🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

His testimony is tainted because he is a disgruntled former employee. DUH!
If that’s the best you can do, so be it. It’s incredibly weak. If he’s disgruntled, it’s because Trump isn’t fit for office.

That's your opinion and just like your asshole, it stinks!

That stink is your own desperation. It’s getting harder and harder to ignore Trump’s corruption.

What corruption? Asking a country to investigate corruption is corruption? Only in libtard world!
Every American is protected from baseless government investigation.

Trump is violating that protection.
Trump is Violating You and we are ok with that.
You are ok with that.
You like it.

The Trolling Trump Thread will continue to be a Trolling Trump Thread that belongs in Conspiracy Theories or Flame Zone but will stay here until The Mods Decide that they have had enough of Trump Trollers, Trolling The Trolling Trump Thread and Trolling Trump with Trolls.
 
An unpublished manuscript supposedly someone got a copy of...
I also noticed that none of the stories stated the manuscript actually said that. Only equivocation of what it could say. Read the reports yourself and see where they state what they actually are saying came from it or that they have read it.
They don’t. Reminds me of Schiff's facade of what he said the call transcript said. And it started with the NYT’s.
 
That doesn't mean he's not a first hand witness. You're truly fucking brain-dead. :cuckoo:
And yet Democrats refused to subpoena him.

Gee.. Wonder why...
Because he threatened to engage in a lengthy court battle which might preclude his testimony at trial. It’s. It a mystery.

That does not excuse the fact that he was not subpoenaed.
There were many, many subpoenas issues. Every one was ignored. It changes nothing.

The House refused to follow precedent and take the Executive Branch to court to enforce their subpoena. Failing to do that means they do not get the right to whine.
Trump refuses to follow precedent by refusing to acknowledge Congress’s power to subpoena records and investigate the executive branch.

So they impeached him instead. Failing to follow precedent means you don’t get to whine about it.
 
It's whatever the House says it is. In this case, they say it was using the power of his office for personal gain.
But that's a lie.

Just ask the Ukrainian President.

The House has the authority to impeach based on a lie. That point of yours is correct
It's not a lie, Impeached Trump admitted he asked a foreign national to investigate a political rival...

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "

So political rivals are now immune from investigation? Every white collar criminal will be running for president every year so they can gain that immunity.

Didn’t you guys spend years complaining that Trump’s campaign was investigated?

It was your side that claimed rivals are immune from investigation.

Making shit up doesn't validate your lies, dumbass!
Making shit up? Trump complained quite a lot about being investigated. So did his supporters. Were you in a cave?
 
There’s a discrepancy as to whether he was fired or resigned. But let’s say he was fired. How does that mean he wasn’t a firsthand witness?

His testimony is tainted because he is a disgruntled former employee. DUH!
If that’s the best you can do, so be it. It’s incredibly weak. If he’s disgruntled, it’s because Trump isn’t fit for office.

That's your opinion and just like your asshole, it stinks!

That stink is your own desperation. It’s getting harder and harder to ignore Trump’s corruption.

What corruption? Asking a country to investigate corruption is corruption? Only in libtard world!
Impeached Trump didn't ask Zelensky to look into actual corruption in terms of Biden. Impeached Trump invented corruption and asked Zelensky to look into his invented corruption. Impeached Trump asked Zelensky to look into Biden stopping the prosecution of his son's company, Burisma... but there was no ongoing prosecution of Burisma when Biden got Shokin thrown out...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.
 
They ca
Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says

John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation

How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.

The times has no credible reporters.
How can they vote no?
Easy.....they simply write in N....O......

Jo
 
Let's look at this foreign aid as a performance bonus. Trump wanted corruption by American politically connected people to be investigated. Trump can't have connected Americans shaking down foreign governments. That reflects poorly on us as a country. The problem here is that Democrats still don't think this Biden shakedown is important. They think we should allow certain people to do whatever they want. Dems are hypocrites who can't be trusted
 
His testimony is tainted because he is a disgruntled former employee. DUH!
If that’s the best you can do, so be it. It’s incredibly weak. If he’s disgruntled, it’s because Trump isn’t fit for office.

That's your opinion and just like your asshole, it stinks!

That stink is your own desperation. It’s getting harder and harder to ignore Trump’s corruption.

What corruption? Asking a country to investigate corruption is corruption? Only in libtard world!
Impeached Trump didn't ask Zelensky to look into actual corruption in terms of Biden. Impeached Trump invented corruption and asked Zelensky to look into his invented corruption. Impeached Trump asked Zelensky to look into Biden stopping the prosecution of his son's company, Burisma... but there was no ongoing prosecution of Burisma when Biden got Shokin thrown out...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.

He even lied about Biden to Zelensky saying that Biden went around bragging about shutting down the investigation.
 
If that’s the best you can do, so be it. It’s incredibly weak. If he’s disgruntled, it’s because Trump isn’t fit for office.

That's your opinion and just like your asshole, it stinks!

That stink is your own desperation. It’s getting harder and harder to ignore Trump’s corruption.

What corruption? Asking a country to investigate corruption is corruption? Only in libtard world!
Impeached Trump didn't ask Zelensky to look into actual corruption in terms of Biden. Impeached Trump invented corruption and asked Zelensky to look into his invented corruption. Impeached Trump asked Zelensky to look into Biden stopping the prosecution of his son's company, Burisma... but there was no ongoing prosecution of Burisma when Biden got Shokin thrown out...

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

[...]

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.

[...]

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.

He even lied about Biden to Zelensky saying that Biden went around bragging about shutting down the investigation.
Wouldn't America like to know why Obama spent so much money in The Ukraine to stop an Anti Corruption Government from being elected?

Wouldn't America like to know how The State Department laundered $7 Billion through the Ukraine Embassy during the Ukraine elections and The Ukraine Embassy nor The State Department can account for where it went?


I bet they'd also like to know why The Ukraine Embassy was working with The Clinton Campaign & Obama on this, and why John Brennan, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Manafort, Gage and Podesta worked on stopping The Anti Corruption Government from being elected in the Ukraine.

Wouldn't America want to know why James Comey and Bob Mueller gave Blanket Immunity to The Clinton Campaign and The Entire Podesta Group and No one Else during their investigations? And wouldn't America want to know why Obama sealed all such related records to his activities and those of his staff in The Ukraine by exerting Executive Privilege?


They would probably also like to know why Obama ordered Joe Biden to extort Ukraine to get The Ukraine Prosecutor fired, before he could uncover a money laundering and bribery scheme at Burisma which lead right back to Vladimir Putin.

Don't you now want to know why Joe Biden says he is refusing to testify even if subpoenaed, and why Hunter Biden is being Ordered to Appear in Front of a Judge to answer for his Refusing to Comply with Court Orders to Submit his Financial Records in his child support case? Especially since Hunter is refusing to turn over records of his Burisma income?

Nah, Nothing Fishy There.....AT ALL.
 
Bolton would need something on hard-copy to prove he just wasn't saying that Trump knew, and then, what if all this is true? It still means nothing!

Goalposts are moving. First you wanted firsthand witnesses. Now you’re demanding documentary evidence. Nothing will ever satisfy the true Trump believers.

If it’s all true, then it contradicts something that the Trump defense has been working very hard to convince us of. Wouldn’t you wonder why Trump was trying to sell you on a lie that didn’t even matter?

Bolton is not a firsthand witness either as he was FIRED by Trump. If Trump actually did anything that Bolton didn't like, why didn't Bolton appear before the House impeachment inquiry?

There’s a discrepancy as to whether he was fired or resigned. But let’s say he was fired. How does that mean he wasn’t a firsthand witness?

His testimony is tainted because he is a disgruntled former employee. DUH!
If that’s the best you can do, so be it. It’s incredibly weak. If he’s disgruntled, it’s because Trump isn’t fit for office.
No it doesn’t. Bolton is a much bigger asshole than Donnie. He’s a fucking neocon. Nothing more needs be said, to describe how despicable he is.
 
The articles don't list a crime or impeachable wrongdoing.

Just 2 vague whines.
Dumbfuck, abuse of power is an impeachable offense. The House drafted an article of impeachment on abuse of power against Nixon and Clinton as well.

Where does one find the definition of abuse of power? Your imagination and those of the libtards does not count.
It's whatever the House says it is. In this case, they say it was using the power of his office for personal gain.

What personal gain would that be? You don't have an answer so don't try that "dirt on a political opponent" bullshit! It doesn't fly with anyone above a room temp IQ.
LOLOL

So you want me to answer but you don't want to hear the answer.
1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
He does that a lot.
 
The Bolton BOMBSHELL is that Trump wanted to make the last piece of the aid contingent on the Ukrainians cooperation on the Biden investigation.

How's that again?

History records that, (a) the Ukrainians got all the aid, and (b) they never made a public announcement about an investigation or, as far as we know, conducted an investigation into the Bidens' shenanigans.

So let me get this straight: The Democrats now DEMAND that Bolton be compelled to testify to something that we KNOW FOR A FACT DID NOT HAPPEN!!!

And the Media are taking it seriously.

All you need to know.
 
The Bolton BOMBSHELL is that Trump wanted to make the last piece of the aid contingent on the Ukrainians cooperation on the Biden investigation.

How's that again?

History records that, (a) the Ukrainians got all the aid, and (b) they never made a public announcement about an investigation or, as far as we know, conducted an investigation into the Bidens' shenanigans.

So let me get this straight: The Democrats now DEMAND that Bolton be compelled to testify to something that we KNOW FOR A FACT DID NOT HAPPEN!!!

And the Media are taking it seriously.

All you need to know.
There's already a thread on this....

The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)
 
Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens,

An investigation into Democrats involved in corruption with the former Ukraine government perhaps, for which Biden would have no immunity. Good way to check the integrity of the new Ukrainian government.

Hardly. Investigating Russian propaganda and lies will do nothing to prove Ukrainian integrity.
 
Apparently this information was provided to both The Washington Post and The New York Times.
They're deep state same as Bolton.
God you're clueless.:71:


OMG, how many times are you people going to contort yourself into the next pretzel shape for this lying POS douchebag in the OO?
Bolton WAS APPOINTED BY TRUMP you fucking idiot.

And he's been waiting for this moment. Even Rupert Murdoch smells trouble:
Bolton Claim Set to Scramble Impeachment Proceedings
 
Apparently this information was provided to both The Washington Post and The New York Times.
They're deep state same as Bolton.
God you're clueless.:71:


OMG, how many times are you people going to contort yourself into the next pretzel shape for this lying POS douchebag in the OO?
Bolton WAS APPOINTED BY TRUMP you fucking idiot.

And he's been waiting for this moment. Even Rupert Murdoch smells trouble:
Bolton Claim Set to Scramble Impeachment Proceedings
How many people in the White House were actually appointed by Trump, other than as a formality for the benefit of an uneducated public, genius ?
I can't wait to hear this.
Ukraine_sham-34-725x529.jpg
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top