defend it?I’m not wearing my militant atheist watch so maybe it is.
Well, this thread seems to be bust for the atheists. Fort Fun's still barking at the moon about existence arising from nonexistence. Hollie and others won't answer my and ding's questions about statements they've made about omniscience, omnipotence and other things. Breeze is rattling his usual inscrutable, shape-shifting banalities. And G.T. can't/won't defend Morriston-Malpass' madness.
youre a real crackpot, eh? i dont need to defend it...the defense is in it. the paper malpass wrote, IS the defense.
The video explaina it completely, and your response was a missing of the actual point. a non sequitur.
THATS the very reason youre able to BELIEVE the Kalam.
Its completely ridiculous, and its mere assertions, and you cannot understand why. Thatssssss a you thing.