Camp, what Dannyboys is advocating is the most likely scenario. The chance of 4 motors to go down at the same time is highly unlikely or the two boats to run out of fuel in a place within the water boundaries of Iran. That doesn't make Obama the bad guy, it was within the authorization from the military commanders. And it seems that there was at least one apology. That's small potatoes when you are getting 10 personnel back. Were we spying or "probing"? Most likely. Perhaps we can catch them in our waters, too!Once again, your lack of credibility requires you to post a link supporting your claim that Kerry gave an apology.yes.but iran navy have routine procedure and rule like usa navyA ten man crew on what is the updated version of a PT boat is highly unlikely to be a spy ship if you were going to be spying you would use a submarine like we did with Russia for years a mechanical problem could have been determined where the ship was intercepted. This was Iran making a statement for the region no one messes with us not even the United States.maybe they were spy.maybe it was just mechanical problem
iran navy must investigate ......
What Iran did was commit an act of war and violate the Geneva Convention.If I'm holding you hostage I bet I can get you to say anything I tell you to.Now, if you could just show a link to your claim everyone could think of you as credible. Until then you have to be considered not credible. So, which is it? Do you have a link about this so-called apology?They released...under the condition the The United States apologize.
That isn't diplomacy. That's chicken shit appeasement by a weak administration.
The Iranians demanded an apology. The hostages were released. Do the math.
BTW, one of The hostages did, in fact, apologize.
Kerry the traitor piece of shit says he apologised. Biden said there was never an apology from Kerry.
Who would you believe?