That shining "god" Obama couldn't even with nearly a $1 trillion in shovel ready jobs do this!

[Faun]

Why should he try again when the BEA confirms what he said?

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

LOL

Why are you so afraid to answer my question?

Were those numbers annual or quarterly?

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

LOL

Why are you so afraid to answer my question?

Were those numbers annual or quarterly?

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

 

[Faun]

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

​

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

LOL

Why are you so afraid to answer my question?

Were those numbers annual or quarterly?

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

LOL

Why are you so afraid to answer my question?

Were those numbers annual or quarterly?

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You are wrong by the way, Obama did have a year with more than 3% GDP growth. In the 365 days between Apr 1st, 2014 and March 31st, 2015 the GDP average growth was over 3%.

try again
View attachment 203498

Why should he try again when the BEA confirms what he said?

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Democrat "stimulus" was actually a $trillion dollar$ looting spree.
Democrats are thieves

 

[Faun]

LOL

Why are you so afraid to answer my question?

Were those numbers annual or quarterly?

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

Why? Because you’re an imbecile, that’s why. I left no numbers out. I listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

Not only are you an imbecile for thinking I left numbers out when I didn’t, but you’re a complete idiot for posting a link to GDP by quarter which showed my list was accurate while you idiotically said my numbers were wrong.

And lastly, you proved yourself to be a scared little pussy. Too scared to answer the simple question of whether the figures you mentioned, “0” and “0.5,” were annual or quarterly. And because you’re an idiotic imbecile, you didn’t even realize I already knew the answer since you posted a link to quarterly figures.

And the reason you were too scared to admit you posted quarterly figures is because you moronically challenged...

tell you what try and Identify were I was talking about a quarter and not the year?

... and you demonstrated you’re not man enough to admit you had in fact talked about quarterly figures.

So now we all see you’re a cowardly idiotic imbecile with no character. In other words, a typical USMB conservative.

Thanks for playin’.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I have why are you afraid to accept the answer? is it because it will make your position look like a failure lol
What did I say about your numbers?

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

Why? Because you’re an imbecile, that’s why. I left no numbers out. I listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

Not only are you an imbecile for thinking I left numbers out when I didn’t, but you’re a complete idiot for posting a link to GDP by quarter which showed my list was accurate while you idiotically said my numbers were wrong.

And lastly, you proved yourself to be a scared little pussy. Too scared to answer the simple question of whether the figures you mentioned, “0” and “0.5,” were annual or quarterly. And because you’re an idiotic imbecile, you didn’t even realize I already knew the answer since you posted a link to quarterly figures.

And the reason you were too scared to admit you posted quarterly figures is because you moronically challenged...

tell you what try and Identify were I was talking about a quarter and not the year?

... and you demonstrated you’re not man enough to admit you had in fact talked about quarterly figures.

So now we all see you’re a cowardly idiotic imbecile with no character. In other words, a typical USMB conservative.

Thanks for playin’.

You left out a bunch of numbers why did you do it? hell you even left out all of 2011 or was it 2012 you are fvcking loony toons

 

[bigrebnc1775]

try again
View attachment 203498

Why should he try again when the BEA confirms what he said?

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did he even left out one year

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why should he try again when the BEA confirms what he said?

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

Why? Because you’re an imbecile, that’s why. I left no numbers out. I listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

Not only are you an imbecile for thinking I left numbers out when I didn’t, but you’re a complete idiot for posting a link to GDP by quarter which showed my list was accurate while you idiotically said my numbers were wrong.

And lastly, you proved yourself to be a scared little pussy. Too scared to answer the simple question of whether the figures you mentioned, “0” and “0.5,” were annual or quarterly. And because you’re an idiotic imbecile, you didn’t even realize I already knew the answer since you posted a link to quarterly figures.

And the reason you were too scared to admit you posted quarterly figures is because you moronically challenged...

tell you what try and Identify were I was talking about a quarter and not the year?

... and you demonstrated you’re not man enough to admit you had in fact talked about quarterly figures.

So now we all see you’re a cowardly idiotic imbecile with no character. In other words, a typical USMB conservative.

Thanks for playin’.

You left out a bunch of numbers why did you do it? hell you even left out all of 2011 or was it 2012 you are fvcking loony toons

One more time..

He listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

That means that if a quarter was not over 3%, he did not list it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed

what I said

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

no they didn't your link never showed 0 growth
or that 0.5 growth
or that lose

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

​

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

No, but it was HIS position. He gave a list of every quarter that was over 3%, and then you ask him why he left off the ones not over 3%.

That would be like me giving you a list of Super Bowl Champs and then you asked why I left the Jags off of it.

I hate to break this to you, but you are really just not a very smart person

 

[Faun]

You said they were missing. You haven’t said if those numbers are annual or quarterly.

And by the way, I was not missing any numbers. I said I was listing all the quarters under Obama with 3% or higher GDP growth and I listed them all.

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

Why? Because you’re an imbecile, that’s why. I left no numbers out. I listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

Not only are you an imbecile for thinking I left numbers out when I didn’t, but you’re a complete idiot for posting a link to GDP by quarter which showed my list was accurate while you idiotically said my numbers were wrong.

And lastly, you proved yourself to be a scared little pussy. Too scared to answer the simple question of whether the figures you mentioned, “0” and “0.5,” were annual or quarterly. And because you’re an idiotic imbecile, you didn’t even realize I already knew the answer since you posted a link to quarterly figures.

And the reason you were too scared to admit you posted quarterly figures is because you moronically challenged...

tell you what try and Identify were I was talking about a quarter and not the year?

... and you demonstrated you’re not man enough to admit you had in fact talked about quarterly figures.

So now we all see you’re a cowardly idiotic imbecile with no character. In other words, a typical USMB conservative.

Thanks for playin’.

You left out a bunch of numbers why did you do it? hell you even left out all of 2011 or was it 2012 you are fvcking loony toons

Why are you blaming me because you’re too rightarded to understand, ”quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...”

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

No, but it was HIS position. He gave a list of every quarter that was over 3%, and then you ask him why he left off the ones not over 3%.

That would be like me giving you a list of Super Bowl Champs and then you asked why I left the Jags off of it.

I hate to break this to you, but you are really just not a very smart person

It wasn't my position it never was. I said he left out a lot of the numbers. He even missed a whole year.
Keep digging sooner or later you'll realize you're going down.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I don't recall that being my position either
again why did you leave out most of the numbers?

I just said why. Exactly how rightarded are you?

Now then, stop being such a fucking pussy and answer the question...

When you spoke about 0 growth and 0.5 growth — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
yes when I mention the numbers I pointed out that you left some out
WHY?

Why? Because you’re an imbecile, that’s why. I left no numbers out. I listed every quarter under Obama that was 3% or higher.

Not only are you an imbecile for thinking I left numbers out when I didn’t, but you’re a complete idiot for posting a link to GDP by quarter which showed my list was accurate while you idiotically said my numbers were wrong.

And lastly, you proved yourself to be a scared little pussy. Too scared to answer the simple question of whether the figures you mentioned, “0” and “0.5,” were annual or quarterly. And because you’re an idiotic imbecile, you didn’t even realize I already knew the answer since you posted a link to quarterly figures.

And the reason you were too scared to admit you posted quarterly figures is because you moronically challenged...

tell you what try and Identify were I was talking about a quarter and not the year?

... and you demonstrated you’re not man enough to admit you had in fact talked about quarterly figures.

So now we all see you’re a cowardly idiotic imbecile with no character. In other words, a typical USMB conservative.

Thanks for playin’.

You left out a bunch of numbers why did you do it? hell you even left out all of 2011 or was it 2012 you are fvcking loony toons

Why are you blaming me because you’re too rightarded to understand, ”quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...”

here you go

 

[Harpy Eagle]

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

No, but it was HIS position. He gave a list of every quarter that was over 3%, and then you ask him why he left off the ones not over 3%.

That would be like me giving you a list of Super Bowl Champs and then you asked why I left the Jags off of it.

I hate to break this to you, but you are really just not a very smart person

It wasn't my position it never was. I said he left out a lot of the numbers. He even missed a whole year.
Keep digging sooner or later you'll realize you're going down.

Nobody fucking said it was your position, but it was Faun's position...why can you not grasp this simple fact.

He provided a list of every quarter over 3% and then you ask him why he left off the quarters not over 3%?

Can you not understand how stupid this makes you look?

If I asked you for a list of every POTUS in the history of the country and then attack you for leaving off Bob Dole and Al Gore, would that makes sense to you?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

No, but it was HIS position. He gave a list of every quarter that was over 3%, and then you ask him why he left off the ones not over 3%.

That would be like me giving you a list of Super Bowl Champs and then you asked why I left the Jags off of it.

I hate to break this to you, but you are really just not a very smart person

It wasn't my position it never was. I said he left out a lot of the numbers. He even missed a whole year.
Keep digging sooner or later you'll realize you're going down.

Nobody fucking said it was your position, but it was Faun's position...why can you not grasp this simple fact.

He provided a list of every quarter over 3% and then you ask him why he left off the quarters not over 3%?

Can you not understand how stupid this makes you look?

If I asked you for a list of every POTUS in the history of the country and then attack you for leaving off Bob Dole and Al Gore, would that makes sense to you?

And I pointed out that he left out a lot of the numbers how hard is that for you to comprehend?

 

[Faun]

That’s what you say now. What you said earlier was...

​

... so that 0 growth and 0.5 growth you were talking about — were those annual figures or quarterly figures?

Now don’t be so afraid to answer.

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did, he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

Again I don't recall that being my position either
And I fixed it.

LOLOL

Why are you blaming others for your mentalconservative condition?

Faun: ”Quarters of 3% or higher during Obama’s terms...”

bigrebnc1775: ”YOUR NUMBERS ARE SOMEWHAT WRONG”​

See that ^^^ ?

You even responded to my post where I said I was posting only quarters of 3% or more; which I did in response to a fellow rightard of yours who idiotically claimed Obama never had a quarter above 3%.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Again you left out a lot of the numbers that was what I pointed out

He did not leave out any numbers because he specifically stated that his list was just the quarters over 3%.

The problem is not his leaving out numbers, it is your lack of basic reading comprehension...which explains why you do not know the difference between a year and a quarter.

ding bat he did he even left out one year

Was there a quarter in that year that got over 3%?

I am not sure why this is so hard for you.

Love your grammar by the way "he did he"...what the hell does that mean?

It means he’s retarded.

I am pretty convinced we are dealing with another Russian bot that was not very well programmed. Fake avatar, fake gun picture and the IQ of a head of cabbage.

You would be mistaken like all liberals are
AFSC 81150
NRA lifetime member
GOA lifetime member
NCGO member