Bullshit.And there is the rub.
They are NOT teaching that
You've been given example after example, right here in this forum.
You're either a liar or you're terminally retarded. Which is it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit.And there is the rub.
They are NOT teaching that
And there is the rub.
They are NOT teaching that
And there is the rub.
They are NOT teaching that
These are facts. SO you point is that we should ban facts if they are uncomfortable?
What is it and what it is NOT. Pushing back against lunatics like Politicalchic is NOT teaching CRT in schools
OMG...we CAN'T have our kids learning TRUTHS like that
Again. Facts. You folks haATE FACTS
But thank Politicalchic for her usual "Gish Gallop"
These are facts. SO you point is that we should ban facts if they are uncomfortable?
What is it and what it is NOT. Pushing back against lunatics like Politicalchic is NOT teaching CRT in schools
OMG...we CAN'T have our kids learning TRUTHS like that
Again. Facts. You folks haATE FACTS
But thank Politicalchic for her usual "Gish Gallop"
I don’t oppose teaching actual history but CRT is not real history. CRT is trying to convince our kids today that they are racist because America is a racist nation. That is a blatant lie and is racist in itself.
Is exactly what the democrats had achieved at Twitter before Musk bought it. Now Biden responds with his own government approved censorship board in it's own law enforcement agency.These are facts. SO you point is that we should ban facts if they are uncomfortable?
Should it not be a case for the Supreme Court to decide whether a Democrat-led Administration can set up an agency to squash the free speech of private companies that don’t kowtow to the liberal propaganda?Is exactly what the democrats had achieved at Twitter before Musk bought it. Now Biden responds with his own government approved censorship board in it's own law enforcement agency.
It's an unproven theory.
Should it not be a case for the Supreme Court to decide whether a Democrat-led Administration can set up an agency to squash the free speech of private companies that don’t kowtow to the liberal propaganda?
It’s an extension of it. Government cannot punish people for expressing their opinions. If Dementia’s Censorship Agency interferes with how Musk is running his private company by blocking posts with messages it doesn't want known, and it is hurting his revenue stream via ad dollars, then he has a case.Only if it infacts the first amendment.
Should it not be a case for the Supreme Court to decide whether a Democrat-led Administration can set up an agency to squash the free speech of private companies that don’t kowtow to the liberal propaganda?
It’s an extension of it. Government cannot punish people for expressing their opinions. If Dementia’s Censorship Agency interferes with how Musk is running his private company by blocking posts with messages it doesn't want known, and it is hurting his revenue stream via ad dollars, then he has a case.
1619 Project Author Nikole Hannah-Jones Now Says She ...
https://reason.com › Media Criticism
— It's a provocative claim, and it came under serious criticism, along with other aspects of the project. But the project's lead author, Nikole ...
….and that person would be Musk. He’d have to show how the government’s censoring of the free speech on his site has negatively impacted the number of followers, and hence revenues.Someone or group has to have been affected by it before it can go before SCOTUS.
Or like "illegals" became "undocumented" and civil discourse became racist talk by the liberals?You mean like the anti-abortion movement changed their name to “right to life” movement. “Death penalty” was changed to “Capital Punishment”?
The Right to Life folks believe in both war and “capital punishment”
….and that person would be Musk. He’d have to show how the government’s censoring of the free speech on his site has negatively impacted the number of followers, and hence revenues.
None of us care what you claim as it is continually stupid.None of you can beat me in a debate.
Or like "illegals" became "undocumented" and civil discourse became racist talk by the liberals?
None of you can beat me in a debate.