Teaching Anal Sex As "Good" In Schools. Where Is This Heading & Why?

[FJO]

As far as gay adoption is concerned, even though there are some good hearted gay couples who are willing to adopt older kids who would otherwise remain orphans or in foster homes --- I think overall the idea is very bad for society and very bad for almost all children involved. This godless nation has abandoned the meaning of a father and a mother and how a child needs to be raised and nurtured. It is really unbelievable how insane this “affluent” nation has become.

I think leaving children in foster care with no parents because their own mother and father have chosen to abandon them- or abuse them- because you have a problem with homosexuals being parents is cruel to those kids.

100,000 children available for adoption at any time.
33,000 or so of them will wait 3 or more years to be adopted.
Tens of thousands of kids will age out of the system each year- abandoned by the state with no family to support them financially or emotionally at 18 years old.
This is what you prefer rather than allowing a gay woman or a gay couple offer to bring a child into their home and be part of their family.

It is far better for a child to live with caring and loving foster parents - foster mother and foster father - than two moms or two dads of undetermined gender.

My sister-in-law and her husband have been foster parents of a child who is now in his twenties from the time he was three. This child needs to be spoon fed, carried, bathed, dressed and most of all, loved. They have done a super job with the utmost and unselfish love.

Along the way they taught their own child by birth to love and care for his foster sibling.

Thru the years they considered adopting, but they came to realize that the adoption papers are no more meaningful for them than a marriage certificate is to a couple who live together, straight or gay.

 

[FJO]

There will always be bigotry.

Just because its part of the human condition doesn't mean we have to accept it as normal.

Exactly. Now you see why teaching anal sex to children as "OK, normal and good" doesn't mean we have to accept that as normal...

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM)a represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young gay and bisexual men (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24 Gay and Bisexual Men | HIV by Group | HIV/AIDS | CDC

As a hospital ward worker, it must be heart-wrenching to work with youngsters like this whose lives were cut short by learning in school, as sexually-curious/experimental pre-adolescents, that "anal sex is normal and OK"...all as part of the sexualizing of children, promoted by the church of LGBT. What will our society NOT sacrifice as part of this insidious Agenda?

Is that a talking human Dalmatian?

 

[mdk]

There is another thread about Philly schools banning the book Huck Finn....but leftists are OK with this garbage in school? Wake up people

I guarantee you Catcher in the Rye is not only still there but likely favored. They love the explicit gay scenes.

Actually, Cather in the Rye is still one of the most challenged books in schools and libraries according to the ALA.

We can all breath a sigh of relief though since Huck Finn wasn't banned from Philadelphia schools. It was removed from the 11th grade curriculum of Friends' Central School, a private Quaker school (silly but their right) but it will still remain in the library.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Where is it heading ?
Well somebody's ass end I guess.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Another pedophile thread? Come on, guys! not ALL Catholic priests are perverts!

More importantly, among the thousands of pedophiles only a few are Catholic priests. They just get the publicity.
And it's a good bet that many who complained about being abused by priest, saw that as a good opportunity to cash in by socking it to the Church.

I'm going to go out on the limb and take a wild guess, FJO. You are Catholic, aren't you?

 

[koshergrl]

You think 10 and 11 year old girls need to be taught how to properly insert female condoms?

Towards what purpose?

Gays are fucking sick.

No, I don't. Besides, this was never taught in Chicago schools to 10 and 11 years. Sorry if that doesn't fit your and Sil's narrative.

The school referenced in my link was 10-11 y.o. kids.

You know, where the principal came in and told them how to give oral sex.

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio. The other link is about giving explicit instructions to slightly older, but still underaged, girls on how to insert female condoms.

So, despite your desperate grasp via semantics..in my world, I don't want weirdoes in the classroom teaching my underaged children how to better serve sexual perverts, with an eye to how to best hide the fact that they are servicing perverts, thanks.

Instead, I will teach my children not to insert shit into their orifices, and to scream RAPE the minute any queen or lezbo attempts to *teach* them anything.

 

[mdk]

No, I don't. Besides, this was never taught in Chicago schools to 10 and 11 years. Sorry if that doesn't fit your and Sil's narrative.

The school referenced in my link was 10-11 y.o. kids.

You know, where the principal came in and told them how to give oral sex.

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

 

[koshergrl]

The school referenced in my link was 10-11 y.o. kids.

You know, where the principal came in and told them how to give oral sex.

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

 

[Skylar]

No, I don't. Besides, this was never taught in Chicago schools to 10 and 11 years. Sorry if that doesn't fit your and Sil's narrative.

The school referenced in my link was 10-11 y.o. kids.

You know, where the principal came in and told them how to give oral sex.

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio. The other link is about giving explicit instructions to slightly older, but still underaged, girls on how to insert female condoms.

The other link didn't involve any 'slightly older but still underaged girls' receiving any instruction on how to insert female condoms. But instead, slides erroneously included in a parent presentation. From your own article:

“The objectionable material presented at Andrew Jackson Language Academy this week is not and never was part of the student sexual education curriculum. It was mistakenly downloaded and included in the parent presentation, and we agree with parents it is not appropriate for elementary school students,” CPS spokesman Bill McCaffrey said in a statement.

Source: Parents Outraged After School's Sex Health Presentation

http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=abofJid1er37NqadbiUt4I&u=nbcchicago
So so far, the entity of your argument hinges on one Principal in one school going off curriculum answering one question in one class from one student.

And this is the 'homoxsexual agenda'? It seems a little.......singular.

 

[mdk]

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

 

[Syriusly]

As far as gay adoption is concerned, even though there are some good hearted gay couples who are willing to adopt older kids who would otherwise remain orphans or in foster homes --- I think overall the idea is very bad for society and very bad for almost all children involved. This godless nation has abandoned the meaning of a father and a mother and how a child needs to be raised and nurtured. It is really unbelievable how insane this “affluent” nation has become.

I think leaving children in foster care with no parents because their own mother and father have chosen to abandon them- or abuse them- because you have a problem with homosexuals being parents is cruel to those kids.

100,000 children available for adoption at any time.
33,000 or so of them will wait 3 or more years to be adopted.
Tens of thousands of kids will age out of the system each year- abandoned by the state with no family to support them financially or emotionally at 18 years old.
This is what you prefer rather than allowing a gay woman or a gay couple offer to bring a child into their home and be part of their family.

It is far better for a child to live with caring and loving foster parents - foster mother and foster father - than two moms or two dads of undetermined gender.

My sister-in-law and her husband have been foster parents of a child who is now in his twenties from the time he was three. This child needs to be spoon fed, carried, bathed, dressed and most of all, loved. They have done a super job with the utmost and unselfish love.

Along the way they taught their own child by birth to love and care for his foster sibling.

Thru the years they considered adopting, but they came to realize that the adoption papers are no more meaningful for them than a marriage certificate is to a couple who live together, straight or gay.

Well kudo's to your sister-in-law and husband. And I sincerely mean that. I have a sibling and a grandparent who were both foster parents- and I recognize that foster parents play a vital role for the children abandoned by their own parents.

What I don't get is why you assume that all hetero foster parents are caring and loving- and that gay foster parents are not.

Tell me why your wonderful sister in law and husband are 'good foster parents' for doing what they have done- but these men are not?

This all makes the Hastings household presided over by David Upjohn and Andrew Daniels somewhat unusual. David, 59, and Andrew, 47, are foster carers and have also been adoptive parents.

They have been together in a relationship for 24 years, and before they became full-time carers, Andrew taught at a school for children with special needs, and David worked in adult social care.

They first fostered 18 years ago. Then, the idea of two men adopting a child was uncommon, which is partly what led them to foster when, due to Andrew's experience with children with special needs, they were asked if they would look after a boy with severe disabilities. "He wasn't expected to live to his first birthday, although he eventually lived until he was seven and a half," says Andrew.

The death of a child will always be traumatic, but Andrew and David felt compelled to continue.

"He'd taught us so much and we'd developed so many skills … we thought, we can't just leave it. We've got to do something with this knowledge. That's when we decided to carry on fostering children with profound disabilities and terminal conditions."

The couple contacted Credo Care, an organisation that specialises in disability foster placements. Shortly after, Armand arrived.

"He arrived in March, 10 years ago," explains David. Born in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, six-year-old Armand had lived in hospital for most of his short life. A wheelchair user, he has severe learning disabilities, a tracheotomy and is fed through a Peg [percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy].

"He came to us when he was six and was the first one to arrive. Four months later, we had an emergency phone call, asking us if we'd take a boy from Derby. Luke arrived that afternoon. He was 12 and had Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In those days he could shuffle around, but now, he's totally … well, the disease has got hold of his body. He's 22 now. He's a great lad, he really is. He's brilliant."

A couple of months after Luke joined the household, the couple were asked to take Steven, who was five

 

[koshergrl]

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

 

[Syriusly]

No, I don't. Besides, this was never taught in Chicago schools to 10 and 11 years. Sorry if that doesn't fit your and Sil's narrative.

The school referenced in my link was 10-11 y.o. kids.

You know, where the principal came in and told them how to give oral sex.

I didn't see your prior link. The Principle went off the standard curriculum when he answered the question presented by the student. If what those parents claim is correct than I would say he was out of line.

You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio. .

Well show us that quote- because I have gone to that link- and I say you are flat out pulling that crap out of your ass.

This is the quote from your link

Fifth-graders at Onalaska Elementary School were supposed to get a lesson about HIV-AIDS, but the class discussion turned graphic when a child asked about other forms of sexual activity. The principal, who happened to be teaching the class, then told the children about oral and anal sex.

Once again- Kosher is just lying.

 

[Syriusly]

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

Your claim:
No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio

Is the lie.

 

[Syriusly]

BTW, people, as I have said for years...
.

as you have said for years- all sorts of sick, hateful crap.

But facts- those you avoid.

Which is why you won't answer:

In what schools are rogue teachers telling students to go out and try anal sex?

Are you stating that there are no children being taught about anal sex in school?

Parents Furious After School Teaches Graphic Sex Class

Here is your 'link'

Nowhere does it say that the Principle taught them how to do anything- he was asked what other forms of sex were- and he told them.

 

[mdk]

Perhaps you should follow your own advice. Nowhere in your link does it mention anything about teaching teen girls how to properly insert female condoms but that didn't stop you from claiming I supported it. Sil's claims, ya know the ones I were questioning, turned out to better utter horseshit.

You'll also have to excuse me if I am not buying everything your link is selling considering Todd Starnes' history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

I don't believe the parents when they claim their daughter was taught how perform oral sex by the Principle. It sounds exactly like the unsubstantiated and unverifiable bullshit that he is known to peddle. You'll have excuse me if I don't mindlessly believe his bullshit.

 

[koshergrl]

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio.

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

I don't believe the parents when they claim their daughter was taught how perform oral sex by the Principle. It sounds exactly like the unsubstantiated and unverifiable bullshit that he is known to peddle. You'll have excuse me if I don't mindlessly believe his bullshit.

Parents in Onalaska, Wash., for instance, expressed outrage June 12 during a Fox News broadcast. They said their children were quiet, withdrawn and embarrassed to talk about what had happened in school the day before. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their 11-year-old daughter, they discovered that the principal had given the fifth-graders instruction on oral and anal sex.
“Our daughter didn’t want to go back to school. She cried all the way to school today,” said Curtis Pannkuk.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/parents-take-battle-with-planned-parenthood-to-next-level/#ixzz3uQq7DgvY

Graphic discussion of sex acts upsets some Onalaska parents

The superintendent said the explicit instruction on fellatio was a part of the curriculum.

Which confirms the fact that the sex ed curriculum is geared towards grooming kids for sex.

 

[Syriusly]

Written by whom? Todd Starnes. You should read more effectively before popping off, perhaps.

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

I don't believe the parents when they claim their daughter was taught how perform oral sex by the Principle. It sounds exactly like the unsubstantiated and unverifiable bullshit that he is known to peddle. You'll have excuse me if I don't mindlessly believe his bullshit.

Parents in Onalaska, Wash., for instance, expressed outrage June 12 during a Fox News broadcast. They said their children were quiet, withdrawn and embarrassed to talk about what had happened in school the day before. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their 11-year-old daughter, they discovered that the principal had given the fifth-graders instruction on oral and anal sex.
“Our daughter didn’t want to go back to school. She cried all the way to school today,” said Curtis Pannkuk.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/parents-take-battle-with-planned-parenthood-to-next-level/#ixzz3uQq7DgvY

Graphic discussion of sex acts upsets some Onalaska parents

Feel free to provide the specific quote which backs up your claim- because none of your links support your 'claim' aka lie.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio

 

[koshergrl]

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

I don't believe the parents when they claim their daughter was taught how perform oral sex by the Principle. It sounds exactly like the unsubstantiated and unverifiable bullshit that he is known to peddle. You'll have excuse me if I don't mindlessly believe his bullshit.

Parents in Onalaska, Wash., for instance, expressed outrage June 12 during a Fox News broadcast. They said their children were quiet, withdrawn and embarrassed to talk about what had happened in school the day before. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their 11-year-old daughter, they discovered that the principal had given the fifth-graders instruction on oral and anal sex.
“Our daughter didn’t want to go back to school. She cried all the way to school today,” said Curtis Pannkuk.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/parents-take-battle-with-planned-parenthood-to-next-level/#ixzz3uQq7DgvY

Graphic discussion of sex acts upsets some Onalaska parents

Feel free to provide the specific quote which backs up your claim- because none of your links support your 'claim' aka lie.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio

There are interviews with the parents at the links I provided. And an interview with the superintendent who did not deny the allegations, and instead said that it was all a part of the school's sex ed curriculum.

 

[Syriusly]

Tood Stanres has a long history of playing fast and lose with the facts. The reason you don't care is that his stories buttress your confirmation basis.

"Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument."

Your logical fallacy is ad hominem

In other words, if you have a point, make it. What, specifically, do you maintain is a lie?

You won't say, because you're full of shit.

I don't believe the parents when they claim their daughter was taught how perform oral sex by the Principle. It sounds exactly like the unsubstantiated and unverifiable bullshit that he is known to peddle. You'll have excuse me if I don't mindlessly believe his bullshit.

Parents in Onalaska, Wash., for instance, expressed outrage June 12 during a Fox News broadcast. They said their children were quiet, withdrawn and embarrassed to talk about what had happened in school the day before. When Curtis and Jean Pannkuk began questioning their 11-year-old daughter, they discovered that the principal had given the fifth-graders instruction on oral and anal sex.
“Our daughter didn’t want to go back to school. She cried all the way to school today,” said Curtis Pannkuk.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/parents-take-battle-with-planned-parenthood-to-next-level/#ixzz3uQq7DgvY

Graphic discussion of sex acts upsets some Onalaska parents

Feel free to provide the specific quote which backs up your claim- because none of your links support your 'claim' aka lie.

No, my link is about the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio

There are interviews with the parents at the links I provided. And an interview with the superintendent who did not deny the allegations, and instead said that it was all a part of the school's sex ed curriculum.

Then provide that link- and the quote from it- that supports your claim

Because I have looked at your links- and not one of them shows

"the principal who gave explicit instructions to 10-11 year old children how to perform fellatio"

as you 'claimed'- aka lied.