Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

[bripat9643]

Watch the the hearings. Your mommy doesn't work here.

She witnessed nothing, you fucking douchebag. It's all hearsay.

 

[bripat9643]

Because its not false. Whether or noth he went full apsehit or whether he was just verbally pissed off, he still wanted to meet the armed marchers at the Capital where he was pressuring Pence to fuck up the elector count.

He knew they were armed. He jizzed them up to go fight.
He sent them to the Capital where the count was being done. He didn't try to call them off until after Pence has been spirited out.

Since her testimony is a big fat lie, none of that is true.

 

[tahuyaman]

Because its not false. Whether or noth he went full apsehit or whether he was just verbally pissed off, he still wanted to meet the armed marchers at the Capital where he was pressuring Pence to fuck up the elector count.

He knew they were armed. He jizzed them up to go fight.
He sent them to the Capital where the count was being done. He didn't try to call them off until after Pence has been spirited out.

Actual witnesses say it's false. Third hand accounts say it's true.

 

[WEATHER53]

Watch the the hearings. Your mommy doesn't work here.

My mother is dead
Yours still tells your summer school short bus ass what to say.
What the woman “witnessed” was someone else’s mouth moving while they recounted their version of events. She heard them say. I think there is a word for that.
Back to name calling and dodging again for you.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Because its not false. Whether or noth he went full apsehit or whether he was just verbally pissed off, he still wanted to meet the armed marchers at the Capital where he was pressuring Pence to fuck up the elector count.

He knew they were armed. He jizzed them up to go fight.
He sent them to the Capital where the count was being done. He didn't try to call them off until after Pence has been spirited out.

BWHAAAAaaaaaaaa

This has been debunked over and over again... why do you persist in telling it? Firsthand witnesses say this never happened... yet you want to believe a third hand HEARSAY-gossiper.... LOL

 

[tahuyaman]

It's obvious that there are several,people here who refuse to discuss this in a rational manner. When you try you get responses of "fuck you you fucking traitor." That's unfortunate

 

[WEATHER53]

Because its not false. Whether or noth he went full apsehit or whether he was just verbally pissed off, he still wanted to meet the armed marchers at the Capital where he was pressuring Pence to fuck up the elector count.

He knew they were armed. He jizzed them up to go fight.
He sent them to the Capital where the count was being done. He didn't try to call them off until after Pence has been spirited out.

See the ABCs of what he wanted to do but didn’t do Dont Mean Shit because the motivation was Never Enacted
Though police in full swing

 

[Zincwarrior]

BWHAAAAaaaaaaaa

This has been debunked over and over again... why do you persist in telling it? Firsthand witnesses say this never happened... yet you want to believe a third hand HEARSAY-gossiper.... LOL

She was a direct witness. Unlike you I actually watched it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

She was a direct witness. Unlike you I actually watched it.

LOL... a direct witness to the event? nope... she heard it from friend who heard it from a friend... Sounds like a song... She has no credibility. Her story has been debunked by direct witnesses to the actual event.

 

[tahuyaman]

She was a direct witness. Unlike you I actually watched it.

She provided mostly third hand testimony. She's not credible. No one could be convicted of anything based on her testimony .

 

[Billiejeens]

---------------------------------------------------------


Which begs the question: What is the answer?

Saddle up, Skinnyjeans. Show us your dance-steps.

You could have asked more nicely.

It was in the Letter that Mo Brooks sent -

 

[Billiejeens]

She provided mostly third hand testimony. She's not credible. No one could be convicted of anything based on her testimony .

They are not looking for "convictions"

It is simply an infomercial -

It is the Sham Wow! of political discourse.

 

[tahuyaman]

They are not looking for "convictions"

It is simply an infomercial -

It is the Sham Wow! of political discourse.

They can't indict or seek a conviction

They aren't interested in seeking information either because they are looking only in one direction. This is a partisan side show. The true motive is to focus the public's away from the massive failures of the current administration and the Democrat majority. They are failing at that too. It's a shameful sham.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Attack the source rather than discuss the content.

Dont you get tired of being a cliche cultist.

Gateway is well known for its lies, distortions and right wing hyperbole . They immediatly painted her as being caught in a lie. There is no reason to belive that she knowingly lied. It is much more plausible that 1) she was told something that was not true and believed it because it was a trusted source, or 2) Her account of the incident is true, but the Secret Service- for whatever reason, decided that they did not want to put that information out there. Every other publication that reported on this matter simply stated that the Secret Service may be walking back that account of what happened and did not call Hutchison a liar. So in conclusion - it is very appropriate to attack the source. Don't you ever get tired of being a cliche cultist?

 

[Billiejeens]

They can't indict or seek a conviction

They aren't interested in seeking information either because they are looking only in one direction. This is a partisan side show. The true motive is to focus the public's away from the massive failures of the current administration and the Democrat majority. They are failing at that too. It's a shameful sham.

You are not wrong

The main purpose is to try and make President Trump not electable.

Each of The Party establishments fear a new President Trump more than they fear anything else in the world.

 

[tahuyaman]

You are not wrong

The main purpose is to try and make President Trump not electable.

Each of The Party establishments fear a new President Trump more than they fear anything else in the world.

It looks like they aren't accomplishing that goal either.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You are not wrong

The main purpose is to try and make President Trump not electable.

Each of The Party establishments fear a new President Trump more than they fear anything else in the world.

He is already unelectable. Republicans are not that stupid

 

[tahuyaman]

Gateway is well known for its lies, distortions and right wing hyperbole . They immediatly painted her as being caught in a lie. There is no reason to belive that she knowingly lied. It is much more plausible that 1) she was told something that was not true and believed it because it was a trusted source, or 2) Her account of the incident is true, but the Secret Service- for whatever reason, decided that they did not want to put that information out there. Every other publication that reported on this matter simply stated that the Secret Service may be walking back that account of what happened and did not call Hutchison a liar. So in conclusion - it is very appropriate to attack the source. Don't you ever get tired of being a cliche cultist?

What your version of a credible news / opinion publication?

 

[tahuyaman]

He is already unelectable. Republicans are not that stupid

Maybe, mabe not. Clearly the current administration is making him look much better.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

What your version of a credible news / opinion publication?

CNN, the NY Times, CNBC,The Huffington Post for starters