'That is a fact-plain and simple: Ex-DHS secretary says Putin directly ordered disruption of 2016 el

[Missouri_Mike]

View attachment 134558

He's not being investigated.

 

[whitehall]

The ex DHC's testimony proves two things. #1. the intelligence networks that we depend on seem to be reactive rather than proactive and not really that good at their jobs and #2 the former DHC's testimony indicates that there is no evidence that the election process was penetrated. So what we have is another Seinfeld adventure and an investigation about nothing. The strange thing is that Americans are well aware of the witch hunt (five out of five special elections republican wins) but the left keeps playing by the same old rules as if the internet was never invented.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What does DHS stand for, Democrat Hacking Suckers?

 

[easyt65]

Why exactly don't you care that Russia attacked the American election in 2016?

Russians trying to hack states' elections? One would expect that. Obama himself declared nations try to do such things all the time.

So, them trying un-successfully to do so (former DHS Director twstified no votes were changed / effected due to attempts by the Russians) is NOT as big a deal as the President of the United States trying to fo so in an attempt to seize control of ALL state election processes just weeks before the election.

The Democrats rigged their primaries.

The Democrats cheated in debates.

The Democrats engaged in ELECTION FRAUD during their primaries.

They were cheating their asses off for Hillary WHILE Barry and his Cabinet were breaking laws in an atempt to sabotage Trump's election bid.

SO IF BARRY HAD SUCCESSFULLY HACKED INDIANA AND GEORGIA ELECTIONS, GIVING THEM A REASON TO SEIZE CONTROL OF ALL STATE ELECTIONS IN TIME FOR THE ELECTION, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK WOULD HAPPEN?

HILLARY WOULD HAVE MIRACULOUSLY WON IN A RECORD-SETTING LANDSLIDE ... WITH HELP TO WIN JUST LIKE SHE GOT TO HELP HER BEAT BERNIE!

THAT'S why I am more concerned about Obama trying to prevent a fair / honest democratic election.

Russians are expected to f* America over. Obama is another story.

 

[radical right]

The ex DHC's testimony proves two things. #1. the intelligence networks that we depend on seem to be reactive rather than proactive and not really that good at their jobs and #2 the former DHC's testimony indicates that there is no evidence that the election process was penetrated

The current count of state election systems that were broken into: 21

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Putin ordered his agents to infiltrate and tell the truth?

Thank you Mr Putin.

Putin ordered his agents to try to disrupt the U.S. election- an attack on the United States.

And you are support Putin's attack on the U.S.

You are a traitor.

No the democrats are the traitors just for what they did to Bernie Sanders. The Russians merely told the truth.

No one can be a traitor for opposing democrats. They need to be destroyed for the good of what remains of this country. If Putin helps, that makes him today's Lafayette.

 

[OKTexas]

Still no evidence.

And you expect the CIA and Homeland Security to provide details of how they tracked the hacking- why?

Why exactly are you so determined to not believe that Russia attacked the U.S.- despite what the FBI, the CIA and Homeland Security have told us?

They lie to us constantly.

So......who do you believe?

Trump lies to you constantly- almost every day.
Alex Jones lies to you constantly

IF the United States suffers another 9/11 type attack- and the FBI says that ISIS was responsible for the attack- would you believe the FBI?

Or would you demand proof before we responded?

Every American Intelligence agency says that Russia attacked the 2016 American election. You think that they are all lying unless they provide proof.

And you believe Intelligence agencies are going to reveal their sources to you to convince you.

Actually you are the one lying. Clapper said only 3 intel agencies were involved in preparing the report. And only two of those had a high level of confidence. You'd be a bit more believable if you didn't keep repeating known lies.


.

"Actually you are the one lying. Clapper said only 3 intel agencies were involved in preparing the report"

Please provide the quote where you are claiming I am lying. I never once mention Clapper.

This is what you said:
My bold.
"Every American Intelligence agency says that Russia attacked the 2016 American election."

There are 17 intel agencies, 14 weren't involved in the evaluation and report. So yeah, you are lying because 14 intelligence agencies didn't even speak to, or investigate the matter.


.

 

[bripat9643]

'That is a fact-plain and simple: Ex-DHS secretary says Putin directly ordered disruption of 2016 el
Source: Raw Story


21 Jun 2017 at 10:43 ET

Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on Wednesday bluntly shot down any doubts about whether Russia was responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee that was intended to disrupt the 2016 presidential election.

“The Russian government, at the direction of Vladimir Putin himself, orchestrated cyber attacks on our nation for the purpose of influence our election,” he said. “That is a fact, plain and simple.”

President Donald Trump has regularly hedged in public when asked if he believes Russia interfered in the 2016 election. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer ..............................

Read more: ‘That is a fact — plain and simple’: Ex-DHS secretary says Putin directly ordered disruption of 2016 election

Trumps a traitor and Reagan would have had him arrested. Trumps scum...

Based on what?

 

[Freewill]

The ex DHC's testimony proves two things. #1. the intelligence networks that we depend on seem to be reactive rather than proactive and not really that good at their jobs and #2 the former DHC's testimony indicates that there is no evidence that the election process was penetrated

The current count of state election systems that were broken into: 21

Election officials need to stop putting their unprotected servers in the crapper. Did we not learn anything from Hillary?

 

[OKTexas]

The ex DHC's testimony proves two things. #1. the intelligence networks that we depend on seem to be reactive rather than proactive and not really that good at their jobs and #2 the former DHC's testimony indicates that there is no evidence that the election process was penetrated

The current count of state election systems that were broken into: 21

Wrong, they tried on 29, do you need a definition of "tried"?


.

 

[tinydancer]

'That is a fact-plain and simple: Ex-DHS secretary says Putin directly ordered disruption of 2016 el
Source: Raw Story


21 Jun 2017 at 10:43 ET

Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on Wednesday bluntly shot down any doubts about whether Russia was responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee that was intended to disrupt the 2016 presidential election.

“The Russian government, at the direction of Vladimir Putin himself, orchestrated cyber attacks on our nation for the purpose of influence our election,” he said. “That is a fact, plain and simple.”

President Donald Trump has regularly hedged in public when asked if he believes Russia interfered in the 2016 election. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer ..............................

Read more: ‘That is a fact — plain and simple’: Ex-DHS secretary says Putin directly ordered disruption of 2016 election

Trumps a traitor and Reagan would have had him arrested. Trumps scum...

Based on what?

That's what I was wondering. There's been no proof of it. Sheesh. These people are whackos making insane accusations with no evidence and then they have the balls to bitch that Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorist.

 

[Freewill]

Last i heard, on CNN, is that the investigation is now looking in to finances and if Trump took illegal money from Russia. After they fail to do that they are going to go back to the two scoops of ice cream and start all over.

 

[blackhawk]

Unless you provide evidence to support the claim then what you are doing is giving an opinion not a fact.