- Thread starter
- #41
8. As part of the definition of God is omniscienceā¦.one must suppose that when God created a being with free will, He knew he was not creating a puppet from whom He should expect total obedience.
There is a subtext, a subtlety, in the Bible that suggests that God expects more from his creation than simply a robot-like following of orders. Yes, the orders are there, but even when they are not obeyed, there is no swift and unalterable punishment that follows the breaking of the rules.
Genesis 2:17, "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die. ... ā
Some translations say āā¦on that dayā¦ā but it didnāt happen. Of course, mortality replaced immortality for the couple, but it appears that God understood the key element he had introduced into his creations: free will.
So, if mankind is blessed with free will, making decisions as to what one should do requires knowledgeā¦.hence, letting the couple slide for eating from the tree of knowledge.
Good news for those of us who donāt always toe the line.
There is a subtext, a subtlety, in the Bible that suggests that God expects more from his creation than simply a robot-like following of orders. Yes, the orders are there, but even when they are not obeyed, there is no swift and unalterable punishment that follows the breaking of the rules.
Genesis 2:17, "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die. ... ā
Some translations say āā¦on that dayā¦ā but it didnāt happen. Of course, mortality replaced immortality for the couple, but it appears that God understood the key element he had introduced into his creations: free will.
So, if mankind is blessed with free will, making decisions as to what one should do requires knowledgeā¦.hence, letting the couple slide for eating from the tree of knowledge.
Good news for those of us who donāt always toe the line.