Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the NAP is out the window?We need to execute all fucking commie motherfuckers immediately.Hang Trump and his seditious followers from the highest treeThis is NOT over by a long shot.
It's not over til' is over!
Bless Trump! Bless all Patriots!
Complete and total disconnect with reality. Have fun with that..We know who's guilty of sedition and treason, and it ain't Trump or his followers. Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knows the deal now.Hang Trump and his seditious followers from the highest treeThis is NOT over by a long shot.
It's not over til' is over!
Bless Trump! Bless all Patriots!
And Rubio are working behind the scene. Trying to sabotage all of his chances to regain his position back. The Dems already has control of both House and Senate due to them smuggling in a few RINOs among the lambs. But they are trying to make sure that Pres. Trump doesn't overturn the election which it will cause other Republican candidates who lost the Primary and Genera; elections to demand for a revote.In a Capitalist economy Greed is not only not a sin, but a cardinal Virtue!
So you think Ted Cruz had something to do with the SCOTUS tossing the case/ Well..after all Trumop said Cruz's Dad killed Kennedy or something, right?
Eight years ago. I've said this shit eight years ago. Fuck off with that.You have faith in it only if it's in your favor.
www.usmessageboard.com
We absolutely disagree on this.I voted for anyone other than Rump in 2020 and it still worked. It ain't perfect but it's the best in the World and the rest of the world knows it.
This is NOT over by a long shot.
It's not over til' is over!
Bless Trump! Bless all Patriots!
Chairman Allen West's Response to SCOTUS Decision - Republican Party of Texas
RPT Chairman Allen West's statement regarding the SCOTUS decision to dismiss Texas's constitutionally legitimate and critical lawsuit.www.texasgop.org
YES YES YES! I am ready to pack and move because I know damn well my spineless coward of a governor would sit on his ass and do nothing!
Don't forget......
The Supreme Court gave us Socialized Medicine via the ACA....yet it was unConstitutional
The Supreme court has consistently sided with the gun control lobby in recent years nearly every time.
The Supreme Court has upheld illegal searches and seizures
The Supreme Court has increased Police Powers by issuing vague and incomplete interpretations of case law.
No matter who we think we have on the SCOTUS, it cannot be trusted to uphold the US Constitution. It will obey the Establishment.
I also said......
"If American Patriots fail to do their duty and protect the Constitution, they will lose it along with all their Rights"
I also said......
"If American Patriots fail to do their duty and protect the Constitution, they will lose it along with all their Rights"
Too bad your fascist coup failed, cultist
This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
I also said......
"If American Patriots fail to do their duty and protect the Constitution, they will lose it along with all their Rights"
Too bad your fascist coup failed, cultist
Even worse, too bad yours succeeded, cultist elitist boot licker
Since you're probably a Chinese CCP troll it's a celebration that you can steal US elections
This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
that is not what the ruling was about. they ruled that Texas and the other states did not have standing to bring the suit. look up lack of standing, you might learn something and stop posting like an idiot.
I also said......
"If American Patriots fail to do their duty and protect the Constitution, they will lose it along with all their Rights"
Was this before or after the riots of the left?It's call Law and Order....We were told this SCOTUS would always rule in Trump’s favor. How is this possible?
They filed an amicus curia brief ( also known as friend of the court brief)This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
that is not what the ruling was about. they ruled that Texas and the other states did not have standing to bring the suit. look up lack of standing, you might learn something and stop posting like an idiot.
Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of U.S. Representative Mike Johnson and 105 Other Members of the U.S. House of Representatives in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
The same damn thing since the riots have nothing to do with the election clauseWas this before or after the riots of the left?It's call Law and Order....We were told this SCOTUS would always rule in Trump’s favor. How is this possible?
This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
that is not what the ruling was about. they ruled that Texas and the other states did not have standing to bring the suit. look up lack of standing, you might learn something and stop posting like an idiot.
Yeah, about 100 posters here told the cult that TX didn’t have standing. But the poorly educated cultists really thought TX could win. The ruling was effectively 9-0 as Thomas and Alito said there were no remedies.
It was all Kabuki Theater. But cults gonna cult.
Does yer Rascal hovers round have enough battery power to propel you into the front lines of another civil war?This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
that is not what the ruling was about. they ruled that Texas and the other states did not have standing to bring the suit. look up lack of standing, you might learn something and stop posting like an idiot.
Yeah, about 100 posters here told the cult that TX didn’t have standing. But the poorly educated cultists really thought TX could win. The ruling was effectively 9-0 as Thomas and Alito said there were no remedies.
It was all Kabuki Theater. But cults gonna cult.
like your fellow libs, you also do not understand what lack of standing means in a court of american law. It is not the final straw. It is certainly a set back, but not the end of the fight. It may be that the only workable remedy is secession or breaking up the country into conservative and liberal separate countries. None of us want that, but with the country so divided philosophically it may be the only solution. If we cannot live together, lets live separately. Then we can see which system actually works.
thats exactly what I said, dingleberry dipshit. They did not rule that the suit was unconstitutional, only that there was lack of standing to bring it to the court.They filed an amicus curia brief ( also known as friend of the court brief)This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable.
The US Constitution has no provisions for how states run an election.
The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center
Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholarsconstitutioncenter.org
I never was able to complete my law degree and I take great offence to the state AG who is ignorant of just how the Constitution works along with state control of elections....
that is not what the ruling was about. they ruled that Texas and the other states did not have standing to bring the suit. look up lack of standing, you might learn something and stop posting like an idiot.
Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of U.S. Representative Mike Johnson and 105 Other Members of the U.S. House of Representatives in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Identity of Amici Curiae
As members of the federal legislature, Amici seek to protect the constitutional role of state legislatures in establishing the manner by which Presidential Electors are appointed to ensure the Electoral College selects the candidate for President of the United States that was chosen by counting only lawful votes. Amici include 106 U.S. Representatives currently serving in the 116th Congress, listed above.
Relevance of Amicus Brief to Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint
This brief amicus curiae presents the concern of amici as Members of Congress, shared by untold millions of their constituents, that the unconstitutional irregularities involved in the 2020 presidential election cast doubt upon its outcome and the integrity of the American system of elections. Amici respectfully aver that the broad scope and impact of the various irregularities in the Defendant states necessitate careful and timely review by this Court.
On the merits, this amicus brief defends the constitutional authority of state legislatures as the only bodies duly authorized to establish the manner by which presidential electors are appointed, one of the central issues in the pending litigation. As members of the federal legislature, these amici seek to protect the constitutional role of state legislatures in determining the manner by which states choose their electors.
The Supreme Court rejected the brief because of a lack of legal standing for one state to sue another state over this matter, in other words it is unconstitutional....Which is exactly the rules under the Election Clause..
So eat me dip-shit...
