Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

I thought he was carrying a rifle, not a handgun.

Federal law does not apply.

 

[Blues Man]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

HE'S NOT A PROHIBITED PERSON, HE CAN MOVE GUNS AND AMMO ACROSS STATE LINES

C. MEANS NOTHING UNLESS YOU'RE A PROHIBITED PERSON.

IF WISCONSIN HAD THE SAME LAWS AS ILLINOIS EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN LEGAL

YOU CAN CHECK YOUR GUN IN AT A FUCKING AIRPORT YOU DOLT

It is illegal for anyone UNDER THE AGE OF 18 to carry a gun in WI

 

[Juicin]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

HE'S NOT A PROHIBITED PERSON, HE CAN MOVE GUNS AND AMMO ACROSS STATE LINES

C. MEANS NOTHING UNLESS YOU'RE A PROHIBITED PERSON.

IF WISCONSIN HAD THE SAME LAWS AS ILLINOIS EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN LEGAL

YOU CAN CHECK YOUR GUN IN AT A FUCKING AIRPORT YOU DOLT

It is illegal for anyone UNDER THE AGE OF 18 to carry a gun in WI

Yea, that's the class A misdemeanor i keep talkign about

That's the only law he violated

Possession of a firearm by a minor

Federally and in Illinois what he was doing (before the shooting started anyway) was 100% legal

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Course it was self defense, all the evidence we needed was for PROGS to declare the victim the culprit, that's what they're trained for.

News for the commie-loving maggots. When you assault people, when you threaten police officers then YOU OWN THE BEHAVIOR AND CONSEQUENCES. Your mother is not here to tolerate your rancid attitudes. It's not societies fault that it's YOU WHO IS FUCKED. Take responsibility.

 

[Turtlesoup]

It doesn't matter.

WTF? Bwuhahahahaha......

A domestic terrorist supporter telling me that the fact that domestic terrorists made the choice to show up and destroy some person's car dealership, forcing him and others to defend that business, DOES NOT MATTER in regards to some of those domestic terrorists being shot / killed by the defenders is the dumbest and most humorous thing I have heard all week.

If the terrorists had not shown up the dealership would not have been attacked, defenders would not have been attacked, and terrorists / attackers would not have been shot.

Thank you for giving me a reason NOT to talk to you any more, snowflake.

I don't support anyone who breaks the law.

Never have never will

I do not condone violence

never have never will.

The fact is this minor was in violation of WI gun laws.

IF he was a law abiding minor he would not have been on the streets with a gun.

I do not support people who break the law.

He was not idiot..............and that wouldn't matter anyways. First off, even if had been in violation of a gun law because of his age, that doesn't mean that the mob gets to attack him. Hell it makes oy worse, since they would have had to know that he was just a kid that they were attacking.

Secondly, in WI adults have the right to open carry----kids can to as long as they have adult supervision which he had before the mob separated him from the others and tried to kill him.

And Third---the mob had no right to try harm him as soon as they did---he had the right to defend himself from the violent communists and criminals killing them.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The Jury will find him innocent of this ridiculous charge and he'll be treated like the hero that he is by most of the people Antifa BLM

I wouldn't be so sure of that.

He was carrying a gun illegally after all.

I'm glad there will be more people like him fighting back against Antifa and BLM.

So you support people breaking federal and state gun laws?

I have cad a CCW permit since I was 21 and I personally think anyone who breaks state and federal gun laws should serve jail time

He will if this is the beginning of the Right giving it back to communist domestic terrorists Antifa and BLM It wouldn't be a bad thing to see those Communist scum shot down in the streets

So you are in favor of people breaking state and federal laws?

No one is in favor of that sans Leftists like Jerry Nadler.

Then you must agree with me that this kid should be found guilty of both state and federal gun crimes and should serve time like any other criminal who does the same.

How can I agree when I don't know anything about the case yet? Are we not innocent until proven guilty in America? You must agree with me that all those rioters that were arrested should have to go to court.

 

[Blues Man]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

I thought he was carrying a rifle, not a handgun.

Federal law does not apply.

NRA-ILA | Citizen's Guide To Federal Firearms Laws - Summary

A Citizen`s Guide to Federal Firearms Laws A summary of federal restrictions on the purchase, sale, possession, and transportation of firearms and ammunition. Caution: Firearm laws are subject to frequent change and court interpretation.

www.nraila.org

Ineligible Persons

The following classes of people are ineligible to possess, receive, ship, or transport firearms or ammunition:

• Those convicted of crimes punishable by imprisonment for over one year, except state misdemeanors punishable by two years or less.
• Fugitives from justice.
• Unlawful users of certain depressant, narcotic, or stimulant drugs.
• Those adjudicated as mental defectives or incompetents or those committed to any mental institution.
• Illegal aliens.
• Citizens who have renounced their citizenship.
• Those persons dishonorably discharged from the Armed Forces.
• Persons less than 18 years of age for the purchase of a shotgun or rifle.
• Persons less than 21 years of age for the purchase of a firearm that is other than a shotgun or rifle.
• Persons subject to a court order that restrains such persons from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner.
• Persons convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

 

[Desperado]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

If the police fail to do their job you must be prepared to protect your property and yourself by any and all means possible.
Epic Failure on the part of the police

 

[Juicin]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

I thought he was carrying a rifle, not a handgun.

Federal law does not apply.

NRA-ILA | Citizen's Guide To Federal Firearms Laws - Summary

A Citizen`s Guide to Federal Firearms Laws A summary of federal restrictions on the purchase, sale, possession, and transportation of firearms and ammunition. Caution: Firearm laws are subject to frequent change and court interpretation.

www.nraila.org

Ineligible Persons

The following classes of people are ineligible to possess, receive, ship, or transport firearms or ammunition:

• Those convicted of crimes punishable by imprisonment for over one year, except state misdemeanors punishable by two years or less.
• Fugitives from justice.
• Unlawful users of certain depressant, narcotic, or stimulant drugs.
• Those adjudicated as mental defectives or incompetents or those committed to any mental institution.
• Illegal aliens.
• Citizens who have renounced their citizenship.
• Those persons dishonorably discharged from the Armed Forces.
• Persons less than 18 years of age for the purchase of a shotgun or rifle.
• Persons less than 21 years of age for the purchase of a firearm that is other than a shotgun or rifle.
• Persons subject to a court order that restrains such persons from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner.
• Persons convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

ok i'll give you that one too, he MIGHT have violated that law by transporting the weapon.

But if he was with an adult related to him or not...He'd have been 100% legal

And i'm assuming this legal jargon isn't referencing some exchange and is as it looks. Simply moving the weapon on public property is illegal for a minor

 

[Faun]

And illegally

Why was Rittenhouse running down the street with an AR-15?

He was responding to the violence on the left

and illegally carrying a firearm.

You don't respond to crime by committing crime

You don't commit MURDER in self defense.

It's not self defense when the actor is in the commission of a crime...

939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.
(1m) (a) In this subsection:

2. “Place of business" means a business that the actor owns or operates.​

(b) The presumption described in par. (ar) does not apply if any of the following applies:

1. The actor was engaged in a criminal activity...​

He had no legal authority to threaten lethal force to protect someone else's property and he was "engaged in a criminal activity" when he fired his weapon. A self defense case will fail him if the law is upheld in court.

 

[Jitss617]

Looks like it was on fire, it would be interesting to see what it was View attachment 380720

That's the light from behind it. You've already been shown it was just a plastic bag on the ground, not burned up; and you were shown it was not lit as it was thrown.

Of course, I'm pointing this out to the liar who falsely claimed the victim called the shooter the n-word.

One lie at a time.. are you saying “ it’s just a bag” can you throw a empty plastic bag that far?

and you admit he said the n world?Right?

No, there's something in the bag. It's visible, though not identifiable, since the bag is transparent. But the bag was not on fire.

And yes, he used the n-word, but not at the teen-murderer as you falsely claimed. You lied.

Was the object thrown meant for bodily harm? And how do you know who he was talking to since the camera doesn’t show who he was shouting at

"how do you know who he was talking to since the camera doesn’t show who he was shouting at"

LOLOLOL

Shouldn't you be asking yourself that since you claimed he was talking to the teen murderer?

I don’t really care, I’m more concerned about his language.. many assume he was shouting at the hero. Doent really matter the video shows a racist democrat attacking a teen. Hehe

Well I care that you bald-faced lied. That's why I asked you to post the video because I knew you were lying. I knew what he said and I knew who he said it to and I knew it wasn't the teen murderer.

You lie. That's what you do.

You can’t say it isn’t, but it’s circulating on the Internet that he was talking to the boy, these are coming from witnesses that were there.. but that’s not the issue, the issue is the democrat using the N word.. than trying to hurt the boy ..

Dumbfuck, he's in the guy's face at about the 0:18 mark for pointing his gun at him. That guy gets pulled back and out of the frame of the camera but the guy in the red shirt continues yelling at him for pointing his gun at him.

Are you a psychic?

Dumbfuck, it's on the video. He's seen getting in the guy's face for pointing a gun at him.

Are you still claiming he was yelling at the teen murderer, who's never seen in that video, for pointing his gun at the guy in the red shirt?

So your guessing? Do you have a link?

LOLOL

Slobbers the idiot who said it was on video that the guy in the red shirt called the n-word.

I'm still waiting to see where you saw that, Jizzy?

The point is he was saying the N word, and it’s circulating on the Internet he was talking to the hero.. I’m just going with what the Internet is saying. Maybe you know more? lol I doubt it haha

No, the point is you lied. You claimed he called the teen murderer the n-word. Here, I'll repost it ...

With the intention to do bodily harm he also called him the N-word twice.

... when pressed for proof, you admitted he isn't actually seen calling the teen murderer the n-word.

You lied and got caught. Deal with it, Jizzy.

Do you have evidence he didn’t? Mic drop

I don't need evidence to prove you wrong when you're incapable of proving your claims are true. When are you going to stop hitting yourself in the head with your mic?

I’m going with what the Internet is saying .. thanks

Moron, this is the Internet. So who's saying it? Schmucks like you?

Why are you hung up on who he was talking to why aren’t you upset that he’s calling somebody the N-word? How do you democrat supposed to be protective? Lol

 

[Faun]

A 17 year old is dead because we have all gone bat shit crazy, hate rules, common sense has left the building.

No he's dread becvause he made a series of bad

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Of course your sympathies are with the murderer and not the victims. That's what you 1000 post a month posters do. Side with hate and division, every single time. You even sided with Dylan Rooff when he shot up the black church.

Rittenhouse is not a victim.

He was committing state and federal gun crimes and he crossed state lines in order to do so.

He doesn't give up the right ot self defense when he's jaywalking...

Doesn't when he's got cocaine in his pocket

Not that complex

He has the right to defend himself but what he doesn't have is the right to break state and federal gun laws Not that complex.

This kid was a criminal just like any other piece of shit that breaks the law.

So he's guilty of a class a misdemeanor

Again he broke no federal laws*

Minors can have guns under federal law

It's not a controlled substance you can bring a gun across state lines

Wrong

He transported a gun across state lines

He was a minor and not allowed to carry a gun in public

Federal Firearms Laws

www.justice.gov

C. AND, the firearm or ammunition was transported across a state line atany time. (Defendant need not have transported the firearm or known of itstransportation across state lines.)

Federal Minimum Age to Purchase and Possess Handguns | USCCA

Federal laws regarding the minimum age for the purchase and possession of handguns, including temporary transfers.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

FEDERAL MINIMUM AGE TO PURCHASE AND POSSESS HANDGUNS
Minimum Age for Possession of Handguns
Subject to limited exceptions, federal law prohibits the possession (unlawful for a person to sell, deliver or otherwise transfer to a person who the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a juvenile) of a handgun or handgun ammunition by any person under the age of 18

That's for handguns, not rifles. There are no federal age limits on rifles.

Minimum Age

What's the minimum age to buy a gun? Minimum age laws for the purchase of guns are intended to decrease access to firearms by young people.

lawcenter.giffords.org

 

[Flash]

 

[Flash]

 

[Faun]

The Jury will find him innocent of this ridiculous charge and he'll be treated like the hero that he is by most of the people Antifa BLM

I wouldn't be so sure of that.

He was carrying a gun illegally after all.

I'm glad there will be more people like him fighting back against Antifa and BLM.

So you support people breaking federal and state gun laws?

I have cad a CCW permit since I was 21 and I personally think anyone who breaks state and federal gun laws should serve jail time

He will if this is the beginning of the Right giving it back to communist domestic terrorists Antifa and BLM It wouldn't be a bad thing to see those Communist scum shot down in the streets

So you are in favor of people breaking state and federal laws?

No one is in favor of that sans Leftists like Jerry Nadler.

Then you must agree with me that this kid should be found guilty of both state and federal gun crimes and should serve time like any other criminal who does the same.

How can I agree when I don't know anything about the case yet? Are we not innocent until proven guilty in America? You must agree with me that all those rioters that were arrested should have to go to court.

Innocent until proven guilty is a legal construct. This is an internet forum, not a courtroom. He's guilty as sin.

 

[martybegan]

This whole thing was so predictable from the beginning. The left has for decades been accustomed to holding violent protests, burning things, assaulting people, damaging property, etc, with little or no repercussions. In fact, they have a sympathetic media that focuses more on their cause than their actions. This level of on-going and increasing violence, however, has finally caused a counter reaction. Property owners and innocent bystanders have realized that the official power structure is not going to protect them and they are starting to fight back. I said that it wouldn't be long before these thugs went after somebody that was armed and willing to defend himself, and people would die, and now it has. This won't stop here, either, because the violent protesters have no intention of stopping their violence and will only increase it because they still believe there are a lot of soft targets that won't fight back. The counter reaction will only increase, as it becomes ever more apparent that protection is not to be found. This only stops when the protesters stop being violent.

You can argue that this kid broke the law himself, that he should not have been on the streets with a rifle, but when the police are pulled back, who is going to enforce the laws that the kid broke? The flip side of the argument, of course, is that without the violent protesters in the streets, the kid would never have been walking around carrying an AR-15. Think of how foolish it is for the protesters to, on the one hand, scream that the police need to be defunded and disbanded, while on the other, want those same police to protect them from the inevitable results of their actions.

Circular reasoning.

This kid took it upon himself to illegally arm himself and protect the property of other people.

That does not excuse rioters, looters or arsonists from their crimes.

You're missing the point, which is that the violence of the protests has been escalating and has reached the point where other citizens no longer are going to allow themselves to be helpless victims. When the power structure prevents those who are charged with keeping the peace from doing that, the citizens will do it themselves. It only gets bloodier from here until either the protests become less violent (and the protesters actively discourage the violence) or the police are allowed to break them up before they become riots. People are going to die is the ultimate point.

I'm not missing the point.

Rittenhouse was ILEGALLY carrying a firearm in public.

That is a fact and not up for debate.

Dead looters were ILLEGALLY trying to murder Rittenhouse.

FACT

So that makes carrying a firearm illegally OK?

Tell me would he have been attacked if he wasn't illegally carrying a firearm ?

Nothing better than blaming the victim, you gutless coward.

FOAD.

He is a criminal.

Do you moan over other criminals who get assaulted while committing a crime?

He is guilty of nothing more than violating gun control ordinances, that are nothing more than procedural in nature.

The rioters are guilty of universally recognized crimes, and they were assaulting him.

Your tired attempt at equivocation is just that, tired and also pathetic.

Illegally carrying a firearm is a federal crime. or didn't you know that.

A criminal is a criminal why do you want to encourage the breaking of federal and state laws?

Procedural crime again.

And a criminal is not a criminal when our society is over-legalized.

Equating being 17 and possessing an otherwise legal firearm with destroying property an assaulting people is idiotic.

You equivocating horse's ass.

Apologies to horses everywhere.

 

[Flash]

Kyle has two Commie kills and one wounded with his $500 AR with a $30 optic.

Meanwhile I have $100K in firearms with most of my ARs being $1500-$2000 in value and I don't have jackshit in fighting Communism in the US.

Kyle is Da Man!

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

It was not his property.

He was acting illegally as armed security.

At the point of the attack he was defending himself.

What the hell is even illegal armed security?

Can you point out that law?

I already linked to WI gun laws.

Anyone under 18 cannot legally carry a firearm in public.

If a person under 18 is acting as protection of a public business while carrying a firearm in WI he is doing so illegally.

If the owner of the business hired a 17 tear old to carry a gun on his property he would be breaking the law by illegally hiring a minor to act as armed security. If the minor proclaimed that it was his job to protect a business that someone else owned while carrying a firearm he was acting as illegal armed security.

This is not high level reasoning

Procedural bullshit.


Keep defending rioters you SJW pansy.

I have no interest in social justice.

I will never support people who loot, riot, or commit arson.

Just like I will never support anyone who illegally carries a firearm.

You are a fucking hypocrite.

You are an equivocator. When the law stops enforcing the law, law abiding people can stand up to take its place.

Anything else is tyranny and anarchy.

But this kid was not law abiding was he?

No he wasn't because he was illegally carrying a firearm.

So if NYC descends into chaos I can't defend myself with a long arm or a handgun because outside carry in NYC is illegal?

When the police refuse to enforce the law, procedural laws become moot.

Why do you need to take to the streets to defend yourself?

You have no authority to cross state lines and illegally carry a firearm in the name of "self defense".

This kid had absolutely no reason to be illegally carrying a firearm in a state where he was not a resident

All procedural bullshit. When the government decides it doesn't want to keep order, this is what it fucking gets.

I hope the kid gets off, and you die a little bit inside because of it you rioting loving wanna be rioter poseur.

 

[martybegan]

This whole thing was so predictable from the beginning. The left has for decades been accustomed to holding violent protests, burning things, assaulting people, damaging property, etc, with little or no repercussions. In fact, they have a sympathetic media that focuses more on their cause than their actions. This level of on-going and increasing violence, however, has finally caused a counter reaction. Property owners and innocent bystanders have realized that the official power structure is not going to protect them and they are starting to fight back. I said that it wouldn't be long before these thugs went after somebody that was armed and willing to defend himself, and people would die, and now it has. This won't stop here, either, because the violent protesters have no intention of stopping their violence and will only increase it because they still believe there are a lot of soft targets that won't fight back. The counter reaction will only increase, as it becomes ever more apparent that protection is not to be found. This only stops when the protesters stop being violent.

You can argue that this kid broke the law himself, that he should not have been on the streets with a rifle, but when the police are pulled back, who is going to enforce the laws that the kid broke? The flip side of the argument, of course, is that without the violent protesters in the streets, the kid would never have been walking around carrying an AR-15. Think of how foolish it is for the protesters to, on the one hand, scream that the police need to be defunded and disbanded, while on the other, want those same police to protect them from the inevitable results of their actions.

Circular reasoning.

This kid took it upon himself to illegally arm himself and protect the property of other people.

That does not excuse rioters, looters or arsonists from their crimes.

You're missing the point, which is that the violence of the protests has been escalating and has reached the point where other citizens no longer are going to allow themselves to be helpless victims. When the power structure prevents those who are charged with keeping the peace from doing that, the citizens will do it themselves. It only gets bloodier from here until either the protests become less violent (and the protesters actively discourage the violence) or the police are allowed to break them up before they become riots. People are going to die is the ultimate point.

I'm not missing the point.

Rittenhouse was ILEGALLY carrying a firearm in public.

That is a fact and not up for debate.

Dead looters were ILLEGALLY trying to murder Rittenhouse.

FACT

So that makes carrying a firearm illegally OK?

Tell me would he have been attacked if he wasn't illegally carrying a firearm ?

Nothing better than blaming the victim, you gutless coward.

FOAD.

He is a criminal.

Do you moan over other criminals who get assaulted while committing a crime?

He is guilty of nothing more than violating gun control ordinances, that are nothing more than procedural in nature.

The rioters are guilty of universally recognized crimes, and they were assaulting him.

Your tired attempt at equivocation is just that, tired and also pathetic.

Illegally carrying a firearm is a federal crime. or didn't you know that.

A criminal is a criminal why do you want to encourage the breaking of federal and state laws?

There will be more of this and there will be more death until the riots stop being so violent and the police are allowed to break them up. I said early on that they would eventually assault someone who could and would fight back, and no number of gun control laws will stop it. That's the brutal truth.

so it doesn't matter to you that this kid was breaking state and federal laws?

Procedural bullshit.

You seem far more fixated on someone breaking dumb gun control laws as opposed to people rioting and destroying lives.

Of course you do, because you a gun grabbing, pussy footing, SJW loving simpleton.

 

[Jitss617]

Where the F are the leaders standing up
For this kid!? Where are he law makers!? This is what happens when you give in to the mob .