And I guess you never asked yourself why Bolton said nothing about this until he wrote a book, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
It was bigotry and racism that fueled the right to try and disqualify Obama as not being Constitutionally eligible to be president.
What about it, Fruitcake?It was bigotry and racism that fueled the right to try and disqualify Obama as not being Constitutionally eligible to be president.
USMB definition ALERT
"bigotry and racism" = noticing the following
What about it, Fruitcake?
Lying Fruitcake, what yearbook??What about it, Fruitcake?
It is YOUR definition.
Reading what Obama wrote in her yearbook = racist
LOLHarvard Law Review yearbook I believe....
LOLHarvard Law Review yearbook I believe....
Post it, cause I say you're full of shit.
I see, so the President now has NO confidentiality in discussions with his advisers....Is that now for all going forward, or just THIS President?Bolton wasn't in on the call.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
There’s much more to this than the phone call. Bolton was in on many things.
LOLLOLHarvard Law Review yearbook I believe....
Post it, cause I say you're full of shit.
Letter: Obama’s words may have created birther movement – Chico Enterprise-Record
I have no means to prove or disprove Obama was born in Hawaii. I do believe Obama himself planted the seeds of the “birther” movement.
Fact: In 1990 Obama was elected the first black president of the Harvard Law Review, a student publication featuring analysis of important legal matters. The review’s student yearbook includes a biography of Obama, stating “born in Kenya, raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”
Someone is full of shit. As usual, it is you....
Not from his yearbook, ya flamin' lunatic.So, Faun, what is this from???
And Obama didn't write that, his publisher did.
Fruitcake, you said it was in his yearbook. Now you see it was actually a mistake made by his publisher, during their research into Obsma to promote him. His own publisher said they made the mistake and that almost none of their clients wrote their own bio's.And Obama didn't write that, his publisher did.
LMFAO!!!
His "publisher" made it up!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fruitcake, you said it was in his yearbook.
Now you see it was actually a mistake made by his publisher,
Your link was to an opinion piece that claimed it without providing any evidence. You couldn't post a link to Obama's actual yearbook because it doesn't actually state what you claim.Fruitcake, you said it was in his yearbook.
No, I QUOTED THAT with link....
Now you see it was actually a mistake made by his publisher,
Nobody with an IQ over 4 would believe that BULLSHIT.
Obama wrote that, and then hit it.....
FALSE! Your side of the aisle supports Affirmative Action. America's #1 and largest racism.Oh, please.There may have been people on the right that did not like Obama. But they were afraid. For obvious reasons. You saw the riots from the antifa communist groups and african americans as the whole system was corrupted with anarchists and pure progs put into top positions. No one tried to stop them. I told you before. You are the consolation prize. Death, destruction and carnage is a great vengeance and vendetta to people who ph uk with others. America had a good run. We are now on fumes with a tattered constitution. And the current president standing in the way of the route to total meltdown.Grow a pair. The right was trying to disqualify Obama from before he was president, up until he left office.Its just that we don't care. A political body that has lied to us for years and decades. Calls to impeach a man long before the election. Sounds more like a Communist ploy against an arch rival running against a corrupted and sour smelling system.There was a fundamental difference between the two Impeachments. With Clinton, the investigation was done in private by an Independent Counsel for a year. All depositions and evidence gathering were done in secret before the Congress ever got involved. Whereas with Impeached Trump, that was done by the House inquiry where the right screeched how unfair it was and even stormed their hearing with proverbial torches and pitchforks.Sure, but had they followed Bubba's impeachment trial example and had closed door testimony and only presented excerpts as testimony, would you have been appeased and not carried on about "No witnesses, no witnesses!"? Not likely.
Few people ever heard of Antifa in the U.S. before Impeached Trump. It was bigotry and racism that fueled the right to try and disqualify Obama as not being Constitutionally eligible to be president. Just look at this site. I myopic viewpoint where nearly all of the unabashed racists are on your side of the aisle.
As said, anybody can drum up a few protestors. They mean nothing. Nor does it matter if Shokin is corrupt or not.LOLOL. Anybody can drum up a bunch of protestors about anything, anybody, anytime. You insult the intelligence of everyone on this board.Slobbers a senile old coot.
Here are just a few of the Ukrainians who threatened to remove their president at tbd time unless he got rid of Shokin, because he was corrupt...
Elected on a promise to reform Ukraine and fight corruption, reformers now fear Poroshenko has gone off course. The current imbroglio centers on Shokin, a Poroshenko ally and protector of the country’s corrupt old guard. Ukrainian reformers, including prominent civil society organizations and more than 100 members of the Verkhovna Rada, have demanded that Poroshenko fire Shokin—a request Poroshenko has ignored.
Their protests show Shokin was corrupt. And it wasn't just them. The rada wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. About 6 months later, with Poroshenko not getting rid of Shokin, Biden finished the job.
You don't understand English. Doesn't matter who that prosecutor was. Biden proved his malice, but he's finished anyway.LOLOL"Corrupt", by investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma ?Y’all love your corrupt prosecutors don’t ya.
As for Biden's corruption, it wouldn't matter who the prosecutor was. the mere fact that he demanded something from somebody under a threat is HIS corruption, which he publicized.
Gramps, the corrupt prosecutor he's talking about is Shokin.