bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
- 2,180
Oh puhleeze. Try to address the issues I bring up rather than engaging in these idiotic personal attacks.I have studied it.......The story of the theory of continental proves you are wrong, moron.You claim I don't understand what it means? Prove it. Otherwise, shut your fucking yap.How am I misusing it?Appeal to authority....
I've aleady [sic] explained my positiion [sic] of the court. .......
What are your qualifications in Constitutional Law? We know you can barely string together a sentence in English.
Next!
You should learn what that means before repeating it again, dumbass.
You clearly don't understand what it means. Why don't you Google, or Wiki, or whatever you ignorant fools do when you're confused?
You can't even understand the Wiki page about it? That's pretty fucking sad.
Referring to an authority on a subject is not a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority on one subject to 'prove' something about an unrelated subject is a fallacy, idiot. Referring to an authority that does not address the specific issue at hand can be a fallacy, idiot. Referring to a very elite authority on a very specific topic in regards to that specific topic is not a fallacy, idiot.
Have you ever studied logic at any level?
Look brainless, if you really want to talk about logic, why not take the time to actually study it at least a little?
Where? At what level? How?
You're full of shit, and you know it.