Thank God. Bill Cosby walking today

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Just what is it with so many Trump cultists adoring sexual predators? Do they really not understand how bad it looks when you make a rapist your hero?

Cosby, in his deposition, admitted to getting quaaludes for the purpose of drugging and raping women. He's a rapist, by his own admission. Yes, he should have gotten off on the technicality. Prosecutor misconduct can't be allowed to stand. He's still a rapist, just not one convicted by the legal system.

So, Sloopy, why do you adore rapists like Cosby so much? Do you think that will earn you higher status in the Trump cult?


Giving someone drugs, so that they can take them is not "drugging them".

DRUGGING THEM, implies that he slipped them into a drink without their knowledge.
All I know is that I'd have to slip some drugs in my drink for this. Plus 10 Viagras..............Or this thing would have to slip them on me and have her(its) way

C'mon Man!!!.....Give me a break

View attachment 508010


Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.
LOLOL..........................It looks like it has a penis period.

No man worth his stones would ever even attempt to do that thing. She doesn't even qualify for the Pivot Girl in a mass bukake session

If one of them went to the authorities in all this time, I would believe them. Other than that opportunists who used Cosby to their benefit....Typical Hollywood sluts....A dime a dozen

When you show the many pics of Murdering Hillary with Weinstein and not a peep........... you know libturds don't give a shit about these women. They are only useful politically and suicided if they get out of line
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.


I understand your point and it is valid.

The point I was trying to make was the testimony he gave in the civil suit was enough to get him convicted. The testimony was rightfully thrown out but that doesn't change what he admitted to doing.
 
The only flaw is Trump didn't hang out with Epstein. Trump barred Epstein from any of his properties.
Only after many years of being Trump's BFF. And the fallout was over a business deal, not over their shared tastes in sex crimes, especially their love of the young ones.

So here you are, running cover for those that, and confirming my point. The Republican party orders party members to excuse any crimes by a Republican, especially the sex crimes.

Again, this is why it's so good to be a liberal. We won't burn in Hell, being that we support the conviction of any sex criminal, no matter what party they're from. For example, If there's any actual evidence against Bill Clinton, we'll support prosecuting him.
 
I am calling it troublesome.
The original prosecutor said he would not be convicted without a confession, obviously meaning that her testimony was not going to convict due to lack of evidence and the looong time that past before she came forward.
correct. What they used was all of these women as some sort of evidence, which doesn't prove shit. One of those women would have had to have had some photos of the drugs supposedly provided. And that she didn't know she was getting them. Total horse manure.
 
So here you are, running cover for those that, and confirming my point. The Republican party orders party members to excuse any crimes by a Republican, especially the sex crimes.

Again, this is why it's so good to be a liberal. We won't burn in Hell, being that we support the conviction of any sex criminal, no matter what party they're from. For example, If there's any actual evidence against Bill Clinton, we'll support prosecuting him.

Chappaquiddick_incident-S.jpg
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.


I understand your point and it is valid.

The point I was trying to make was the testimony he gave in the civil suit was enough to get him convicted. The testimony was rightfully thrown out but that doesn't change what he admitted to doing.

WHat he admitted to was wrong. What he did, and the women did was wrong. It was not rape though.
Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.

How sad. To you, the abuser is the victim.


Well, tit for tat sexual harassment, depends on the individual power relationships who is a victim and who is not. Were they starving want a be actresses who had no other options but to sleep with powerful men to get jobs, or were they just greedy and wanted a short cut in exchange for services rendered?
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.


I understand your point and it is valid.

The point I was trying to make was the testimony he gave in the civil suit was enough to get him convicted. The testimony was rightfully thrown out but that doesn't change what he admitted to doing.

WHat he admitted to was wrong. What he did, and the women did was wrong. It was not rape though.
Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.

How sad. To you, the abuser is the victim.


Well, tit for tat sexual harassment, depends on the individual power relationships who is a victim and who is not. Were they starving want a be actresses who had no other options but to sleep with powerful men to get jobs, or were they just greedy and wanted a short cut in exchange for services rendered?


That is always the big question, isn't it?

Is it some bitch that was just trying to get something or punish some guy she had a gruge with or was it real rape/harassment?

I suspect in the entertainment business it is usually more the former than the later. However, it is just as likely that a big name celebrity thinks that he is entitled to get all the nookie he wants.
 
I'm still a bit confused why it got overturned, but I'm still definitely happy about it!! :D
Apparently Potterhead, the prosecutor in Crosby’s case had previously made a deal with Crosby that he would not be tried. I wasn’t aware that these types of “deals” override determining innocence in a court of law and it’s beyond my comprehension as a non-legal type. This type of deal making thwarts the justice system, as in a kick to the teeth imo. But again, if that’s what’s on the law books I guess that’s what it is, but it’s total lunacy in my opinion.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied
Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied
Yeah?
Well... his release says something doesn't it?
You can't just go around violating laws in order to convict eh?

I questioned this thing from day one. The yeeaaaars of saying nothing... then all of a sudden full on "let's get him!"
Doesn't straight up say she lied, but it doesn't look good for her that the higher court basically said her testimony was troublesome, and her motive to come out years later also troublesome.
There was ample evidence that Cosby was a sexual abuser

The court did not disregard that fact
No there wasn't. That is why they let him go.
You do understand the word "insufficient" right? You do understand the word "troublesome" also right?
Me personally, I think he is like a LOT of entertainers in that era... generally a LOT of them were pieces of shit to women.
But that doesn't hold up in court. I don't convict people based on opinion and "probably".
I don't think for one second Crosby did anything any worse than President Clinton has done in his past also.
What convinced me of his guilt was the fact that 40 women came forward besides this one in which case he was tried. Do I think with 100% certainty that all 40 women were truthful and that none wanted to just get on the bandwagon for whatever reason to make a name for themselves? No. Just looking at the numbers I would, however, be hard-pressed to believe that all 40 would be lying.
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.


I understand your point and it is valid.

The point I was trying to make was the testimony he gave in the civil suit was enough to get him convicted. The testimony was rightfully thrown out but that doesn't change what he admitted to doing.

WHat he admitted to was wrong. What he did, and the women did was wrong. It was not rape though.
Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.

How sad. To you, the abuser is the victim.


Well, tit for tat sexual harassment, depends on the individual power relationships who is a victim and who is not. Were they starving want a be actresses who had no other options but to sleep with powerful men to get jobs, or were they just greedy and wanted a short cut in exchange for services rendered?
drugging a women till she has no power over her body and then having sex with an uncouncious woman is rape. no one understands unless they are victmi, of this crap. cosby is a sick preditor.
 
Pretty much just like it’s illegal to murder Babbit; it’s illegal to convict Cosby the way he was.
The women wanted favors and expected future benefits. When they got a one timer instead, they got revenge.
 
The shithead was let out on a technically. The facts of him sexually harassing women were indisputable.

Of course him being a Big Negro the Liberals are glad to see him walk.


SEXUAL HARASSMENT, is the real issue. And the victims weren't the women that has sex with him in exchange for him helping their careers.

Those women exchanged sexual favors for career advancement and the money it would bring.


The real victims are the women who wanted to be actresses, but did not want to have sex with men in exchange for roles.


They were sidelined by women and men playing the casting couch game.


I understand your point and it is valid.

The point I was trying to make was the testimony he gave in the civil suit was enough to get him convicted. The testimony was rightfully thrown out but that doesn't change what he admitted to doing.

WHat he admitted to was wrong. What he did, and the women did was wrong. It was not rape though.
Im sure she looked better ten years ago.


Some of those women were smoking hot back in the day, when they wanted Bill to help their careers.

How sad. To you, the abuser is the victim.


Well, tit for tat sexual harassment, depends on the individual power relationships who is a victim and who is not. Were they starving want a be actresses who had no other options but to sleep with powerful men to get jobs, or were they just greedy and wanted a short cut in exchange for services rendered?

How could it NOT be rape? Regardless of how much a woman, or man, wanted a part, or a "break", that does NOT excuse them being drugged and raped.

You suggesting that it was the women's fault is just sick.
 
Pretty much just like it’s illegal to murder Babbit; it’s illegal to convict Cosby the way he was.
The women wanted favors and expected future benefits. When they got a one timer instead, they got revenge.
Cosby initiated the contact making promises to these woman and when got them were he wanted to with drugs . to were they have no controll over their bodies is rape. this guy is sick preditor. only another victim can see it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top