Texans and their gun fetish!

[9thIDdoc]

What has "BINGO" got to do with guns or the 2nd Amendment? The OP needs a little less hysteria if there is some point he wishes to try to make.

 

[Conservative65]

When a gun can't grow leg, arms, and shoot itself, it's called fact. Like I said, that you refuse to accept facts makes my claim valid.

it's absolutely meaning less and just as stupid as you attempt at false equivalency.
it's a given that guns like most everything else we use has to be controlled by people .
it's a throw away phrase .

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

People murder people with guns, because people are inherently lazy and the NRA and gun manufacturers are more than happy to keep them from having to figure out a more imaginative and inventive way of hurting somebody else or killing them

So you admit you lied when you said murders are by guns.

You simply hate guns and want people to either not own them or own only what you think they should own.

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

 

[daws101]

oldest excuse there is.

When a gun can't grow leg, arms, and shoot itself, it's called fact. Like I said, that you refuse to accept facts makes my claim valid.

it's absolutely meaning less and just as stupid as you attempt at false equivalency.
it's a given that guns like most everything else we use has to be controlled by people .
it's a throw away phrase .

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

no need it's a meaningless statement you attempting to make it more than that is fucking ridicules.

What I did was show someone that hates guns trying to make it out as if it's the gun's fault instead of the PERSON misusing the gun.

"fucking ridicules" Is that ebonics?

a typo is the best you have?
murder by guns is not a false statement fact is many murders are committed using fire arms
it's a factual statement on what type of "weapon" was used.
you are attempting to make a moral issue where none exists

 

[westwall]

This just illustrates all too well how crazy this country has gotten with their guns and their Second Amendment rights and the abuse of that right.

Police raid bingo hall in Houston and find 100 guns stashed away

How is this an abuse of that Right? They weren't robbing anybody from what I can see. The report is pretty minimal.

if they were running a casino they were robbing people ,whit their permission of course.

That ain't armed robbery. Though I agree it is legalized robbery.

thanks for having a sense of humor.

Always!

 

[ChrisL]

And our government arms foreigners in foreign countries with no background checks at all!

 

[Conservative65]

When a gun can't grow leg, arms, and shoot itself, it's called fact. Like I said, that you refuse to accept facts makes my claim valid.

it's absolutely meaning less and just as stupid as you attempt at false equivalency.
it's a given that guns like most everything else we use has to be controlled by people .
it's a throw away phrase .

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

no need it's a meaningless statement you attempting to make it more than that is fucking ridicules.

What I did was show someone that hates guns trying to make it out as if it's the gun's fault instead of the PERSON misusing the gun.

"fucking ridicules" Is that ebonics?

a typo is the best you have?
murder by guns is not a false statement fact is many murders are committed using fire arms
it's a factual statement on what type of "weapon" was used.
you are attempting to make a moral issue where none exists

Unless the gun shoots itself, it's a false statement.

When a murder is committed and there is a trial, is the gun on trial or the person?

To say murder by gun is a false statement. That assumes if the PERSON committing the murder didn't have a gun, they wouldn't commit the murder and that simply isn't true.

 

[daws101]

This just illustrates all too well how crazy this country has gotten with their guns and their Second Amendment rights and the abuse of that right.

Police raid bingo hall in Houston and find 100 guns stashed away

How is this an abuse of that Right? They weren't robbing anybody from what I can see. The report is pretty minimal.

if they were running a casino they were robbing people ,whit their permission of course.

You can't rob someone if they give their permission. To rob someone involves an unlawful act usually by force. If someone consents, they aren't being robbed.

Go ahead and say "False" but you'll be arguing with the definition of rob.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

 

[Conservative65]

How is this an abuse of that Right? They weren't robbing anybody from what I can see. The report is pretty minimal.

if they were running a casino they were robbing people ,whit their permission of course.

You can't rob someone if they give their permission. To rob someone involves an unlawful act usually by force. If someone consents, they aren't being robbed.

Go ahead and say "False" but you'll be arguing with the definition of rob.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

 

[daws101]

it's absolutely meaning less and just as stupid as you attempt at false equivalency.
it's a given that guns like most everything else we use has to be controlled by people .
it's a throw away phrase .

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

People murder people with guns, because people are inherently lazy and the NRA and gun manufacturers are more than happy to keep them from having to figure out a more imaginative and inventive way of hurting somebody else or killing them

So you admit you lied when you said murders are by guns.

You simply hate guns and want people to either not own them or own only what you think they should own.

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

false a load gun is in and of itself is dangerous. end of story.
own it,

 

[ChrisL]

Of course a discussion is going to be soiled by the usual trolls.

 

[Conservative65]

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

People murder people with guns, because people are inherently lazy and the NRA and gun manufacturers are more than happy to keep them from having to figure out a more imaginative and inventive way of hurting somebody else or killing them

So you admit you lied when you said murders are by guns.

You simply hate guns and want people to either not own them or own only what you think they should own.

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

false a load gun is in and of itself is dangerous. end of story.
own it,

Not unless a PERSON picks it up.

You're either a stupid motherfucker or a troll, which makes you a stupid motherfucker. Either way, figure out what you are. Here's a hint. You're the same either way.

 

[daws101]

it's absolutely meaning less and just as stupid as you attempt at false equivalency.
it's a given that guns like most everything else we use has to be controlled by people .
it's a throw away phrase .

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

no need it's a meaningless statement you attempting to make it more than that is fucking ridicules.

What I did was show someone that hates guns trying to make it out as if it's the gun's fault instead of the PERSON misusing the gun.

"fucking ridicules" Is that ebonics?

a typo is the best you have?
murder by guns is not a false statement fact is many murders are committed using fire arms
it's a factual statement on what type of "weapon" was used.
you are attempting to make a moral issue where none exists

Unless the gun shoots itself, it's a false statement.

When a murder is committed and there is a trial, is the gun on trial or the person?

To say murder by gun is a false statement. That assumes if the PERSON committing the murder didn't have a gun, they wouldn't commit the murder and that simply isn't true.

false a gun shoots, in this context who shoots it is meaningless.
again you are attempting to moralize.

 

[daws101]

if they were running a casino they were robbing people ,whit their permission of course.

You can't rob someone if they give their permission. To rob someone involves an unlawful act usually by force. If someone consents, they aren't being robbed.

Go ahead and say "False" but you'll be arguing with the definition of rob.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

false the definition of most every thing can and is interpreted in many different way
fail.

 

[Conservative65]

It's an accurate statement unless you can show a video of one growing arms/legs and firing itself. For someone to say, "murders are by guns" is a false statement and one I addressed as false.

no need it's a meaningless statement you attempting to make it more than that is fucking ridicules.

What I did was show someone that hates guns trying to make it out as if it's the gun's fault instead of the PERSON misusing the gun.

"fucking ridicules" Is that ebonics?

a typo is the best you have?
murder by guns is not a false statement fact is many murders are committed using fire arms
it's a factual statement on what type of "weapon" was used.
you are attempting to make a moral issue where none exists

Unless the gun shoots itself, it's a false statement.

When a murder is committed and there is a trial, is the gun on trial or the person?

To say murder by gun is a false statement. That assumes if the PERSON committing the murder didn't have a gun, they wouldn't commit the murder and that simply isn't true.

false a gun shoots, in this context who shoots it is meaningless.
again you are attempting to moralize.

False. A person shoots the gun.

 

[Conservative65]

You can't rob someone if they give their permission. To rob someone involves an unlawful act usually by force. If someone consents, they aren't being robbed.

Go ahead and say "False" but you'll be arguing with the definition of rob.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

false the definition of most every thing can and is interpreted in many different way
fail.

You can't rob someone if they give their permission. To rob someone involves an unlawful act usually by force. If someone consents, they aren't being robbed.

Go ahead and say "False" but you'll be arguing with the definition of rob.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

false the definition of most every thing can and is interpreted in many different way
fail.

Not according to the definition of "define" which is to explain something clearly and completely. If it's clear and complete, there is no interpretation.

 

[daws101]

People murder people with guns, because people are inherently lazy and the NRA and gun manufacturers are more than happy to keep them from having to figure out a more imaginative and inventive way of hurting somebody else or killing them

So you admit you lied when you said murders are by guns.

You simply hate guns and want people to either not own them or own only what you think they should own.

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

false a load gun is in and of itself is dangerous. end of story.
own it,

Not unless a PERSON picks it up.

You're either a stupid motherfucker or a troll, which makes you a stupid motherfucker. Either way, figure out what you are. Here's a hint. You're the same either way.

false. On both assumptions
a gun.

Do Guns Accidentally Go Off? - USA Carry

Owners of some Remington shotguns, rifles claim pattern of inadvertent discharges

Unintentional discharge is the event of a firearm discharging (firing) at a time not intended by the user. An unintended discharge may be produced by an incompatibility between firearm design and usage, such as the phenomenon of cooking off a round in a closed bolt machine gun, a mechanical malfunction as in the case of slamfire in an automatic weapon, user induced due to training issues or negligence, or a simple accident.

 

[daws101]

no need it's a meaningless statement you attempting to make it more than that is fucking ridicules.

What I did was show someone that hates guns trying to make it out as if it's the gun's fault instead of the PERSON misusing the gun.

"fucking ridicules" Is that ebonics?

a typo is the best you have?
murder by guns is not a false statement fact is many murders are committed using fire arms
it's a factual statement on what type of "weapon" was used.
you are attempting to make a moral issue where none exists

Unless the gun shoots itself, it's a false statement.

When a murder is committed and there is a trial, is the gun on trial or the person?

To say murder by gun is a false statement. That assumes if the PERSON committing the murder didn't have a gun, they wouldn't commit the murder and that simply isn't true.

false a gun shoots, in this context who shoots it is meaningless.
again you are attempting to moralize.

False. A person shoots the gun.

false moralizing

 

[daws101]

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

false the definition of most every thing can and is interpreted in many different way
fail.

you must have been born whit out a sense of humor.
gambling is robbery by implied consent.

Oh, proven wrong and you were just joking? Liar.

If you place a bet or put your money on some gambling device, it's not implied. Do I need to show you that definition, too?

]you must have been born without a sense of humor.
you proved nothing wrong except that you have no sense of humor .
casinos are in the business of robbery whether you accept it or not.

Until the definition of "rob" changes, you're wrong whether you accept it or not.

false the definition of most every thing can and is interpreted in many different way
fail.

Not according to the definition of "define" which is to explain something clearly and completely. If it's clear and complete, there is no interpretation.

define is also an interpretation.
damn you're a dumbshit.

 

[Conservative65]

So you admit you lied when you said murders are by guns.

You simply hate guns and want people to either not own them or own only what you think they should own.

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

false a load gun is in and of itself is dangerous. end of story.
own it,

Not unless a PERSON picks it up.

You're either a stupid motherfucker or a troll, which makes you a stupid motherfucker. Either way, figure out what you are. Here's a hint. You're the same either way.

false. On both assumptions
a gun.

Do Guns Accidentally Go Off? - USA Carry

Owners of some Remington shotguns, rifles claim pattern of inadvertent discharges

Unintentional discharge is the event of a firearm discharging (firing) at a time not intended by the user. An unintended discharge may be produced by an incompatibility between firearm design and usage, such as the phenomenon of cooking off a round in a closed bolt machine gun, a mechanical malfunction as in the case of slamfire in an automatic weapon, user induced due to training issues or negligence, or a simple accident.

None of those happen unless a person picks up the gun. It doesn't fire itself.

 

[daws101]

false! again you are shifting to create the illusion that guns are harmless gun are made for one purpose, killing.
the only difference is the rationalization for killing .

Guns are made for killing. However, unless you're willing to say a gun can grow legs/arms and shoot itself, the gun, itself, is harmless. It's the person misusing it that is harmful.

false a load gun is in and of itself is dangerous. end of story.
own it,

Not unless a PERSON picks it up.

You're either a stupid motherfucker or a troll, which makes you a stupid motherfucker. Either way, figure out what you are. Here's a hint. You're the same either way.

false. On both assumptions
a gun.

Do Guns Accidentally Go Off? - USA Carry

Owners of some Remington shotguns, rifles claim pattern of inadvertent discharges

Unintentional discharge is the event of a firearm discharging (firing) at a time not intended by the user. An unintended discharge may be produced by an incompatibility between firearm design and usage, such as the phenomenon of cooking off a round in a closed bolt machine gun, a mechanical malfunction as in the case of slamfire in an automatic weapon, user induced due to training issues or negligence, or a simple accident.

None of those happen unless a person picks up the gun. It doesn't fire itself.

false.