Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
An inadequate and vague response lacking substance. Just like your sixty-two complaints in the law courts in 2020. Lightweight.Everything out of your holster.
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An inadequate and vague response lacking substance. Just like your sixty-two complaints in the law courts in 2020. Lightweight.Everything out of your holster.
Anything the SC decides that invalidates it immediately makes Biden kingThis will not hold up…
If you insist on making sense, our liberals will be frothing — more than they already are.Trump HAS to be charged under 2383 to be disqualified, here’s why.
as far as I’m aware, there are only 2 statutes that can disqualify a president…treason and insurrection.
Section 5 of the 14th amendment says that Congress has to enforce the 14th amendment by appropriate legislation. This means CONGRESS are the ones who enforce it. They did this by passing 18 US 2383. 2383 says the penalties for being involved with an insurrection are a fine, or imprisonment, or both, AND disqualification from office. Because fines and imprisonment are involved, it makes it a criminal statute, and since you can’t send someone to prison without due process, a charge and conviction in a federal court MUST happen in order to disqualify him from the ballot.
Fortunately for me...Stop lying. traitor.
you got that attitude because you fall into line when they tell you too....nice and compliant.....No. I got that attitude from taking American Civics classes in school. An exercise apparently and entirely lost upon you.
Nonsense. I was raised to respect the Rule of Law rather than your Cult of Personality. SCOTUS is the highest legal arbiter.you got that attitude because you fall into line when they tell you too....nice and compliant.....
who the fuck is my orange baboon god?....geezus christ dipshit say the assholes name....or did your gods tell you you couldnt?...yep nice and compliant....Nonsense. I was raised to respect the Rule of Law rather than your Cult of Personality. SCOTUS is the highest legal arbiter.
Do you think your Orange Baboon-God is above The Law?
Do you think your Orange Baboon-God is the highest legal arbiter?
Befehl ist befehl, eh, Hermann?
Only in your dreamsJ. Michael Luttig is a former federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Laurence H. Tribe is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor of Constitutional Law Emeritus at Harvard University.
The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.
As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.
This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.
The historically unprecedented federal and state indictments of former President Donald Trump have prompted many to ask whether his conviction pursuant to any or all of these indictments would be either necessary or sufficient to deny him the office of the presidency in 2024.
Trump Is Constitutionally Prohibited From the Presidency
I agree with Luttig and Tribe. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution seem clear to me! What will SCOTUS do? What do you think?
Link us up to the civil code that deals with insurrection, Simp.
Link us up to his charges for insurrection, Vermin.
J. Michael Luttig is a former federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Laurence H. Tribe is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor of Constitutional Law Emeritus at Harvard University.
The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.
As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.
This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.
The historically unprecedented federal and state indictments of former President Donald Trump have prompted many to ask whether his conviction pursuant to any or all of these indictments would be either necessary or sufficient to deny him the office of the presidency in 2024.
Trump Is Constitutionally Prohibited From the Presidency
I agree with Luttig and Tribe. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution seem clear to me! What will SCOTUS do? What do you think?