bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,169
- 47,316
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #221
I think Pam Geller should a hold Caroline and Catherine Cartoon Contest.
I think you should pull your head out of your ass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Pam Geller should a hold Caroline and Catherine Cartoon Contest.
Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
You are rationaliziing- saying on one hand "Oh its bad when Cruz's children are attacked' and out the other side of your mouth you imply it is Cruz's own fault for showing us his children. It is rationalization and equivocation.
Every politician has shown himself with his kids- perhaps you think that is wrong- but it is not attacking the children- it isn't harming children.
Going into a national forum and attack Cruz's kids, or Obama's kids, or Chelsea's kids or Palin's kids- and harming them- in order to attack their parents if a fucking asshole move- and should be condemned universally- and clearly- with no 'equivalency'
Simple line in the sand- attacking kids on the internet is done by hateful immoral fucking bastards.
I think everyone should be able to clearly- and without any equivocation- condemn the internet abuse of kids.
But why call him God?Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
You are rationaliziing- saying on one hand "Oh its bad when Cruz's children are attacked' and out the other side of your mouth you imply it is Cruz's own fault for showing us his children. It is rationalization and equivocation.
Every politician has shown himself with his kids- perhaps you think that is wrong- but it is not attacking the children- it isn't harming children.
Going into a national forum and attack Cruz's kids, or Obama's kids, or Chelsea's kids or Palin's kids- and harming them- in order to attack their parents if a fucking asshole move- and should be condemned universally- and clearly- with no 'equivalency'
Simple line in the sand- attacking kids on the internet is done by hateful immoral fucking bastards.
I think everyone should be able to clearly- and without any equivocation- condemn the internet abuse of kids.
God, for once you posted something I agree with!
That is a pathetic justification and pure bull shit. Politicians have been using children, theirs and others as props forever, the main stream media have traditionally not attacked the children. Anyone who thinks differently has some real personal issues and needs professional help, like you.Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
Exactly and they need to be in a position where the only job they can get is cleaning septic tanks with their tongue.That is a pathetic justification and pure bull shit. Politicians have been using children, theirs and others as props forever, the main stream media have traditionally not attacked the children. Anyone who thinks differently has some real personal issues and needs professional help, like you.Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
I just want to point out that there is another thread regarding the same subject.
BUT in that thread- a Conservative proclaims that means it is now okay for Conservatives to attack Obama's kids.
That is how some people react to an immoral reaction- thinking it provides an excuse for them to be immoral also.
I think Pam Geller should a hold Caroline and Catherine Cartoon Contest.
I think you should pull your head out of your ass.
The cartoon depicts Cruz as an organ grinder and organ grinders have monkeys. How does Cruz construe that as those monkeys being his kids?
I would like to thank the LIBERALS who had the nerve to say that this was wrong. Many of us said it was wrong when the Obama children were thrown into the fray also. Same with Chelsea Clinton.
People who push this garbage ARE the problem with the country; win at all costs, tear down the kids, burn the church, whatever it takes. Forget Ted Cruz, look at those little girls in the picture. It is bad enough they will soon know you hate their daddy, but that is understandable. But for them to think you hate them also?!?!?!?!
Hey folks, those damn Isis assholes got nothin on you!
That is a pathetic justification and pure bull shit. Politicians have been using children, theirs and others as props forever, the main stream media have traditionally not attacked the children. Anyone who thinks differently has some real personal issues and needs professional help, like you.Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
I just want to point out that there is another thread regarding the same subject.
BUT in that thread- a Conservative proclaims that means it is now okay for Conservatives to attack Obama's kids.
That is how some people react to an immoral reaction- thinking it provides an excuse for them to be immoral also.
He shouldn't use his kids on the campaign, but the cartoon was at best tasteless.The guy is backwards like the taliban. there's little question of it!
This coming from the Washington POS and the like that shit themselves over a GOP congressional aid calling out the Obama daughter dress code during the 2014 pardon of the turkeys.
He shouldn't use his kids on the campaign, but the cartoon was at best tasteless.The guy is backwards like the taliban. there's little question of it!
This coming from the Washington POS and the like that shit themselves over a GOP congressional aid calling out the Obama daughter dress code during the 2014 pardon of the turkeys.
I recall seeing her, and the W twins, at various rallies, but not actually being in commercials ... at least not until they were adults.He shouldn't use his kids on the campaign, but the cartoon was at best tasteless.The guy is backwards like the taliban. there's little question of it!
This coming from the Washington POS and the like that shit themselves over a GOP congressional aid calling out the Obama daughter dress code during the 2014 pardon of the turkeys.
people have used their kids forever. the Clintons hauled their kid around with them and still USES her today. so that is bs
That is a pathetic justification and pure bull shit. Politicians have been using children, theirs and others as props forever, the main stream media have traditionally not attacked the children. Anyone who thinks differently has some real personal issues and needs professional help, like you.Politicians have been bringing their families into campaigns since at least the 1960's- and there is nothing wrong with a politician being shown with his children- no more than putting your kids on your Christmas cards.
That's a straw man argument and has nothing to do with what I said. Cruz has actively wielded his children as campaign circus monkeys and posted it on youtube. It's disgraceful and disgusting, and that is my point. Cruz himself is the one who set the standard on this. I disapprove of both sides.
I just want to point out that there is another thread regarding the same subject.
BUT in that thread- a Conservative proclaims that means it is now okay for Conservatives to attack Obama's kids.
That is how some people react to an immoral reaction- thinking it provides an excuse for them to be immoral also.
Remember how some conservatives nyucked nyucked when their GOP presidential candidate said this:
“Do you know why Chelsea is so ugly?
She’s the love child of Hillary Clinton and Janet Reno!”
Fucking asshole.
You are rationaliziing- saying on one hand "Oh its bad when Cruz's children are attacked' and out the other side of your mouth you imply it is Cruz's own fault for showing us his children.
I think everyone should be able to clearly- and without any equivocation- condemn the internet abuse of kids.