Couchpotato
Platinum Member
- Mar 2, 2021
- 12,883
- 6,149
- 938
Who says other family member's opinions supercede the partner's? Oh that pesky Government again.....Nope. The gov gives that right to supersede other family members.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says other family member's opinions supercede the partner's? Oh that pesky Government again.....Nope. The gov gives that right to supersede other family members.
No they don’t. If the Government didn’t exost what rights would you not have that you have now?
If the Government is the grantor of rights why is it under any obligation to grant them equitably unless it serves the purposes of the Government?Yes they do confer rights and make sure they are applied equitably
If the Government is the grantor of rights why is it under any obligation to grant them equitably unless it serves the purposes of the Government?
I have all the rights in the world without the Government. What rights dont I have if the Government doesnt exist? Can you name a single one?Government does exist.
Without Government, who would enforce your rights as a citizen?
But you said the Government is the holder of the power to confer or not confer rights. Correct? That they are the source of our rights. If that's true (which I do not believe) why would the Government grant anyone any rights that arent to the Government's advantage?Because they are a Government of We the People
Rights that are not codified are subject to interpretation. In my example, society will generally side with immediate blood family over spouse/partner. Overriding this, giving the spouse the right to make those decisions is codified in law.Can you answer the question? Why would you not have those rights if the Government doesnt exist?
Why would you want the Government to be the source of your rights anyway? If they are the grantor of your rights they have every right to deny you any right they see fit. If there is some man made entity or institution that's granting you your "rights" you have no rights just privileges that they can grant or take away for whatever reason they can come up with. If your rights are innate and Government's role is to but protect those rights YOU have actual real rights.
You keep using the Government to stop me from having my rights....Rights that are not codified are subject to interpretation. In my example, society will generally side with immediate blood family over spouse/partner. Overriding this, giving the spouse the right to make those decisions is codified in law.
I can enter into any agreement I want with whomever I want unless there's some entity that stops me for doing so. What could that entity be called.....Rights that are not codified are subject to interpretation. In my example, society will generally side with immediate blood family over spouse/partner. Overriding this, giving the spouse the right to make those decisions is codified in law.
All forgiving if you're sorry. I don't know why that is such a difficult concept.n 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 Paul lists some sinful lifestyles that give evidence that a person is not saved: “Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men . . . will inherit the kingdom of God.” In other words, a practicing, unrepentant idolater, adulterer, or homosexual is fooling himself if he thinks he is going to heaven. Christians are saved from such sins.
-----------------------------
Here I thought God was all forgiving.
So you're saying someone who doesn't believe in lying or cheating probably lies or cheats. Makes perfect sense.He actually believe this stuff.
Marriage: As Solicitor General, Ted Cruz led the charge to deny Texas couples marriage equality. In the Senate, he has supported a constitutional amendment that would prevent the federal government from recognizing marriage equality and an amendment placing members of the Supreme Court up for election. He even said that Justice Anthony Kennedy should resign and that the Obergefell ruling threw the Supreme Court’s “very legitimacy into question.” He has said a ruling in favor of marriage equality was “fundamentally illegitimate.” Cruz has promised to campaign “front and center” on his opposition to marriage equality.
2024 Republican Candidates
This November anti-equality candidates from coast to coast, up and down the ballot, will ask voters to elect them to jobs with immense control over their rights and freedoms. That's why HRC is sharing what these candidates’ actual resumes look like - because voters deserve to understand what’s...www.hrc.org
Oh he is so religious he probably cheats on his wife and incest his children, we don't know whatever he does.
I don't care if queers get married if that's what they want to do. Just shut up about their sickness and stop grooming kids.
-------------------------------------Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage
"Obergefell, like Roe v. Wade, ignored two centuries of our nation's history," the Republican senator said.www.newsweek.com
I just knew it would come up soon.
Guys, let me help with this. Whenever a man puts his thing somewhere it doesn't belong, bad things happen. Monkeypox, AIDS, STDs, devastating psychological damage, harm to society, etc. It's just the way it is. Complaining about it is as silly as whining when you get shocked after sticking your finger in an electrical socket.Why is it all these right wingers are constantly thinking about gay sex? It's weird.
Guys, let me help with this. Whenever a man puts his thing somewhere it doesn't belong, bad things happen. Monkeypox, AIDS, STDs, devastating psychological damage, harm to society, etc. It's just the way it is. Complaining about it is as silly as whining when you get shocked after sticking your finger in an electrical socket.
Good. That's better than the whole country being forced to follow immoral leftwing atheist laws.Well, they're going full federalist. Leave everything possible to the states.
Okay. I understand the reasoning, but we're going to see big, big differences going from state to state. The country will no longer be purple, it will be dark red OR dark blue.
E Pluribus Unum is dead. I think that's what they want. It beats trying to secede.
And damn sure, next thing you know, they'll be forcing you to live in the state you hate the most!Well, they're going full federalist. Leave everything possible to the states.
Okay. I understand the reasoning, but we're going to see big, big differences going from state to state. The country will no longer be purple, it will be dark red OR dark blue.
E Pluribus Unum is dead. I think that's what they want. It beats trying to secede.
What Cruz said is that marriage (gay or straight) is not a federal issue that should be decided by the SC of the US. That is all he said. Let the voters of each state decide, and for the record that is all the SC opinion on abortion said----------not a federal constitutional issue, but a state by state issue to be decided by the voters of each state.
the misquotes and down right lies about this are destroying any chance for a sane discussion of it.
Equal treatment under the law is a federal issueWhat Cruz said is that marriage (gay or straight) is not a federal issue that should be decided by the SC of the US. That is all he said. Let the voters of each state decide, and for the record that is all the SC opinion on abortion said----------not a federal constitutional issue, but a state by state issue to be decided by the voters of each state.
the misquotes and down right lies about this are destroying any chance for a sane discussion of it.
Special treatment based on sexual behavior is not.Equal treatment under the law is a federal issue