The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again

[miketx]

Trump ceased trying to overturn the election results when the last court case failed.

That’s when he tried to overthrow the government.

You are a poor liar

 

[miketx]

The guys who bought the Supreme Court are no friends of Donald Trump and no they don’t like he chaos he sews.

Please note that Trump hasn’t won hardly any cases in front of this SC.

What chaos liar?

 

[Dragonlady]

Yes, a government can be overthrown.
No, Trump did not attempt to overthrow the government.
Neither did the J6 protestors.

Your denials are worthless. The law, the Courts, and the American people, say otherwise.

 

[Orangecat]

Your denials are worthless. The law, the Courts, and the American people, say otherwise.

Lol. Canada Karen thinks she has a say in US politics.
What a sad and pathetic life you must lead.
The cats are hungry, hop to it.

 

[Nostra]

Trump ceased trying to overturn the election results when the last court case failed.

That’s when he tried to overthrow the government.

He tried to overthrow the government by telling people at a speech to "peacefully and patriotically let your voices be heard?

What a dumbass you are.

 

[Nostra]

Your denials are worthless. The law, the Courts, and the American people, say otherwise.

What court ruled Trump tried to overthrow the government?

What law was Trump charged with regarding overthrowing the government?

What American people say he tried to overthrow the government besides leftists idiots?

 

[toobfreak]

Fat chance, getting that through their courts, but have fun! Sucker.

Hey, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Just remember that when the SCOTUS punts Colorado back to them and tells them sorry but no cigar.

 

[White 6]

Hey, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Just remember that when the SCOTUS punts Colorado back to them and tells them sorry but no cigar.

They might.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You know what I find interesting.

-Trump can argue more than 60 times in court that the election was stolen from him. That's alright.

-Those lawsuits can be lost, his lawyers sanctioned for arguing them, some of them being disbarred in the process. And that's alright.

-Then despite him having lost those lawsuits he can still argue all those judges were wrong. And that's alright.

-Then he can demand the DOJ lie to the states about the findings of the investigations done by them. Something he thinks better off after these officials threaten to quit. And that's alright.

- After that he can come up with an unsupported assertion that the Vice-president has the right to ignore the certified election results if he so chooses. And that's alright.

-Then when he refuses to do that he can try to pressure him by asking his supporters to go to the Capitol and that's alright.

Of course he can't be held responsible for those supporters breaking into the Capitol as a result.



Yet the only way "highly credentialed lawyers and judges" can decide that Trump is an insurrectionist, and insurrectionist are barred from running for president is 'hate'.

Trump can argue more than 60 times in court that the election was stolen from him. That's alright.

I thought those lawsuits were not from trump but other people…trump didn’t lose 60 times, some other people who brought lawsuits lost 60 times. Am I mistaken about this?

After that he can come up with an unsupported assertion that the Vice-president has the right to ignore the certified election results if he so chooses. And that's alright.

Well, he didnt really ask him to ignore the results. He was challenging the results and asked pence to send them back to the states to recount and re-verify. Is that wrong to do?

Then when he refuses to do that he can try to pressure him by asking his supporters to go to the Capitol and that's alright.

Sure, to peacefully cheer on the senators and vp..again, is this wrong?

Yet the only way "highly credentialed lawyers and judges" can decide that Trump is an insurrectionist, and insurrectionist are barred from running for president is 'hate'.

Correct, because they are simply following the left wing narrative, calling for the disqual of someone who didn’t commit or support or incite an ACTUAL insurrection, hasn’t been charged or convicted of insurrection, all because they don’t want trump to be president.

I call that a hate based decision.

 

[Dragonlady]

I thought those lawsuits were not from trump but other people…trump didn’t lose 60 times, some other people who brought lawsuits lost 60 times. Am I mistaken about this?



Well, he didnt really ask him to ignore the results. He was challenging the results and asked pence to send them back to the states to recount and re-verify. Is that wrong to do?



Sure, to peacefully cheer on the senators and vp..again, is this wrong?



Correct, because they are simply following the left wing narrative, calling for the disqual of someone who didn’t commit or support or incite an ACTUAL insurrection, hasn’t been charged or convicted of insurrection, all because they don’t want trump to be president.

I call that a hate based decision.

Your post makes so many assumptions which are simply not in evidence, while completely ignoring the entire transcript of Trump's speech, and the months of careful planning that preceded it starting with the appointment of Kash Patel, and his buddies to key positions at the Pentagon, right after the election was called for Biden.

No, Mike Pence had no right to send the votes back to the states for a recount. Absolutely no right whatsoever. Whoever told you that was LYING.

 

[Nostra]

Your post makes so many assumptions which are simply not in evidence, while completely ignoring the entire transcript of Trump's speech, and the months of careful planning that preceded it starting with the appointment of Kash Patel, and his buddies to key positions at the Pentagon, right after the election was called for Biden.

No, Mike Pence had no right to send the votes back to the states for a recount. Absolutely no right whatsoever. Whoever told you that was LYING.

"Peacefully and Patriotically let your voices be heard"-President Donald J Trump, Jan 6, 2021,

Next?

 

[Kondor3]

Not quite true.

The SCOTUS could rule that the President does not fall under the "any officer, civil or military" provision making the "engaged in insurrection" provision irrelevant.

Such a ruling would bypass any need to rule on insurrection as that become a moot point since it wouldn't apply.

WW

It's a very sad day when a former President of the United States has to rely upon such "technicalities" as an escape hatch.

It's what happens when a sitting President summons, incites and aims a riotous mob to assault the United States Congress.

With any luck SCOTUS will set aside such arguments and move onto the main course - the question of Insurrection.

 

[miketx]

It's a very sad day when a former President of the United States has to rely upon such "technicalities" as an escape hatch.

It's what happens when a sitting President summons, incites and aims a riotous mob to assault the United States Congress.

With any luck SCOTUS will set aside such arguments and move onto the main course - the question of Insurrection.

Stop lying traitor.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Your post makes so many assumptions which are simply not in evidence, while completely ignoring the entire transcript of Trump's speech, and the months of careful planning that preceded it starting with the appointment of Kash Patel, and his buddies to key positions at the Pentagon, right after the election was called for Biden.

No, Mike Pence had no right to send the votes back to the states for a recount. Absolutely no right whatsoever. Whoever told you that was LYING.

Ok, if all that is true, why are they reluctant to charge him with insurrection?

Again, nothing in trumps speech was insurrection, no actual insurrection took place that day, he didn’t order an attack on the capitol and he didn’t try to arbitrarily submit “his own” electors. He wanted pence to send them back to the states to recount. Is that not a power the vp has? A president can’t contest an election?

 

[Kondor3]

I will accept their ruling. So will you.
did you get that attitude from taking a "how to be a submissive person" class?.....or was it the "principals of being a good dictator" class? .....

No. I got that attitude from taking American Civics classes in school. An exercise apparently and entirely lost upon you.

 

[Kondor3]

He wouldn't have made it this far if his party hadn't cheated in the tens of millions column.

Oh, hor$e$hit.

You a$$hole$ had sixty-two (62) chances in the law courts.

Many of those in front of Republican (and even Trump-appointed) judges and justices.

In most cases you got laughed out of court because you didn't have jack-$hit to serve-up as reliable evidence.

You lost.

Bigly.

So did your Orange Baboon-God.

 

[lantern2814]

Your denials are worthless. The law, the Courts, and the American people, say otherwise.

Where are the insurrection convictions you idiot Canuck? The American people are saying they want Trump over Xiden.

 

[Kondor3]

I see you're wanting us to be a third world shithole. I guess it would be okay for the SCOTUS to rule that Biden is a traitor and be arrested.

Were we a third-world $hithole when the 14th was applied to Insurrectionists in the 1860s and 70s? No. Same now. No Sale.

 

[Kondor3]

Stop lying traitor.

Lying about what, my angry little internet princess? Where in that 3 or 4 -line post was I lying?

 

[miketx]

Lying about what, my angry little internet princess? Where in that 3 or 4 -line post was I lying?

Everything out of your holster.