Target security guard slugs female shopper in the face after she demanded her $1,000 bill be paid by 'reparations'

[EvilEyeFleegle]

There was no spin, the NYpost, reported on this story honestly here, along with the video for you;

Target security guard punches customer in the face after she demanded ‘reparations’

The ugly incident happened in October at the megastore in Blue Ash, Ohio and began when Karen Ivery asked a cashier for their manager regarding the bill and reparations.

nypost.com

She was more than likely, punched, and then arrested, because she trespassed into a private area, as reported here,

". . . When he tried to shut the door, Ivery allegedly forced her way in and Cotter threw a punch, according to the report.

Surveillance footage of the incident reported on by the Daily Mail shows the staffer’s punch caused the woman to hit the floor.

After reviewing footage of the incident, authorities wrote that they determined Ivery was the “aggressor” and she was placed under arrest.

“Ivery was confrontational with officers on the scene and didn’t want to explain her actions,” the report states.. . ."

The spin? Is here,

'This is my Rosa Parks moment': Woman demanding reparations at Target punched during altercation

During the October 2022 altercation, 37-year-old Karen Ivery said she wanted a portion of her Target purchase to be paid for as reparations.

www.abcactionnews.com

But? By all means, keep digging.

Nope...just...nope.
Your alleged 'spin' article is not favorable to the women, in fact, it makes her look totally crazy.

Now, if you are making an argument for semantically slanted and selective language..you got one. However, the exact same thing can be said of the first article.

Example: Article 1---

When he tried to shut the door, Ivery allegedly forced her way in and Cotter threw a punch . Surveillance footage of the incident reported on by the Daily Mail shows the staffer’s punch caused the woman to hit the floor.

Article 2---The manager said he attempted to close his office door, according to the police report, but Ivery entered. The surveillance footage shows the manager punching her once in the face, with Ivery falling to the ground.


Article 1 uses the phrase "forced her way in" vs Article 2's "The manager said he attempted to close his office door, according to the police report, but Ivery entered"

'forced her way in' certainly has a higher semantic load than 'Ivery entered'.

Of course, the second article using the woman's name--'Ivery falling to the ground'--humanizes her and is a more subtly sensitive usage....it might engender sympathy for 'Ivery'


But as spin rising to the level you are alleging? Nah..not seeing it. Just the usual stylistic differences between writers and the demographic being courted.

 

[gipper]

The law doesn't give a fuck what you disagree with.

If you think you have the right to punch a woman in the face who is verbally threathening you, you’re fooling yourself.

 

[Ralph Norton]

If you think you have the right to punch a woman in the face who is verbally threathening you, you’re fooling yourself.

Did you read the article, dumb ass?:
'After reviewing footage of the incident, authorities wrote that they determined Ivery was the “aggressor” and she was placed under arrest.'

You should stop before making a further fool of yourself.
(but you won't)

 

[MisterBeale]

Nope...just...nope.
Your alleged 'spin' article is not favorable to the women, in fact, it makes her look totally crazy.

Now, if you are making an argument for semantically slanted and selective language..you got one. However, the exact same thing can be said of the first article.

Example: Article 1---


Article 2---The manager said he attempted to close his office door, according to the police report, but Ivery entered. The surveillance footage shows the manager punching her once in the face, with Ivery falling to the ground.


Article 1 uses the phrase "forced her way in" vs Article 2's "The manager said he attempted to close his office door, according to the police report, but Ivery entered"

'forced her way in' certainly has a higher semantic load than 'Ivery entered'.

Of course, the second article using the woman's name--'Ivery falling to the ground'--humanizes her and is a more subtly sensitive usage....it might engender sympathy for 'Ivery'


But as spin rising to the level you are alleging? Nah..not seeing it. Just the usual stylistic differences between writers and the demographic being courted.

Do you enter areas that are restricted?

Were the protesters at the Capitol, the innocent ones, when they entered a restricted area?

Why should the media portray the person who is breaking the law, favorably?

 

[MisterBeale]

(or is it only black women?)

IMO? I think you hit the nail on the head here.

If it had been some irate, cute bitchy little white girl, acting like a Karen, most of these chads, would be singing a different tune.

(oh, oh, Ashli Babbitt was innocent!)

 

[gipper]

Did you read the article, dumb ass?:
'After reviewing footage of the incident, authorities wrote that they determined Ivery was the “aggressor” and she was placed under arrest.'

You should stop before making a further fool of yourself.
(but you won't)

I’m not the fool here. If you think you can hit a woman in the face who is verbally abusive to you, you’re a pussy.

 

[Lisa558]

I’m not the fool here. If you think you can hit a woman in the face who is verbally abusive to you, you’re a pussy.

She was threatening and trespassed into his office. No telling what a delusional woman like that would do.

He had it within his power to do a lot worse. I think he restrained himself, actually. It’s not like he’s that savage who beat the teacher unconscious and then kept pounding on her unconscious body.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Yeah gee I have a thing about people assaulting others

Imagine that

So it was not ok then what SHE did, right?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The punch looked mild to me. He didn‘t wind up for it and was definitely not full force. Just enough to stop her in her tracks.

Plus, he said that he tried to verbally de-escalate things. But this woman was so convinced by leftist nonsense that other people should pay for her $1000 grocery tab since….maybe….an ancestor she never knew might have been a slave.

We need to stop filling black people’s heads with the idea they deserve reparations. This is the result.

GOPers Need to Quit Bragging About Lincoln

Liberals call slavery "America's original sin." But slavery was punishment; a race that acts like wild jungle animals needed to be tamed. What has been going on with them since the race-traitor Kennedys turned them loose should give us a more understanding perspective on our past history with feral threats.

America's contradictory original sin was allowing birth privileges, when that was the very thing that drove untitled Europeans to come here, where they proved they weren't born losers, as they had been told they were for centuries. And we're paying for that sin, not the Preppy Progressives' "original sin," because Whites Who Are Born Rich Deplore, Despise, Hate, and Fear All Other White People.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Dealing with those savages is like dealing with an animal. They only seem to understand being hit when they misbehave.

She was all big stick carrying walking tall until she got knocked on the floor. Then suddenly she sits in the chair and is compliant and behaved.

The Plutes Have Turned Their Lawn Jockeys Loose on Us

 

[Lisa558]

Yeah gee I have a thing about people assaulting others

Imagine that

She assaulted HIM first.

 

[DudleySmith]

Yes, because punching out a mentally ill woman is something you should feel good about, I guess.

Your poor victimized water buffalo was three times the size of the people she was bullying with her idiot psycho rant, basically trying to extort them to get her stuff free. they should have tazed her just for laughs.

 

[Wapasha]

MAGA and Trump are fucked up, but I don’t see them as fundamentally racist. Trump did help get blacks back in the work force in big numbers, prior to Covid.

I have stated many times here had he demanded police reform after the Floyd murder rather than unquestionably supporting police, he gets re-elected easily. He’s just not that smart.

Don't forget that Trump signed an executive order to continually fund Historically Black Colleges and universities and he signed prison reform bill FIRST STEP Act, something that every president before him promised to do, but lied and never actually did.