Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And is so "invisible" it can't be seen or proved as if it never happened!!!!!Texas claims that the violations of election law in these states created an environment where ballot fraud was enabled and likely to occur.
I think its 18 or 19 states suing the denocrat cheatersAn AG that is under investigation in Texass for abuse of office and taking kickbacks is suing several states claiming they are violating law...Irony at its best.
True. I'm thinking of Brown v Board of Education.If memory serves...Plessey v Fergusen was a SCOTUS decision upholding segregationTrump isn't the one who believes the SC hould nevr intervien in state policies or decisions. Unlike you, he supports Plessy v. Fergusen.
Oh...
Really? Post the caseThe Constitution says it needs to be passed by the legislature, moron. You're arguing with the Constitution.No, it doesn't say it needs to be passed by the legislature, ya fucking moron. It says...
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
Which means a state legislature can choose to let the "manner" of holding an election up to the voters. As the Constitution reads, it's up to the states' legislature.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials.
A return to law and order, you mean.That's what you folks are hoping for
Here we go again. And will my posting the case citation cause you to stop posting bullshit?Really? Post the caseThe Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials.
It's not even a media outlet! It's setup and format, lets anyone that buys a site from them, create their own fake media outlet.... all are trolls....Russian, Chinese, Americans, Nigerians, you name it....rift raft.That is yer jist from a media outlet have you researched to find that Pennsylvania did use the process of legislature to okay the changes to the election?
It was rulings on the lawsuits against the State or Secretary of State, brought by the legislature and friendly groups for the legislature, claiming the moves were not legal...is my understanding.For the mail in ballots because of the pandemic which is the same the majority of other states did.That is yer jist from a media outlet have you researched to find that Pennsylvania did use the process of legislature to okay the changes to the election?
What process of the legislature was used to change election laws in Pa.
I thought it was the state Supreme Court, not the legislatures, that rule on the mail-in ballot stuff?
A return to law and order, you mean.That's what you folks are hoping for
Texas is welcome to go first, for the metadata and those metrics for the Union as a fixable to fixed Standard.Maybe, if they set the example by reviewing how they did their vote counting.Texas has no standing
Yes they do.
~~~~~~
Moreover, perhaps before they begin changing voting rules without legislation they should refer to their state's Constitution and the U.S. Constitution.
You mean I'm not allowed to dispute it if it doesn't say what you claim?Here we go again. And will my posting the case citation cause you to stop posting bullshit?Really? Post the caseThe Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials.
If all you'll do is shake it off like the last dozen citations i've given you, what's the point?
| Dec 11 2020 | Reply of State of Texas submitted. |
| Main Document |
One party rule IS the goal...for the democrats. That's why they are already planning to pack the courts, end filibusters, add more states to gain more senators and seats in Congress, etc.But first you must ignore the established law and order of the State and Federal Courts who rule by precedent. Also you must ignore the established State and Federal election laws to disallow the certified votes and substitute and alternate slate of electors that favor the Loser of the popular vote in all 4 states as well as the entire nation.
The goal is one party rule.
Here we go again. And will my posting the case citation cause you to stop posting bullshit?
If all you'll do is shake it off like the last dozen citations i've given you, what's the point?
Here we go again. That's the same thing you did with the previous citation I posted that showed you were completely wrong.You mean I'm not allowed to dispute it if it doesn't say what you claim?
Go fuck yourself. Your claim will stand as unsupported.
When did you cite your source on the Supreme Court saying "a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials?"Fingerboi's a fucking moron. If he says something, you know it's wrong if for no other reason than because he says it.
There are two kinds of posters. Those who spew what they claim as facts, and those who cite their source.
Most claims made by bripat are the former. Which makes him such a laughing stock.
The state of Texas has made a response, from SCOTUS website:
Dec 11 2020 Reply of State of Texas submitted. Main Document
LINK
Asymptomatic is not the same thing as immune, moron.
Of course immunity is asymptomatic.
Yes. They are both true. I find it hilarious to discover that you are so stupid that you believe that's a contradiction.Asymptomatic is not the same thing as immune, moron.
Of course immunity is asymptomatic.
Do you remember this one?
When did you cite your source on the Supreme Court saying "a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials?"
