The Constitution says provide for the "General Welfare"

[EdwardBaiamonte]

But this does not mean, do anything it wants to provide for what it defines as the General Welfare. If it did mean that it could strike out the Bill of Rights or a branch of govt. Obviously, it means provide for the general welfare within the context of the Constitution.

 

[Kondor3]

Broad interpretation of "provide for the general walfare" = a Liberal perspective

Narrow interpretation of "provide for the general welfare" = a Conservative perspective

It's what's been Center Stage in the American Political Theater since the early 1930s and beyond.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Broad interpretation of "provide for the general walfare" = a Liberal perspective

Narrow interpretation of "provide for the general welfare" = a Conservative perspective

It's what's been Center Stage in the American Political Theater since the early 1930s and beyond.

dear its been at center stage since the 1930's about when treasonous liberals started spying for Stalin!!

 

[the_human_being]

But this does not mean, do anything it wants to provide for what it defines as the General Welfare. If it did mean that it could strike out the Bill of Rights or a branch of govt. Obviously, it means provide for the general welfare within the context of the Constitution.

That's what's going on now. The taxpayers are providing for the EBT, child day care, medical insurance subsidies, SSI, school lunches and the general WELFARE of a nation chock full of freeloaders.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

But this does not mean, do anything it wants to provide for what it defines as the General Welfare. If it did mean that it could strike out the Bill of Rights or a branch of govt. Obviously, it means provide for the general welfare within the context of the Constitution.

That's what's going on now. The taxpayers are providing for the EBT, child day care, medical insurance subsidies, SSI, school lunches and the general WELFARE of a nation chock full of freeloaders.

yes a nation chock full of liberal freeloaders!!

 

[Misty]

But this does not mean, do anything it wants to provide for what it defines as the General Welfare. If it did mean that it could strike out the Bill of Rights or a branch of govt. Obviously, it means provide for the general welfare within the context of the Constitution.

That's what's going on now. The taxpayers are providing for the EBT, child day care, medical insurance subsidies, SSI, school lunches and the general WELFARE of a nation chock full of freeloaders.

Yep. The general welfare is better than ever thanks to the American tax payer especially the 1%.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

But this does not mean, do anything it wants to provide for what it defines as the General Welfare. If it did mean that it could strike out the Bill of Rights or a branch of govt. Obviously, it means provide for the general welfare within the context of the Constitution.

That's what's going on now. The taxpayers are providing for the EBT, child day care, medical insurance subsidies, SSI, school lunches and the general WELFARE of a nation chock full of freeloaders.

Yep. The general welfare is better than ever thanks to the American tax payer especially the 1%.

but how much better can someone really be if he's on welfare?
Not only is he living on money from the top 1% but he's living on inventions from the top 1% without which he would be back in the stone age!!

and still the libcommies teach that the 1% are greedy freeloders