businesses that provide private health care plans, yet they have private plans!!!
So LimpBoy tries to convince the people, stupid enough to believe him, that requiring the businesses that do not provide health care to provide health care that meets the Gov standard or be fined, in other words increasing the costs of these businesses with NO plan, that this will make the businesses that already have private plans LESS competitive against businesses that didn't have these extra expenses before, unless the businesses that provide private plans leave their private plan.
He then argues the businesses that have private plans will be forced by competition to leave their private plans thus causing the elimination of all private plans.
If they are successfully competing against businesses with NO health care expenses now, how exactly will requiring their competition to take on the ADDED expense of health care or the expense of a fine put them at a greater competitive disadvantage??????
And there are people stupid enough to think LimpBoy is "brilliant."![]()
Nice try Ed you got it wrong as usual. Right now most if not all companies with 5 to 10 employees don't pay for their employees health coverage if they even offer it at all. They simply don't have sufficient money to do so. Under this plan they are all going to be required to furnish sonething or pay the fee most if not all of them will take the lower cost, assuming they don't simply go belly up because they simply don't have a the money to do either. The catch comes in with larger companies. If I'm running company xyz and I have a choice between furnishing private insurance for all my employees at 200k a year or putting them on the government plan for half that cost I'd have to be an idiot not to put them on the government plan.
Read it again, what you say isn't even close to what LimpBoy was saying.
He is undeniably saying that Companies of 8 to 10 employees with private plans will not be able to compete with similar sized companies who are forced to take on the added expense of a plan or fine. His moronic "logic" is, it was easier to compete with them when their health care expenses were ZERO.![]()
Rush didn't get it quite right either but your explanation of his error was even more off base than he was ed.
RUSH: By the way, I don't know if you've seen this video of Clinton, but I would caution the president to behave better at these meetings. I mean here he is out there screaming, he's raising his voice, his arms are flailing around out there, ... I mean, it's disruptive and it's distracting. It's not presidential. Waving your arms around out there, pointing that big, long finger at people. I think he should behave better.
END TRANSCRIPT