Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
If that's what the current standing treaty says...and it hasn't been legally cancelled...then they should.Show us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
So you think the Sioux own half of South Dakota? Is that you claim?
No, they don't. The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants. It has done so many times. That's the fundamental law of treaties: they are valid only so long as both sides observe them.Ah...so you don't think that treaties hold any weight legally.Actually, it is....in a treaty that has never been revoked or altered.Not surprised that you support fascist thugs in uniforms.Cant wait for the water cannons when the temps really drop.
In the mean time they can amuse me with the rubber bullet damage photos.
Maybe if they weren't protesting about a pipe line thats not even on their property.
There are thousands of such treaties. When the courts recognize them, let us know.
No, they don't. The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants. It has done so many times. That's the fundamental law of treaties: they are valid only so long as both sides observe them.Ah...so you don't think that treaties hold any weight legally.Actually, it is....in a treaty that has never been revoked or altered.Not surprised that you support fascist thugs in uniforms.
Maybe if they weren't protesting about a pipe line thats not even on their property.
There are thousands of such treaties. When the courts recognize them, let us know.
If that's what the current standing treaty says...and it hasn't been legally cancelled...then they should.Show us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
So you think the Sioux own half of South Dakota? Is that you claim?
If it's not legal, then why don't the courts enforce the treaties the federal government made with the Indians?No, they don't. The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants. It has done so many times. That's the fundamental law of treaties: they are valid only so long as both sides observe them.Ah...so you don't think that treaties hold any weight legally.Actually, it is....in a treaty that has never been revoked or altered.Maybe if they weren't protesting about a pipe line thats not even on their property.
There are thousands of such treaties. When the courts recognize them, let us know.
Look at this, will you? "The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants"....doesn't make it right or legal.
Show us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
You all best get the fuck out of our way.....
It's 100% legal. Whether it's "right" is a matter only history can settle.No, they don't. The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants. It has done so many times. That's the fundamental law of treaties: they are valid only so long as both sides observe them.Ah...so you don't think that treaties hold any weight legally.Actually, it is....in a treaty that has never been revoked or altered.Maybe if they weren't protesting about a pipe line thats not even on their property.
There are thousands of such treaties. When the courts recognize them, let us know.
Look at this, will you? "The U.S. government can break a treaty any time it wants"....doesn't make it right or legal.
Obviously you know nothing of real Indian life, no real Indian thinks any land is his. LolShow us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
Obviously you know nothing of real Indian life, no real Indian thinks any land is his. LolShow us the changes to the Ft Laramie treaty that changes what is their land.Golly gee...I see "Unceded Sioux Territory under 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie.....hmmmmmmmmmm
there you have it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's not their land,get over it.
God bless these people for being so brave and strong.
The original real Americans.
Lying little bitch you are. I personally know better. Many are my wife's cousins. And many of the protesters are indigenous people from other nations, as well as from the many tribes here in the US. And there are many citizens of the US who are not native Americans,but realize that it could be their water at risk.Why am I not surprised to see the Alt-Right (WSs) against the protests.
Bod the protestors are not even Standing Rock
