Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Big Bamboozle was a mirthful clown show, but the farce has become intolerable to an increasing number of Republicans.We've thoroughly investigated ourselves and find us to be clean as the driven snow!
That's a really long-winded way to say "I got nothing", Sock-o.The Big Bamboozle was a mirthful clown show, but the farce has become intolerable to an increasing number of Republicans.
Personally, I think they should have run with the "nefarious Italian satellite" confection a bit longer.
there has been misinformation about his "audit"Yes, that's the way it is supposed to work. Of course the proclaimed winner of the contest won't spend a dime on it. Duh.
No, what they did was double and triple check that evidence for accuracy. The way a real investigation should go.
I know I'm wasting my breath saying this, but the story contained in your link stinks. Every other sentence contains emotional, leading and speculative phrases. Totally fake and bull shit. A factual news story doesn't need to rely on opinion pushing. I can see why it's appealing to weak minded people who can't understand facts but only pleas to emotional outbursts.
The story your link points to is, itself, a source of that misinformation. It's awful easy for pundits to sit back and type a few lines on a computer and press enter. It's quite another thing for someone to actually go out and do the hard work of investigating. Thousands of people were involved in that canvasing effort (not to be confused with the investigation carried out by the Arizona State Senate). Why doesn't your source interview any of those hard working people involved?there has been misinformation about his "audit"
Fact check: No evidence 'lost votes' or 'ghost votes' affected Arizona's election outcome
Local elections officials, media outlets and experts say the report is flawed.www.usatoday.com
finally. ty.Here you go:
Official, certified 2020 Maricopa County vote.
Two separate audits of the 2020 election in Maricopa County found that there were no issues with the county's voting machines or software, according to results released Tuesday by the Maricopa County Elections Department.
Auditing Elections Equipment In Maricopa County | Maricopa County, AZ
Maricopa County forensic audit results.www.maricopa.gov
because usa today consulted people with election auditing expertise, such as professor Philip Stark. He explained how their 61% response rate makes extrapolation meaningless. Or professor Brian Schaffner, who explains how Liz Harris's report just shows how people tell white-lies when answering surveys.The story your link points to is, itself, a source of that misinformation. It's awful easy for pundits to sit back and type a few lines on a computer and press enter. It's quite another thing for someone to actually go out and do the hard work of investigating. Thousands of people were involved in that canvasing effort (not to be confused with the investigation carried out by the Arizona State Senate). Why doesn't your source interview any of those hard working people involved?
www.azmirror.com
because usa today consulted people with election auditing expertise, such as professor Philip Stark. He explained how their 61% response rate makes extrapolation meaningless.
Or professor Brian Schaffner, who explains how Liz Harris's report just shows how people tell white-lies when answering surveys.
Another take it here
Voter 'canvass' features big allegations, zero evidence, outright falsehoods
Nestled against the foothills of Estrella Mountain Regional Park, a nearly 3,000-square-foot house sits on an allegedly vacant lot.
The election being rigged isn't a total surprise.Interesting. California just called the recall election with less than 25% of the responses counted.
Hilarious. Trump bum kissers cling to whatever shred of discredited crap serves their master's agenda.finally. ty.
And now, for the investigation results of what really took place, despite the prior "audits" that looked at less than 2% of the votes or ballots and did not look at the voter registration list at all...
[Drum Roll, Please...]
I know, I know, the law-breaking non-compliant non-meaningful idiots at Maricopa County are claiming those 74,243 were early voters. Too bad those are already accounted for in other tabulations. And even without those, the election results are a fraud.
That's a really long-winded way to say "I got nothing", Sock-o.
Paranoidal ideologues will, undoubtedly, rage against the People unambiguously registering their sentiment regarding recall in California but, if there were any doubt as to the legitimacy of the vote, hyper-partisan, disgruntled politicians in CA would be besieging the courts with challenges.California just called the recall election with less than 25% of the responses counted.
for CA recall, 74 percent were counted yesterdayInteresting. California just called the recall election with less than 25% of the responses counted.
So another attempt to discredit someone using some sort of guilt by association tactic? tsk tsk tsk.
While the fact that your source is a VERY NEW WEBSITE (only registered with IANA since 2018, after a suspected socialist took over as the Maricopa County recorder in 2016), it does seem to have a history of stories since late 2018, so I can't discredit the site entirely without doing a lot more research. Like, were ALL the THOUSANDS of stories really from the same two or three authors over the course of a couple years? seems dubious...very likely copied from AP news or other sources. Also noted is the fact that the site has no ads and their only apparent means of support is through a "subscription" link. Not possible. Somebody with deep pockets is funding them. I, myself, with very little funding, could reproduce a web site similar to that one, fill it up with a bunch of copied news articles, then start blabbing about whatever make-believe my sponsor wanted.
But lets dig into that story:
The first 4 paragraphs detail a specific incident where the reporter claims they located a house that they thought might go with an address that was reported as a vacant lot. The reporter did not use any specific lot identification numbers. From the picture shown, there does in fact appear to be a vacant lot in the middle of the development. I don't believe the reporters have anything. They did not report the details.
The story goes on to provide the authors opinion about the canvasing effort, interspersed with a few facts. The story claims that the report did not provide any names and addresses of problematic votes, so therefore the report can't be trusted (Notice I use the same qualifications above regarding the news reporters' claims in the first few paragraphs). Most likely, the sponsor of the effort is withholding the specifics out of confidentiality so that those who filed reports don't have greedy reporters crawling over their property.
The next paragraph: "Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer said Harris hasn’t provided any affidavits or other corroborating evidence to his office, either. " It neglects to state that Stephen Richer is a Democrat, and who's election in 2016 was surrounded by controversy. It also neglects to state that the canvas was a purely citizen sponsored effort, not bound by political expectations: Harris is under NO obligation to provide the democrat Richer any information whatsoever.
Not surprisingly, in the middle of the article is an advertisement for another story, something about the separate and unrelated Arizona Senate Audit. This is totally unlike any other article on the website. It makes you begin to wonder if the site has an agenda.
Then there is a section that details another specific incident concerning a mobile home park. The author claims that the park was sold in February 2020 and that there were in fact people living there at the time, but miraculously by 2021 all homes had been moved and the lot was in fact vacant. I don't know about y'all, but it seems fantastically unlikely dozens of families could have been uprooted in such a short time period. Especially with the pandemic going on, during which time it was almost impossible to move, let alone move entire households. The authors narrative is simply gobldy-gook and has no substance to refute the claim. On the contrary, the article states "Elections Department spokeswoman Megan Gilbertson told the Mirror that 15 people were previously registered to vote at that address."
The story goes on to talk about other allegations and conclusions of the Harris report. The only quote that denounces the result is from Richer (A DEMOCRAT ELECTED UNDER DUBIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES IN 2016). Furthermore, Harris has a long list of requests for public information filed with Richer's office which had not been fulfilled, according to the article itself.
I CALL BULL SHIT ON THAT ARTICLE.
This is really off topic anyway. The results are non-binding private citizen due diligence. They are damaging to Maricopa County, though. The canvasing that was done by the private citizens is separate from the real investigation that was done by the senate.
for CA recall, 74 percent were counted yesterday
The cover of Harris's report claimed that an address is Goodyear was a vacant log. But all the local officials and local news orgs found a residence at that address.
Harris says "an accidental typo led the team to list the wrong address on the cover report." and then the corrected address didnt have any ballots cast from it.
Harris never provided data to Maricopa County assesor or recorder, so what difference does it make that the recorder my be a democrat?
Since the topic of this thread is arizona election, its totally relevant
This is a great thing to advance. How could anyone not want to make elections more secure using this idea? Unless you know you can't win without cheating, like stuffing unsecured ballot boxes with plain paper Xerox copies of ballots.---AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem: Arizona Ballot Integrity Project – CURRENCY GRADE Fraud Measures – UV Reactive, QR Codes, Microprint, Holographic Watermark---
AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem: Arizona Ballot Integrity Project - CURRENCY GRADE Fraud Measures - UV Reactive, QR Codes, Microprint, Holographic Watermark | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem announced his Arizona Ballot Integrity Project on Saturday.www.thegatewaypundit.com
At least she's fighting for a good cause. She's on the side of the good guys.
But if the audit prove Biden shouldn't be president and if we could get Trump reinstated, everything would be fixed.AH just a reminder the election has been over for many months. You have been complaining about how the new president runs things for months, you can't have it both ways.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
