The Dems' Desperation To Rewrite History

[Uncensored2008]

While I can easily show you a dope claiming Democrats took control of the Congress in 2006, I'd like to see you show someone claiming the history of Iraq started in 2003.........

The Khmer Rouge won the 2006 elections, and took control in January of 2007 - by October 2008, the economy was in shambles.

Coincidence?

Ask the FBI:
"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rampant fraud in the mortgage industry has increased so sharply that the FBI warned Friday of an 'epidemic' of financial crimes which, if not curtailed, could become 'the next S&L crisis.'"
CNN.com - FBI warns of mortgage fraud epidemic - Sep 17 2004

Wow, that's convincing...

 

[Kosh]

On another thread the far left shows they want to rewrite history and making sure that no history exists in Iraq before 2003.

 

[Antares]

S'ok, it is going to bite you in the as very soon.

Sure it is.

So you are one of the three people in the Country who thinks Dems will hang on to the Senate, got it.

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

 

[Faun]

While I can easily show you a dope claiming Democrats took control of the Congress in 2006, I'd like to see you show someone claiming the history of Iraq started in 2003.........

The Khmer Rouge won the 2006 elections, and took control in January of 2007 - by October 2008, the economy was in shambles.

Coincidence?

Ask the FBI:
"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rampant fraud in the mortgage industry has increased so sharply that the FBI warned Friday of an 'epidemic' of financial crimes which, if not curtailed, could become 'the next S&L crisis.'"
CNN.com - FBI warns of mortgage fraud epidemic - Sep 17 2004

Wow, that's convincing...

It still amazes me how rightards think one gay man from the minority had so much power, he could single-handedly stop the majority party Republicans from passing a finance reform bill which could have prevented the meltdown. Tell me, which bills did that mighty gay man block?

 

[Faun]

Sure it is.

So you are one of the three people in the Country who thinks Dems will hang on to the Senate, got it.

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

 

[Faun]

On another thread the far left shows they want to rewrite history and making sure that no history exists in Iraq before 2003.

Is that the same thread where you left your brain? No worries, I knew you couldn't prove your lie.

 

[The Rabbi]

So you are one of the three people in the Country who thinks Dems will hang on to the Senate, got it.

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

 

[Antares]

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

Faun indeed does.

 

[Antares]

So you are one of the three people in the Country who thinks Dems will hang on to the Senate, got it.

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

LOL, feel free to link it

I said exactly what I said that I said

 

[Faun]

I feel guilty for laughing at you Jester, as you are quite clearly senile.

Both parties threatened to invoke the nuclear option for the same reason -- the minority party was filibustering virtually every nominee. The difference is that when Democrats were the minority party, they worked with Republicans to prevent the need for the nuclear option. Whereas when the Republicans were the minority party, they refused to work with Democrats to prevent the nuclea4 option.

Digest that how you will.

But the funniest part of this conversation remains your abject idiocy in claiming that Frist backed down from using the nuclear option due to "integrity of the system."



No, moron, Frist backed down from the nuclear option because Democrats were willing to allow an up/down vote on some of Bush's nominees.

It isnt that you dont know anything. OK, it is that you dont anything.
Dems reneged on their agreement almost immediately.
Again it is simply patent: One side threatened but withdrew out of concern for the integrity of the process. The other side sought temporary political advantage and rammed it home.
And when the GOP takes the Senate what are the odds Democraps will demand they change it back?

They did not renege on the deal, you moron. You're too senile to know that. But then, that's to be expected of the imbecile who thinks Democrats took control of the Congress in 2006.

Yawn.
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
Carry on, moron.

Aww, how cute. The forum jester feigns boredom hoping no one will notice he can't prove his lie.

You wouldnt know the truth if it bit you. I proved my point over and over. That you are too stupid/ignorant to understand that is not my problem

The only point you proved over and over is that you're the biggest imbecile on this site. Regardless of your shortcomings, you idiotically claimed Frist backed down from the nuclear option due to "integrity of the system, " when in fact, he backed down following Democrats' willingness to not filibuster some of Bush's nominees.

But g'head ... make your "point" again, Jester

 

[Faun]

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

Full employment unemployment rate = 5.5%
Current unemployment rate = 5.9%

 

[The Rabbi]

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

Full employment unemployment rate = 5.5%
Current unemployment rate = 5.9%

The labor force participation rate is down to levels last seen during Carter's administration. The rate is low almost exclusively because people have stopped looking for work.
Typical of libs to cherry pick one or two data points and extrapolate something completely unwarranted out of it.
btw, during much of Bush's tenure we were actually close to full employment.

 

[Kosh]

On another thread the far left shows they want to rewrite history and making sure that no history exists in Iraq before 2003.

Is that the same thread where you left your brain? No worries, I knew you couldn't prove your lie.

The ol post bunk material and prove me wrong gag...

Typical far left poster..

hen again the far left continues to divert and show that they want the history of Iraq to start in 2003.

 

[Faun]

Here on planet Earth, nobody actually knows.

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

LOL, feel free to link it

I said exactly what I said that I said

HOSSFLY: "BFD. We have 6% unemployment too."

Faun: "That's not too far from full employment."

Antares: "Ours is 3.5"

Does Barack Obama Deserve A Third Term Page 11 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

It's your idiocy ... embrace it.

 

[Antares]

Most of us are willing to read the writing on the wall.
But by all means.....carry on in your delusion.

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

LOL, feel free to link it

I said exactly what I said that I said

HOSSFLY: "BFD. We have 6% unemployment too."

Faun: "That's not too far from full employment."

Antares: "Ours is 3.5"

Does Barack Obama Deserve A Third Term Page 11 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

It's your idiocy ... embrace it.

LOL, ok so you "proved" I said what I said I said.

Again you aren't real bright.

 

[Faun]

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

Full employment unemployment rate = 5.5%
Current unemployment rate = 5.9%

The labor force participation rate is down to levels last seen during Carter's administration. The rate is low almost exclusively because people have stopped looking for work.
Typical of libs to cherry pick one or two data points and extrapolate something completely unwarranted out of it.
btw, during much of Bush's tenure we were actually close to full employment.

Jester, the LFPR is not a measurement of the health of the job market. Almost the entire decline is due to people who don't want to work.

And you'll notice, no economist ever talked about it before 2009, even though it began declining around 2001.

 

[Faun]

Sure you are. Of course, last time I heard that, the idiot right was gleefully predicting a Romney victory. Hell, many on the right were even shell shocked when Romney lost. After all, how could their understanding of the polls be so wrong??

Face reality, the Senate is too close to call.

Of course, I'm suggesting that to the person who thinks the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%, so hopefully you can understand why I'm not so optimistic with you actually facing reality.

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

LOL, feel free to link it

I said exactly what I said that I said

HOSSFLY: "BFD. We have 6% unemployment too."

Faun: "That's not too far from full employment."

Antares: "Ours is 3.5"

Does Barack Obama Deserve A Third Term Page 11 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

It's your idiocy ... embrace it.

LOL, ok so you "proved" I said what I said I said.

Again you aren't real bright.

Yeah, you said the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%. Again ... your idiocy ... revel in it.

 

[The Rabbi]

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

If you think we are near full employment you have your head up your ass.

Full employment unemployment rate = 5.5%
Current unemployment rate = 5.9%

The labor force participation rate is down to levels last seen during Carter's administration. The rate is low almost exclusively because people have stopped looking for work.
Typical of libs to cherry pick one or two data points and extrapolate something completely unwarranted out of it.
btw, during much of Bush's tenure we were actually close to full employment.

Jester, the LFPR is not a measurement of the health of the job market. Almost the entire decline is due to people who don't want to work.

And you'll notice, no economist ever talked about it before 2009, even though it began declining around 2001.

LOL! No, it is due to people becoming discouraged and dropping out.
Are you really that dumb?

 

[Faun]

On another thread the far left shows they want to rewrite history and making sure that no history exists in Iraq before 2003.

Is that the same thread where you left your brain? No worries, I knew you couldn't prove your lie.

The ol post bunk material and prove me wrong gag...

Typical far left poster..

hen again the far left continues to divert and show that they want the history of Iraq to start in 2003.

Well I challenged you to prove your claim. You couldn't but thought you could bluff your way out of it by effectively saying, it's over there if you go look for it.

I'm merely pointing out to you how obvious your bluff is.

 

[Antares]

LOL, I said UE here if 3.5, you aren't real bright are you?

In response to me pointing out how the unemployment rate at is near the full employment unemployment rate, you denied that by claiming the full employment unemployment rate was 3.5%. It's your idiocy. Own it.

LOL, feel free to link it

I said exactly what I said that I said

HOSSFLY: "BFD. We have 6% unemployment too."

Faun: "That's not too far from full employment."

Antares: "Ours is 3.5"

Does Barack Obama Deserve A Third Term Page 11 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

It's your idiocy ... embrace it.

LOL, ok so you "proved" I said what I said I said.

Again you aren't real bright.

Yeah, you said the full employment unemployment rate is 3.5%. Again ... your idiocy ... revel in it.

You continue to show how bright you aren't honey.

Sorry.

Did you want to discuss the real UE rate....UE ?