Tea Party Group Banned from Town Hall Because of Maryland Democrats' Smear

[R.D.]

Jake booted little fascist

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Reported. Stay on OP, Frank. You don't get to act like a little storm trooper in public meetings.

Seriously??

 

[JakeStarkey]

the hell we can't...you and no government employee I pay will tell me what to do

lets all be like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton...go to get ourselves arrested then sue their asses...if you're there we'll sue your ass too...lol

So you DO plan to act like assholes and disrupt meetings. Point of the OP made, right there. Thank you.

If I want to I might, that's my right isn't it?
if I get kicked out then so be it..but not before they hear a few choice words...lol

It is not your right to conspire to violate the law

It is not your right to act and break the law

It is everyone's right that if you do conspire to do such that you don't get the opportunity

Thank you very much for validating the OP

 

[JakeStarkey]

Democrats telling lies is not unquestionable evidence. What you advocate is unconstitutional and un-American. But it IS "progressive".

No, and no, and is certainly American. Run along.

Wrong. It's not American. I didn't serve 20 years in uniform so that progressives like you could take away the rights of Americans.

You see the difference between us? I support the rights of every American.

You support the rights only of those you agree with.

How very progressive, Comrade.

Everyone can speak, daveman, if they do not plan to or disrupt the meeting.

You have no right (1) to plan to do such and (2) to carry out such a plan.

 

[daveman]

No, and no, and is certainly American. Run along.

Wrong. It's not American. I didn't serve 20 years in uniform so that progressives like you could take away the rights of Americans.

You see the difference between us? I support the rights of every American.

You support the rights only of those you agree with.

How very progressive, Comrade.

Everyone can speak, daveman, if they do not plan to or disrupt the meeting.

You have no right (1) to plan to do such and (2) to carry out such a plan.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Right, daveman, in a civilized nation we don't have laws that protect the yayhoos from disrupting the public's tax-supported business.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Right, daveman, in a civilized nation we don't have laws that protect the yayhoos from disrupting the public's tax-supported business.

Jake, in America, the government works for the people

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

 

[JakeStarkey]

In America, We the People tell the government what we want it to do for us.

Then it does, and you are bound by that, Frank.

It is called the law.

Don't like it, move on.

 

[daveman]

Right, daveman, in a civilized nation we don't have laws that protect the yayhoos from disrupting the public's tax-supported business.

But the yahoos have to BREAK THOSE LAWS BEFORE YOU PUNISH THEM.

You seem to be incapable of understanding that basic American concept, Comrade.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Right, daveman, in a civilized nation we don't have laws that protect the yayhoos from disrupting the public's tax-supported business.

But the yahoos have to BREAK THOSE LAWS BEFORE YOU PUNISH THEM.

You seem to be incapable of understanding that basic American concept, Comrade.

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

 

[daveman]

Right, daveman, in a civilized nation we don't have laws that protect the yayhoos from disrupting the public's tax-supported business.

But the yahoos have to BREAK THOSE LAWS BEFORE YOU PUNISH THEM.

You seem to be incapable of understanding that basic American concept, Comrade.

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

 

[Zarius]

But the yahoos have to BREAK THOSE LAWS BEFORE YOU PUNISH THEM.

You seem to be incapable of understanding that basic American concept, Comrade.

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

 

[JakeStarkey]

But the yahoos have to BREAK THOSE LAWS BEFORE YOU PUNISH THEM.

You seem to be incapable of understanding that basic American concept, Comrade.

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

That is your contention without proof. Blogs and bigots are not acceptable sources.

 

[daveman]

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

The TEA Party is a hate group only to people who hate freedom.

 

[Zarius]

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

The TEA Party is a hate group only to people who hate freedom.

The tea party is for the advantage of one group of people and the disenfranchising of all others.

 

[Stephanie]

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

so, which one do you belong too, the Democrat-Progressive groups? and why do you do nothing but spread hate?

 

[daveman]

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

That is your contention without proof. Blogs and bigots are not acceptable sources.

Then you must admit that your contention, that the banned TEA Partiers have a history of causing trouble, is without proof and unacceptable.

But you won't. Guaranteed. Because you ALWAYS side with liberals over conservatives.

 

[daveman]

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

The TEA Party is a hate group only to people who hate freedom.

The tea party is for the advantage of one group of people and the disenfranchising of all others.

The TEA Party is for the advantage of all Americans.

Non-Americans SHOULD be disenfranchised.

 

[daveman]

Here's the peace order that the lying Democrat filed:

Don West Peace Order Against Michelle Jefferson

Comrade Fakey, since you side with the lying Democrat, perhaps you could find a news story about any disruption Michelle Jefferson caused?

 

[Avatar4321]

In America, We the People tell the government what we want it to do for us.

Then it does, and you are bound by that, Frank.

It is called the law.

Don't like it, move on.

Odd, that the Supreme Court said just the opposite to the people of California.

And no you still dont have the right to strip someone of their first amendment rights because of something you think they might do.

 

[Avatar4321]

No, you do not have the right to conspire to break laws.

Go read the law.

Go read the OP. The conspiracy was on the part of the Democrats who lied to law enforcement in order to suppress their political enemies' rights.

Of course, you have no problem with that, do you?

Hate groups dont usually get to attend and cause trouble.

Funny. No one has gone to court to prevent Democrats from attending meetings and causing trouble. So your assertion cant possibly be true.