nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,965
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.