fncceo
Diamond Member
- Nov 29, 2016
- 43,178
- 35,962
- 3,615
joining elements in an Ehrenmeyer Flask to form amino acids.....
Not an Erlenmeyer flask,
![MU_apparatus.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.daviddarling.info%2Fimages%2FMU_apparatus.jpg&hash=b7062b098800e18bd3c4dc6aad4141e7)
This is an Erlenmeyer flask
![H-4917.250.png](https://www.humboldtmfg.com/product-images/lrg/H-4917.250.png)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
joining elements in an Ehrenmeyer Flask to form amino acids.....
I just want to know why you think the debris from this explosion likes to listen to Beethoven.
And yet all we are are an assembly of atoms.I just want to know why you think the debris from this explosion likes to listen to Beethoven.
Because, you, I, and Beethoven ... are all debris from that explosion.
And yet all we are are an assembly of atoms.
Which means atoms like Beethoven. At least most atoms.
Why?
Seems obvious there is something called life. All life is based on matter but not all matter is alive, again obvious.So you believe there is something beyond matter which is life?
Nice picture of a bunch of atoms.And yet all we are are an assembly of atoms.
Which means atoms like Beethoven. At least most atoms.
Why?
![]()
Ah, now are getting somewhere.Seems obvious there is something called life. All life is based on matter but not all matter is alive, again obvious.So you believe there is something beyond matter which is life?
I've never encountered life that was not composed of matter, have you?
Nice picture of a bunch of atoms.And yet all we are are an assembly of atoms.
Which means atoms like Beethoven. At least most atoms.
Why?
![]()
Atoms that will exist long after we die.
Atoms have nothing in the game. A carbon atom does not care if it is in my nose or on my desk. It will be around a thousand years from now.
Evolution is a fact, we can see it but that doesn't change anything, the evidence is overwhelming. We can't see the atoms that compose us and likely never will, but does anyone doubt they exist?...but they love to pretend that Darwin's theory is a fact.
It isn't.
Can life be destroyed?Nice picture of a bunch of atoms.And yet all we are are an assembly of atoms.
Which means atoms like Beethoven. At least most atoms.
Why?
![]()
Atoms that will exist long after we die.
Atoms have nothing in the game. A carbon atom does not care if it is in my nose or on my desk. It will be around a thousand years from now.
Matter cannot be created or destroyed
Life can
Why did life begin at only one single point in time according to evolutionists?Evolution is a fact, we can see it but that doesn't change anything, the evidence is overwhelming. We can't see the atoms that compose us and likely never will, but does anyone doubt they exist?...but they love to pretend that Darwin's theory is a fact.
It isn't.
I have no idea, maybe I am as smart as Jung, because I have no idea who he is.Are you circuitously trying to talk about Jung's Theory of Anima and Animus?
Life is inseparable from matter. Although many here might not agree, if you are a Democrat you are a human being even if not all human beings are Democrats.Ah, now are getting somewhere.
Yes, there is something that is not matter that is life, but uses matter.
How do you know life is inseparable from matter? There are so many cases of life after death experiences where people describe events around their bodies that many emergency rooms now have markers in the room in the hopes one of these events the person can identify the marker.Life is inseparable from matter. Although many here might not agree, if you are a Democrat you are a human being even if not all human beings are Democrats.Ah, now are getting somewhere.
Yes, there is something that is not matter that is life, but uses matter.
Because you have it backwards. Evolutionists don't claim that life begin at only one single point in time, they claim that all living things we see today and just about every fossil we've ever found can be traced back to the same ancestral population. Life man have begun many times but it appears there was only one winner. Possibly a fusion of multiple early life forms.Why did life begin at only one single point in time according to evolutionists?
Why are we not seeing new life emerging from the mud today? You can't blame time, your beginning of life happened long ago, and time keeps on ticking.
So you are claiming that every evolution tree is wrong? That new life is emerging in mud as you read this?Because you have it backwards. Evolutionists don't claim that life begin at only one single point in time, they claim that all living things we see today and just about every fossil we've ever found can be traced back to the same ancestral population. Life man have begun many times but it appears there was only one winner. Possibly a fusion of multiple early life forms.Why did life begin at only one single point in time according to evolutionists?
Why are we not seeing new life emerging from the mud today? You can't blame time, your beginning of life happened long ago, and time keeps on ticking.
It is not impossible for new life to emerge from the mud today, just highly unlikely. Conditions are vastly different and there are hungry plants and animals already here.
There is no mechanism or theory for it and I have never experienced anything supernatural. No evidence = no belief but that is just me.How do you know life is inseparable from matter?
if you are a Democrat you are a human being
Nothing I wrote contradicts the tree you posted or said anyone was wrong.So you are claiming that every evolution tree is wrong? That new life is emerging in mud as you read this?
What's your evidence that everyone is wrong but you?