JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #861
Yes, she is fun to toy with. Her personality reminds me of the ugly girl from 'spinal tap.'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, she is fun to toy with. Her personality reminds me of the ugly girl from 'spinal tap.'
Yes, she is fun to toy with. Her personality reminds me of the ugly girl from 'spinal tap.'
she's way too hateful and angry for me. I really do wish she'd find peace.
CaliforniaGirl is as twisted sick women who parks cars in a British parking building, demeans America and its better parts, and attacks obamacare while using British socialized medicine. Of course she neg reps and won't answer.
She goes hormonal when she sees me addressing one of her sillinesses.![]()
CaliforniaGirl is as twisted sick women who parks cars in a British parking building, demeans America and its better parts, and attacks obamacare while using British socialized medicine. Of course she neg reps and won't answer.
She goes hormonal when she sees me addressing one of her sillinesses.![]()
Gonna sit here and wait for JokeyBoy to provide some evidence of any of his delusional accusations.... which are about as valid as his desire to run me out of a party I don't even belong to. Sad, sad, sad little boy.![]()
CaliforniaGirl is as twisted sick women who parks cars in a British parking building, demeans America and its better parts, and attacks obamacare while using British socialized medicine. Of course she neg reps and won't answer.
She goes hormonal when she sees me addressing one of her sillinesses.![]()
Gonna sit here and wait for JokeyBoy to provide some evidence of any of his delusional accusations.... which are about as valid as his desire to run me out of a party I don't even belong to. Sad, sad, sad little boy.![]()
You're going to be sitting for a long long time. Because JakeStarkey is "King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."
Hail, the King!
More Rich Americans Renounce U.S. Citizenship over Taxes - DailyFinance
Keep in mind that wealthy people represent the dynamic force in our economy, starting businesses, expanding existing businesses or investing in new or starting companies. That they want to take their marbles and leave is a bad sign for us.
"The hard, empirical facts: The tax cuts did not spur investment. Job growth in the George W. Bush years was one-seventh that of the Clinton years."
That 251,000 earner would pay the higher rate on 1,000. If we're talking 36% going to 39%,
they pay an extra 30 bucks.
Just enough to push them over the edge to the point where they pack up and move to some tax-free haven where they can live in freedom!
I'm wondering where all these rich people will be moving to, where they'll get rates in the 10's 20's and low 30's on their first 250,000 of taxable income, and no more than 39% on the rest.
Yes, she is fun to toy with. Her personality reminds me of the ugly girl from 'spinal tap.'
she's way too hateful and angry for me. I really do wish she'd find peace.
Yeah, the anger that infests her is what I do not get. And, yeah, all deserve peace and contentment. I hope she finds it.
More Rich Americans Renounce U.S. Citizenship for Lower Taxes - DailyFinance
Keep in mind that wealthy people represent the dynamic force in our economy, starting businesses, expanding existing businesses or investing in new or starting companies.
"In fact, while the arguments in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy have been known to change over time, the bottom line never does. When Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) introduced a stimulus plan authored by the Heritage Foundation back in 2009, it consisted entirely of making the Bush tax cuts permanent and adding tax breaks for corporations and wealthy Americans. If it had been enacted, the plan would have cost roughly three times what the stimulus packagethen under consideration in Congress, and later passedwas estimated to cost over a period of 10 years. Even Sen. DeMint found it necessary to admit at the time that his plan was not innovative or particularly clever. In fact, its only eleven pages.
During the New Deal the top tax rate grew steadily and unemployment steadily declined.
The top tax rate never got below 91 percent during the 1050s. For most Americans those were good years.
http://www.ctj.org/pdf/regcg.pdf
United States Unemployment Rate 1920?2010 ? Infoplease.com
Since the top tax rate declined below 70 percent real after tax income for at least half of the American population declined, while the rich have gotten richer.
The US had a 3rd world wealth structure prior to the postwar years. Starting in the late 30s, mostly through tax policy, surplus income on top was utilized to expand opportunity for the middle class and build the modern industrial infrastructure upon which commerce depends. Additionally, labor policies were enacted to lift wages and boost the purchasing power of the newly formed middle class (-this was the heyday of American Conservatism because the high wages & benefits along with programs like the GI Bill meant the family could afford to have the mother stay home and raise the kids).
Then came the stagflation of the 70s, caused by the oil shocks and the over-application of Keynesian policies (where inflation undermined the higher wages of the middle class). This allowed the right to raise taxes and get rid of American Labor protections on the promise that this would lead to economic growth. We let Reagan open all barriers to trade; and then we let him remove capital's bondage to American Labor. And - as a result - the wealthy moved all manufacturing to Asian sweat shops where Nike's are made for pennies a day so wealthy investors can make bank.
In addition to being a pompous ass you're just plain stupid.
I thought the Right (whoever they are) wanted to lower taxes to favor the wealthy? Get your misinformation straight.
More Rich Americans Renounce U.S. Citizenship over Taxes - DailyFinance
Keep in mind that wealthy people represent the dynamic force in our economy, starting businesses, expanding existing businesses or investing in new or starting companies. That they want to take their marbles and leave is a bad sign for us.
All you "don't let the screen door hit you where the good Lord split you" liberal class warriors can just STFU now.
Yeah and despite the fact that bush's tax cuts which were supposed to spur growth are still active while the wealthy that you are referring to chose and are choosing to pocket the tax breaks and have not used them to act as the dynamic force in our economy and are now asking for MORE.
Sometimes you have to say enough is enough. If they have the tax cuts but haven't used them for what they claimed they would use them for then why should they get more or even keep what they got??
You mean the tax cuts that are expiring in January? The ones Geithner said he would oppose renewing?
Do you think wealthy people wait around until taxes hit them before they do something?
The economy expanded for 7 years after the tax cuts. To pretend otherwise is the mark of a partisan retard.
Of course look who I'm responding to.