Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #461
That display was as appropriate for this branch of government as it was for Justices Kagan and Ginsburg to have presided over gay weddings while the question of "should the fed preside over gay weddings" was pending in the appeal's system on its way up to their Court.If that is what they are going to use OUR white house for WE THE PEOPLE pays for. For a Presidents own pleasure just over some freaking COURT RULING and a sign to tell others FU if you don't agree with this ruling. then I'd like it see torn down. He can go back and live in his shanty they own in Chicago. and take that Mother'in'law with them
You don't practice tyranny and then flaunt it in the face of the People. In the old days they used to hang them for these types of offenses. And not without excellent reason too.
That's why I keep asking for the dates this light display was set up. Those dates area very important given the arrogance of the display. Because arrogance against the Governed + Foreknowledge of a Judicial Ruling by the Executive Branch = conspiracy & treason.