The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again

It’s still rightfully seen as election meddling and will make a lot of people angry

They’re playing with fire

Seems you're already abandoning your claim that it was disenfranchisement.
 
'Engaged' in an insurrection, ok.

Isn't that a violation of US Code?
Why don’t you tell the state Supreme Court how wrong they are. Next you’ll be doing something delusional like denying climate change, thinking trickle down works and supporting Trump.
 
Your hero shits in his pants wears diapers . but take so little care of it that he smells like a cesspool, Gags everyone around him but still thinks he is a god. Diaper Don , Diaper dells hero and God. You can't make this stuff up.

Adderall has side effects.

 
Why don’t you tell the state Supreme Court how wrong they are. Next you’ll be doing something delusional like denying climate change, thinking trickle down works and supporting Trump.
I believe one of the democrat dissenting judges did....try to keep up.
 

Care to try again?

"We conclude that because President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list President Trump as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot," the court's majority wrote in an unsigned opinion. "Therefore, the Secretary may not list President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, nor may she count any write-in votes cast for him."

Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is disqualified from presidency for Jan. 6 riot

Shit-fuck moment, dude.....
 
Last edited:
I believe one of the democrat dissenting judges did....try to keep up.
What kind of slime supports a guy who shits in his pants and stinks so bad that people actually have puked around him . This question is for Diaper Dell because we think he also shits in his pants and gags everyone on these forums. So tell us Diaper Dell whats going on with you.
 
They’re certainly trying to make it more difficult for people to vote for Trump
No one should be able to vote for Diaper Don , he is a traitor to this country , Why do you think it is Ok to have a traitor to this country as a candidate.
 
There is only one question to be asked now in all these political forums and that is why would anyone vote for someone who shits in his pants all day long . Because he take to many Drugs, Drug addict is what they are saying now .
 
If you insist you're not lying then you're simply illiterate. You literally shifted the operative phrase subjected to "shall" from "have to power to," to, "enforce."

Those two sentences do not mean the same thing.

One means Congress has to enforce it, the other means Congress doesn't have to enforce it.

As far as whether or not states can enforce it, YOU already supplied the answer to that when YOU pointed out states can't impeach a president because the Constitution declares the House shall have "SOLE" power to impeach; while the 14th Amendment does NOT include such a limitation.

I didn’t shift any meaning. Everything I said was the same thing. You are splitting hairs about the full wording, but in every statement, I meant the same thing, what I said meant the same thing. “Shall enforce” and “shall have the power to enforce” mean the exact same thing.

The word “sole” not being in the section 5 doesn’t change anything. There are many places where the word “sole” is not listed in the cotus. In that example, they are pointing specifically to the house, saying the house has the sole power to impeach, in section 5, it says “congress” must pass legislation. That could be either the house or senate or both.

You should really consider the word “shall”…it’s used a lot in the cotus, to declare powers that Congress must do, and to declare what rights are protected. Are you really going to say “shall” means “may”? That changes a lot of stuff in the cotus.


When it says “Congress shall have the power to enforce…” that is declaring a directive power and action. It is assigning responsibility to Congress…that what “shall” means.
 
yes, it is a job. They are hired and fired like anyother job.

No sane person complains that people with a background of accused domestic and child abuse can’t get certain types of jobs. Aamof, they support it. You’re whining that Trump hasn’t had due process. He’s having it now.
listen to his rhetoric. The court acts on evidence of past and future behavior. He’s done and said everything to support continued quest to being a dictator. The mfker admits it. It’s like a priest admitting he would be a child molester.

Do you call it a just response for some one who admits to being a child molester and will continue to be be a child molester from not hiring them as a school bus driver !

Child molestation has criminal penalties for it, yet we allow hiring constrictions just on the evidentiary suspicion he’ll repeat his conduct by a COURT to that end.

Trump has already announced that his oath means nothing and through his attorneys, that’s his defense….he has through his attorneys announced that anything he says under oath means nothing. Now he’s running around promoting fascism and dictatorship which you bozos WANT…WTF ?

What in the heck are you talking about?
If someone is charged with child molestation, yes, we put restrictions on them. But that’s the point….trumo hasn’t been charged with insurrection. I’ve been saying this all along.
 
What kind of slime supports a guy who shits in his pants and stinks so bad that people actually have puked around him . This question is for Diaper Dell because we think he also shits in his pants and gags everyone on these forums. So tell us Diaper Dell whats going on with you.
End stage TDS right here folks.
  1. “In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect’s every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world.”
  2. “The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim’s vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of hyperbole.”
  3. “As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality.”
 
The key point is it's a federal felony. How many were charged with video evidence that same day for breaching and/or entering the capitol. Something like 40,000 videos, but it seems not one has been found of Trump that day committing insurrection that proves He broke federal law.

Not one charge.
He’s on trial for breaking federal law
I'll be damned......maybe because He had no interest in law school.
Trump only had interest in breaking the law and not being held accountable. hes managed to stay out of jail
What in the heck are you talking about?
If someone is charged with child molestation, yes, we put restrictions on them. But that’s the point….trumo hasn’t been charged with insurrection. I’ve been saying this all along.
Ah, yes he has. He’s do to go on trial for it….illiterate.

Now, here is your education.
 
He’s on trial for breaking federal law
Your point, so are democrats.
Trump only had interest in breaking the law and not being held accountable. hes managed to stay out of jail
Lame answer for some clown claiming He couldn't get into law school when Biden was 2nd in his class.
Ah, yes he has. He’s do to go on trial for it….illiterate.
Duh......clownman...........your article precedes Trump winning an appeal before SCOTUS which has nullified Chutkan's trial, for the moment.
 
Your point, so are democrats.

Lame answer for some clown claiming He couldn't get into law school when Biden was 2nd in his class.

Duh......clownman...........your article precedes Trump winning an appeal before SCOTUS which has nullified Chutkan's trial, for the moment.
Is this what stupid looks and feels like to a Humper ? None of the trials have been “ nullified” for the moment. Geesus, you don’t even know what “ nullified” means do you ? Do you just go through life making up your own meanings to normally used words ? Guess you do.
 
You are saying that, even though insurrection is a criminal statute, we don’t have to assign all of the penalties prescribed by the criminal code…if that the case, why do we have to assign any penalties? Why not just throw the code out and just kind do whatever we want.
There is a reason, even though they've filed over 3,000 charges with respect to January 6th, the Biden DOJ has not charged a single person with insurrection. More germane, Comrade Smith has not charged President Trump with insurrection.
 

Forum List

Back
Top