Thank God. Bill Cosby walking today

CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:
nope, I look at the language used. Vacated disposes of the conviction. It says it in the damn definition. The conviction never existed.

You are embarrassing yourself here:

Merriam-Webster

"Definition of conviction


1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law.

The Judges stated he was convicted and sentenced in court,

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

It is right there in front of you!

They vacated the conviction and sentencing because the Prosecutors wrongly charged him and compelled testimony under duress. There was a prior agreement not to charge Cosby of a crime on the woman, but the next Prosecutor made the charges and took him to trial anyway, which is a violation of the earlier agreement.

It is clear you didn't read much of anything.
And another court vacated that conviction. I gave you that definition. You can’t win this one

Ha ha, now YOU say the CONVICTION was Vacated, that means he was once convicted of something....... gee which is it?

Again the Judge stated: "For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

Gee he WAS Convicted and Sentenced in a Court Trial, unless you want to deny the trial existed and Conviction never happened....,.................., :abgg2q.jpg:
 
CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:
nope, I look at the language used. Vacated disposes of the conviction. It says it in the damn definition. The conviction never existed.

You are embarrassing yourself here:

Merriam-Webster

"Definition of conviction


1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law.

The Judges stated he was convicted and sentenced in court,

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

It is right there in front of you!

They vacated the conviction and sentencing because the Prosecutors wrongly charged him and compelled testimony under duress. There was a prior agreement not to charge Cosby of a crime on the woman, but the next Prosecutor made the charges and took him to trial anyway, which is a violation of the earlier agreement.

It is clear you didn't read much of anything.
And another court vacated that conviction. I gave you that definition. You can’t win this one

Ha ha, now YOU say the CONVICTION was Vacated, that means he was once convicted of something....... gee which is it?

Again the Judge stated: "For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

Gee he WAS Convicted and Sentenced in a Court Trial, unless you want to deny the trial existed and Conviction never happened....,.................., :abgg2q.jpg:
And definition of vacated conviction says it never existed. Back to innocent until proven!
 
CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:
nope, I look at the language used. Vacated disposes of the conviction. It says it in the damn definition. The conviction never existed.

You are embarrassing yourself here:

Merriam-Webster

"Definition of conviction


1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law.

The Judges stated he was convicted and sentenced in court,

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

It is right there in front of you!

They vacated the conviction and sentencing because the Prosecutors wrongly charged him and compelled testimony under duress. There was a prior agreement not to charge Cosby of a crime on the woman, but the next Prosecutor made the charges and took him to trial anyway, which is a violation of the earlier agreement.

It is clear you didn't read much of anything.
And another court vacated that conviction. I gave you that definition. You can’t win this one

Ha ha, now YOU say the CONVICTION was Vacated, that means he was once convicted of something....... gee which is it?

Again the Judge stated: "For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

Gee he WAS Convicted and Sentenced in a Court Trial, unless you want to deny the trial existed and Conviction never happened....,.................., :abgg2q.jpg:
And definition of vacated conviction says it never existed. Back to innocent until proven!
You are being illogical since for something to be vacated it has to first exist, which of course means it did exist.

vacate

  1. law
    cancel or annul (a judgment, contract, or charge).
    "the Justices vacated a ruling by the federal appeals court"
    synonyms:
    annul · invalidate · nullify · declare null and void · render null and void · void · revoke · rescind · retract · countermand · set aside · take back · withdraw · recall · repeal · overrule · override · abrogate · quash · extinguish · remit · retire · discharge · disannul · negate

I am laughing now as you are making at total fool of yourself.
 
I am calling it troublesome.
The original prosecutor said he would not be convicted without a confession, obviously meaning that her testimony was not going to convict due to lack of evidence and the looong time that past before she came forward.

Next time, PLEASE do even a smidge of honest research.

All that is true. HOWEVER, the original prosecutor made an offer to Mr. Cosby that if he testified truthfully, at the CIVIL trial, that prosecutor would not use any of the testimony against him in a criminal trial.

The next prosecutor stated that the agreement with the original prosecutor and Cosby had no bearing on him. At the civil trial, Mr. Cosby confessed to all the drugging, rapes, and sexual assaults going back decades. That next prosecutor used all that testimony to convict Cosby.

Cosby is guilty but millions of dollars found an attorney who found a loophole and danced through the conviction.
 
hCorrell I don't mind you disagreeing with my post, that's all well and good. But do you have anything proving my post is incorrect? I would think that you must, since you went to the trouble of disagreeing with it, so why don't you post the link? I will happily admit my error if there is an article or statement from the court somewhere that indicates the court called into question the veracity Constand's testimony.


IMO, these women traded sexual favors for help with their careers. That was prostitution, not rape. My biggest question is, did he follow though with the help.


A trade implies consent, not something that can be given when one has been dosed with quaaludes. Something Cosby readily admitted to having done in his deposition...
He didn't "readily admit".... that is the problem.

As you know, Cosby did readily admit, under oath that he drugged, raped, and sexually assaulted many women going back decades.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied
Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied
He is still guilty as a fact. But he is free by law.

Guilty of what? He wasn't pardoned. His charge was vacated. Meaning it never existed. He can't be guilty of a crime that he's not charged with.

I think he should sue the courts for wrongful conviction. FOR MILLIONS.
He was released because of an unethical agreement he made with a former DA. The PSC used the word 'unethical' in it's dissenting opinion. Unethical but binding.

Doesn't matter. Shouldn't have been prosecuted thus it was a wrongful conviction. Sue the fuck out of the state.
Sue the fuck out of Cosby like the first victim did. There are over 60 of them he drugged over the years. 60 different lawsuits. If he loses half of them he is as broke as Simpson.

Statute of limitations has run out on most.
 
Happy??...
Don't change the topic. You said anyone who hung out with Epstein is a pedo-rapist. Trump hung out with Epstein ... and you still love him.

That's you confirming my point. You automatically give a free pass to depraved Republicans. You do it with both Trump and Cosby.

Why do near 55% of white liberal women have deep emotional problems per the research.
Ah, some fine garbage science. You fall for anything the cult feeds you.

55% of you are not happy...LOLOL
Why do you think I'm a woman? II bet it's my calm, logical and non-emotional nature, as opposed to your overly-emotional nature.

You sound very unhappy. Have you considered that if getting humiliated by liberals is making you so unhappy, you could fix that by not saying so many stupid things to liberals?

Glad I could help.
The only flaw is Trump didn't hang out with Epstein. Trump barred Epstein from any of his properties.
Trump was BFF with Epstein and said they have the same taste in women
biden-malarkey-S.jpg
 
We don't know if he assaulted women or not, but he was never given proper due process in being charged.

Yes, as you know, we know well that he assaulted the women. Bill Cosby confessed, under oath, on the stand, at his civil trial.
How the fk do you know?
How do I know? Simple, I do research BEFORE posting. Try it, you'll like it. Plus, you won't make yourself look ignorant so darn often.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Just what is it with so many Trump cultists adoring sexual predators? Do they really not understand how bad it looks when you make a rapist your hero?

Cosby, in his deposition, admitted to getting quaaludes for the purpose of drugging and raping women. He's a rapist, by his own admission. Yes, he should have gotten off on the technicality. Prosecutor misconduct can't be allowed to stand. He's still a rapist, just not one convicted by the legal system.

So, Sloopy, why do you adore rapists like Cosby so much? Do you think that will earn you higher status in the Trump cult?


Giving someone drugs, so that they can take them is not "drugging them".

DRUGGING THEM, implies that he slipped them into a drink without their knowledge.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Just what is it with so many Trump cultists adoring sexual predators? Do they really not understand how bad it looks when you make a rapist your hero?

Cosby, in his deposition, admitted to getting quaaludes for the purpose of drugging and raping women. He's a rapist, by his own admission. Yes, he should have gotten off on the technicality. Prosecutor misconduct can't be allowed to stand. He's still a rapist, just not one convicted by the legal system.

So, Sloopy, why do you adore rapists like Cosby so much? Do you think that will earn you higher status in the Trump cult?


Giving someone drugs, so that they can take them is not "drugging them".

DRUGGING THEM, implies that he slipped them into a drink without their knowledge.
All I know is that I'd have to slip some drugs in my drink for this. Plus 10 Viagras..............Or this thing would have to slip them on me and have her(its) way

C'mon Man!!!.....Give me a break

1625230993123.png
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Just what is it with so many Trump cultists adoring sexual predators? Do they really not understand how bad it looks when you make a rapist your hero?

Cosby, in his deposition, admitted to getting quaaludes for the purpose of drugging and raping women. He's a rapist, by his own admission. Yes, he should have gotten off on the technicality. Prosecutor misconduct can't be allowed to stand. He's still a rapist, just not one convicted by the legal system.

So, Sloopy, why do you adore rapists like Cosby so much? Do you think that will earn you higher status in the Trump cult?


Giving someone drugs, so that they can take them is not "drugging them".

DRUGGING THEM, implies that he slipped them into a drink without their knowledge.
All I know is that I'd have to slip some drugs in my drink for this. Plus 10 Viagras..............Or this thing would have to slip them on me and have her(its) way

C'mon Man!!!.....Give me a break

View attachment 508010
If I was a huge celebrity I sure as hell wouldn't pick The Bride Of Frankenstickel for a quickie
 
Correll I don't mind you disagreeing with my post, that's all well and good. But do you have anything proving my post is incorrect? I would think that you must, since you went to the trouble of disagreeing with it, so why don't you post the link? I will happily admit my error if there is an article or statement from the court somewhere that indicates the court called into question the veracity Constand's testimony.


IMO, these women traded sexual favors for help with their careers. That was prostitution, not rape. My biggest question is, did he follow though with the help.


A trade implies consent, not something that can be given when one has been dosed with quaaludes. Something Cosby readily admitted to having done in his deposition...


Providing drugs to a woman, is not drugging them. BIG difference. That that was conflated in this trial was a serious injustice.

He didn’t provide anything. And he admitted to it at his trial. Cosby USA total piece of shit. I can see his allure with trumphumpers.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Just what is it with so many Trump cultists adoring sexual predators? Do they really not understand how bad it looks when you make a rapist your hero?

Cosby, in his deposition, admitted to getting quaaludes for the purpose of drugging and raping women. He's a rapist, by his own admission. Yes, he should have gotten off on the technicality. Prosecutor misconduct can't be allowed to stand. He's still a rapist, just not one convicted by the legal system.

So, Sloopy, why do you adore rapists like Cosby so much? Do you think that will earn you higher status in the Trump cult?


Giving someone drugs, so that they can take them is not "drugging them".

DRUGGING THEM, implies that he slipped them into a drink without their knowledge.
All I know is that I'd have to slip some drugs in my drink for this. Plus 10 Viagras..............Or this thing would have to slip them on me and have her(its) way

C'mon Man!!!.....Give me a break

View attachment 508010


Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.
 
Correll I don't mind you disagreeing with my post, that's all well and good. But do you have anything proving my post is incorrect? I would think that you must, since you went to the trouble of disagreeing with it, so why don't you post the link? I will happily admit my error if there is an article or statement from the court somewhere that indicates the court called into question the veracity Constand's testimony.


IMO, these women traded sexual favors for help with their careers. That was prostitution, not rape. My biggest question is, did he follow though with the help.


A trade implies consent, not something that can be given when one has been dosed with quaaludes. Something Cosby readily admitted to having done in his deposition...


Providing drugs to a woman, is not drugging them. BIG difference. That that was conflated in this trial was a serious injustice.

He didn’t provide anything. And he admitted to it at his trial. Cosby USA total piece of shit. I can see his allure with trumphumpers.


You are raving.
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.
 

Forum List

Back
Top