The eldest of the Duggar children resigns from FRC: Child Molestation Charges

[Silhouette]

Who really cares how Josh will view sex today and tomorrow, much less what his turn-ons are.

I would think many would, especially LEO, but I guess protecting future victims isn't your goal, just bashing a family. Got it. Thanks guy.

It was a calculated hit on Christians specifically. I think there should be legal blowback on those responsible...and no, I'm not talking about a 14 year old boy..

A stunning and very alarming report has emerged involving the Duggar family.

According to a recently uncovered police report, Josh Duggar, one of the many stars of TLC's 19 Kids and Counting, allegedly molested five girls — some of whom, were reportedly his sisters — starting in 2002. He was around 14 at the time...

So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age. And the father went to the police with the information and put his son through that and counselling too. Family ashamed, hesitant as to what to do/how to handle this boy's surging hormones and the girls who engaged with him too.. What a shocker. Newsflash, 14 year old boy can't control himself, gets in trouble with father/police. Has to go to counselling.

This is a smear story, of course. One wonders who it was who dug into the boy's juvenile record. Aren't those supposed to be sealed? I wonder who could be behind dethroning someone fighting for traditional marriage?

This will destroy the otherwise wholesome show "19 Kids and Counting" in more than just killing it on TLC, it will sully Christianity forever in the minds of millions of viewers. And this of course was the ultimate goal.

Christians aren't perfect people. In fact, they come to the church and cling to it because they know precisely that they aren't perfect and wish to improve their lives day by day under the watchful eye of God. You might have heard sermons referring to everyone as "a sinner"? That's because that's the premise that the entire religion works off of.

Meanwhile yesterday was "Harvey Milk Day" in California where millions of school kids were forced to idolize a serial pervert who, aging into his 40s, was preying on young teen boys on drugs, runaways, one after the other in a fixed and untreated, unapologetic, even boastful sexuality that's celebrated by LGBTs (the wolf pack that took down Josh Duggar) "across the nation and the world"..

If I was the family, I'd sue the Oprah Winfrey enterprise that "broke the story" (agreed to smear the Duggar boy/traditional marriage movement by association) for destroying Josh Duggar's reputation for what he did when he was a juvenile. I wonder what Oprah did as a juvenile and how would she react if it was used to completely destroy her financial enterprise?

Yep, I think she'd be suing ASAP.

 

[Papageorgio]

i wonder who the duggers will blame for the killing of the golden goose...the son or the victims....
as for the actions of the parents....i would do the same to protect my child...i would protect him from the law etc....seek counseling privately ...the one major thing i would not do.....sign up for a reality tv show


did they not know it would come out ....

and one has to just shake one's head at the fact the leo who counseled him is now serving time for child porn

The whole story is questionable, why come on TV as a super clean large family with this skeleton. Add pervert LEO as a mentor and counselors, you begin to wonder how screwed up Josh Duggar maybe.

I haven't seen any Christians claim that they are perfect. An important part of Christianity is repentance and forgiveness.

Perfection isn't the issue, the parents knew this issue when they started the show, it is pretty poor judgement and a lot of pressure on a family unit that had molestation already in their lives. Forgiveness is between them and GOD.

 

[Lilah]

A stunning and very alarming report has emerged involving the Duggar family.

According to a recently uncovered police report, Josh Duggar, one of the many stars of TLC's 19 Kids and Counting, allegedly molested five girls — some of whom, were reportedly his sisters — starting in 2002. He was around 14 at the time...

So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age. And the father went to the police with the information and put his son through that and counselling too. Family ashamed, hesitant as to what to do/how to handle this boy's surging hormones and the girls who engaged with him too.. What a shocker. Newsflash, 14 year old boy can't control himself, gets in trouble with father/police. Has to go to counselling.

This is a smear story, of course. One wonders who it was who dug into the boy's juvenile record. Aren't those supposed to be sealed? I wonder who could be behind dethroning someone fighting for traditional marriage?

This will destroy the otherwise wholesome show "19 Kids and Counting" in more than just killing it on TLC, it will sully Christianity forever in the minds of millions of viewers. And this of course was the ultimate goal.

Christians aren't perfect people. In fact, they come to the church and cling to it because they know precisely that they aren't perfect and wish to improve their lives day by day under the watchful eye of God. You might have heard sermons referring to everyone as "a sinner"? That's because that's the premise that the entire religion works off of.

Meanwhile yesterday was "Harvey Milk Day" in California where millions of school kids were forced to idolize a serial pervert who, aging into his 40s, was preying on young teen boys on drugs, runaways, one after the other in a fixed and untreated, unapologetic, even boastful sexuality that's celebrated by LGBTs (the wolf pack that took down Josh Duggar) "across the nation and the world"..

If I was the family, I'd sue the Oprah Winfrey enterprise that "broke the story" (agreed to smear the Duggar boy/traditional marriage movement by association) for destroying Josh Duggar's reputation for what he did when he was a juvenile. I wonder what Oprah did as a juvenile and how would she react if it was used to completely destroy her financial enterprise?


Yep, I think she'd be suing ASAP.

"So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age."
One of his victims is still a minor, so exactly what kind of experiment was Josh performing?
If a 14 year-old boy cannot control himself, how did you fare during that time in your life?
Since young sexy teachers are placed in prison for having consensual sex with their powerfully built male students,
doesn't it seem fair that sexy Josh should spend some time in jail for molesting a baby girl? Or is that your norm?
How were students forced to idolize Harvey Milk Day?

 

[Lilah]

Who really cares how Josh will view sex today and tomorrow, much less what his turn-ons are.

I would think many would, especially LEO, but I guess protecting future victims isn't your goal, just bashing a family. Got it. Thanks guy.

You have absolutely zero between your ears. It's a little late to psychoanalyze Josh Duggar, isn't it? If the goal was to protect future victims from his deviant proclivities, why wasn't the local law authorities involved?

 

[Silhouette]

"So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age."
One of his victims is still a minor, so exactly what kind of experiment was Josh performing?
If a 14 year-old boy cannot control himself, how did you fare during that time in your life?
Since young sexy teachers are placed in prison for having consensual sex with their powerfully built male students,
doesn't it seem fair that sexy Josh should spend some time in jail for molesting a baby girl? Or is that your norm?
How were students forced to idolize Harvey Milk Day?

There are reasons why police typically seal juvenile records. That is because kids do things without thinking first. By the time you are an adult, you are legally requird to think before you act. So that answers all the questions you just put out about women teachers hitting on their "powerfully built" minor students. That's because a teacher is legally required to know that a minor is off limits sexually. Their physical appearance completely shrouds the fact that mentally they are not fully formed yet. And THIS is the reason adults are legally required to keep their hands off.

Harvey Milk at 33 was legally required to know, for example, that the 16 year old minor, street waif on drugs, he was sodomizing and acting as "guardian" to at the same time was not allowed. There's a law in California mandating celebration by school kids of Harvey Milk on or around May 22 each year. Bill Text - SB-572 Harvey Milk Day official designation.

I was a mess at 14, as were many of the kids I grew up with (the tumultuous 1970s). If half the things we all did then were reported today if evil people dug into our juvenile accounts (the stuff that's published, not the stuff you did and got away with nobody knowing), we'd all be ruined/libelled.

Are your juvenile years filled with sweet innocence 100%? If not, why are you demanding that Josh Duggar's be?

 

[Papageorgio]

Who really cares how Josh will view sex today and tomorrow, much less what his turn-ons are.

I would think many would, especially LEO, but I guess protecting future victims isn't your goal, just bashing a family. Got it. Thanks guy.

You have absolutely zero between your ears. It's a little late to psychoanalyze Josh Duggar, isn't it? If the goal was to protect future victims from his deviant proclivities, why wasn't the local law authorities involved?

You are absolutely crazy, I wasn't there, I don't know why the authorities weren't called in until later. I stated that Josh needs to be checked out now, would you not agree? He could be a future threat, would you not agree? He is not on any sexual predator list so there should be an interest. Also he has children at home, should we protect them if he is a threat?

You can question what ifs, why nots, would of, could of, should of, the fact remains there is a possible threat in the future.

 

[Silhouette]

You are absolutely crazy, I wasn't there, I don't know why the authorities weren't called in until later. I stated that Josh needs to be checked out now, would you not agree? He could be a future threat, would you not agree? He is not on any sexual predator list so there should be an interest. Also he has children at home, should we protect them if he is a threat?

You can question what ifs, why nots, would of, could of, should of, the fact remains there is a possible threat in the future.

If Josh Duggar was sexually preying on 5 year olds when he was 14, then yes, there could be a problem. Sexually experimenting with kids his own age means he understands "age appropriate sex" at the very least, whether or not what he did was wrong at the time.

It sounds like you're angry that your smear campaign against Josh Duggar (traditional marriage and Christianity as a whole, also by association) isn't taking to the wings like you quite hoped it would?

 

[Lilah]

"So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age."
One of his victims is still a minor, so exactly what kind of experiment was Josh performing?
If a 14 year-old boy cannot control himself, how did you fare during that time in your life?
Since young sexy teachers are placed in prison for having consensual sex with their powerfully built male students,
doesn't it seem fair that sexy Josh should spend some time in jail for molesting a baby girl? Or is that your norm?
How were students forced to idolize Harvey Milk Day?

There are reasons why police typically seal juvenile records. That is because kids do things without thinking first. By the time you are an adult, you are legally requird to think before you act. So that answers all the questions you just put out about women teachers hitting on their "powerfully built" minor students. That's because a teacher is legally required to know that a minor is off limits sexually. Their physical appearance completely shrouds the fact that mentally they are not fully formed yet. And THIS is the reason adults are legally required to keep their hands off.

Harvey Milk at 33 was legally required to know, for example, that the 16 year old minor, street waif on drugs, he was sodomizing and acting as "guardian" to at the same time was not allowed. There's a law in California mandating celebration by school kids of Harvey Milk on or around May 22 each year. Bill Text - SB-572 Harvey Milk Day official designation.

I was a mess at 14, as were many of the kids I grew up with (the tumultuous 1970s). If half the things we all did then were reported today if evil people dug into our juvenile accounts (the stuff that's published, not the stuff you did and got away with nobody knowing), we'd all be ruined/libelled.

Are your juvenile years filled with sweet innocence 100%? If not, why are you demanding that Josh Duggar's be?

Anyone who would knowingly abuse a baby girl is, in my opinion, a sicko. And the public has every right to know what he did to those girls so they can keep their children away from him and people like him.
Do you honestly have a problem with warning the public about sexual deviants?

 

[Silhouette]

Anyone who would knowingly abuse a baby girl is, in my opinion, a sicko. And the public has every right to know what he did to those girls so they can keep their children away from him and people like him.
Do you honestly have a problem with warning the public about sexual deviants?

Josh Duggar was molesting "baby girls"? Or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age as a juvenile himself? There's a big legal difference. Especially if the girls involved were coercing him. I remember in Jr High it was the girls that were way more sexually aggressive than the boys.

Let me ask you this "Lilah"...are you against Harvey Milk molesting a "baby boy" (Jack McKinley) while Milk himself was 33 years old? Should we "warn the public" about people who know this about him and who worship him as a sex-icon anyway?

 

[Lilah]

Who really cares how Josh will view sex today and tomorrow, much less what his turn-ons are.

I would think many would, especially LEO, but I guess protecting future victims isn't your goal, just bashing a family. Got it. Thanks guy.

You have absolutely zero between your ears. It's a little late to psychoanalyze Josh Duggar, isn't it? If the goal was to protect future victims from his deviant proclivities, why wasn't the local law authorities involved?

You are absolutely crazy, I wasn't there, I don't know why the authorities weren't called in until later. I stated that Josh needs to be checked out now, would you not agree? He could be a future threat, would you not agree? He is not on any sexual predator list so there should be an interest. Also he has children at home, should we protect them if he is a threat?

You can question what ifs, why nots, would of, could of, should of, the fact remains there is a possible threat in the future.

Was Ariel Castro listed as a sexual predator? Was he a sexual predator?

 

[mdk]

You are absolutely crazy, I wasn't there, I don't know why the authorities weren't called in until later. I stated that Josh needs to be checked out now, would you not agree? He could be a future threat, would you not agree? He is not on any sexual predator list so there should be an interest. Also he has children at home, should we protect them if he is a threat?

You can question what ifs, why nots, would of, could of, should of, the fact remains there is a possible threat in the future.

If Josh Duggar was sexually preying on 5 year olds when he was 14, then yes, there could be a problem. Sexually experimenting with kids his own age means he understands "age appropriate sex" at the very least, whether or not what he did was wrong at the time.

It sounds like you're angry that your smear campaign against Josh Duggar (traditional marriage and Christianity as a whole, also by association) isn't taking to the wings like you quite hoped it would?

You should set up a Go Fund Me account in his name. How dare people levy criticism against a sexual predator! The nerve!

 

[Lilah]

Anyone who would knowingly abuse a baby girl is, in my opinion, a sicko. And the public has every right to know what he did to those girls so they can keep their children away from him and people like him.
Do you honestly have a problem with warning the public about sexual deviants?

Josh Duggar was molesting "baby girls"? Or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age?

Let's use a bit of logic: if he's now 27 and one of his victims is still a minor, was he abusing kids his own age?

 

[Silhouette]

You should set up a Go Fund Me account in his name. How dare people levy criticism against a sexual predator! The nerve!

Was he a sexual predator or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age? Were the girls coming on to him as Jr High girls typically are more sexually aggressive than the boys? Do you know any of this for a fact?

Do you also worship Harvey Milk? At least Duggar was experimenting sexually with girls around a year or two of his own age. Very different from taking advantage of them at 20 years younger than him when they were homeless and on drugs..

Also, would you want to share every single thing with the world you did at age 14 without your consent? This was a calculated hit on the traditional-marriage group Josh Duggar headed up. Just admit it. Come clean. Those responsible for destroying this family might be facing a lawsuit.

 

[Lilah]

You should set up a Go Fund Me account in his name. How dare people levy criticism against a sexual predator! The nerve!

Was he a sexual predator or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age? Were the girls coming on to him as Jr High girls typically are more sexually aggressive than the boys? Do you know any of this for a fact?

Do you also worship Harvey Milk? At least Duggar was experimenting sexually with girls around a year or two of his own age. Very different from taking advantage of them at 20 years younger than him when they were homeless and on drugs..

You are a sicko to even try and justify a rapist's behavior by blaming the victims, especially a baby girl.
Shame on you.

 

[Silhouette]

You are a sicko to even try and justify a rapist's behavior by blaming the victims, especially a baby girl.
Shame on you.

...says the LGBT member who worships Harvey Milk and who calls other 14 year olds "baby girls" as if she doesn't understand that Jr High girls are sexually menstruating and hormone charged as well as the boys that age.. What about the "baby boys" that Harvey Milk preyed on as he aged into his 40s Lilah?

What a sham you are "Lilah"...begone...

Understand the difference between same-aged sexual experimentation of juveniles vs 40 year olds sodomizing minor boys. Then get back to me..

 

[Papageorgio]

You are absolutely crazy, I wasn't there, I don't know why the authorities weren't called in until later. I stated that Josh needs to be checked out now, would you not agree? He could be a future threat, would you not agree? He is not on any sexual predator list so there should be an interest. Also he has children at home, should we protect them if he is a threat?

You can question what ifs, why nots, would of, could of, should of, the fact remains there is a possible threat in the future.

If Josh Duggar was sexually preying on 5 year olds when he was 14, then yes, there could be a problem. Sexually experimenting with kids his own age means he understands "age appropriate sex" at the very least, whether or not what he did was wrong at the time.

It sounds like you're angry that your smear campaign against Josh Duggar (traditional marriage and Christianity as a whole, also by association) isn't taking to the wings like you quite hoped it would?

I have liberals accusing me of excusing and minimizing Josh Duggar's actions. I have conservatives accusing me of bashing Christians.

I'm not smearing anyone, Josh Duggar has done a great job of smearing his own name.

I have not said anything in this thread about marriage, traditional or otherwise, so you are off base there.

I am a Christian, the Duggar's by covering it up means they aren't. The Christians need to distance themselves from them and let them heal. The Duggar's had other priorities to their own family, a TV show was not one of them.

If Josh had experimented fine, but I think he needs an evaluation for his sake and his children's sake. If he has a problem then he needs to address it.

 

[mdk]

You should set up a Go Fund Me account in his name. How dare people levy criticism against a sexual predator! The nerve!

Was he a sexual predator or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age? Were the girls coming on to him as Jr High girls typically are more sexually aggressive than the boys? Do you know any of this for a fact?

Do you also worship Harvey Milk? At least Duggar was experimenting sexually with girls around a year or two of his own age. Very different from taking advantage of them at 20 years younger than him when they were homeless and on drugs..

Also, would you want to share every single thing with the world you did at age 14 without your consent? This was a calculated hit on the traditional-marriage group Josh Duggar headed up. Just admit it. Come clean. Those responsible for destroying this family might be facing a lawsuit.

This is a wonderful example of how your claims to care about and protect children is complete and utter horse shit. Your biggest concern here isn't for the victims but damage control and spin.

 

[Papageorgio]

"So a 14 year old, a minor, was experimenting sexually with other minors around his age."
One of his victims is still a minor, so exactly what kind of experiment was Josh performing?
If a 14 year-old boy cannot control himself, how did you fare during that time in your life?
Since young sexy teachers are placed in prison for having consensual sex with their powerfully built male students,
doesn't it seem fair that sexy Josh should spend some time in jail for molesting a baby girl? Or is that your norm?
How were students forced to idolize Harvey Milk Day?

There are reasons why police typically seal juvenile records. That is because kids do things without thinking first. By the time you are an adult, you are legally requird to think before you act. So that answers all the questions you just put out about women teachers hitting on their "powerfully built" minor students. That's because a teacher is legally required to know that a minor is off limits sexually. Their physical appearance completely shrouds the fact that mentally they are not fully formed yet. And THIS is the reason adults are legally required to keep their hands off.

Harvey Milk at 33 was legally required to know, for example, that the 16 year old minor, street waif on drugs, he was sodomizing and acting as "guardian" to at the same time was not allowed. There's a law in California mandating celebration by school kids of Harvey Milk on or around May 22 each year. Bill Text - SB-572 Harvey Milk Day official designation.

I was a mess at 14, as were many of the kids I grew up with (the tumultuous 1970s). If half the things we all did then were reported today if evil people dug into our juvenile accounts (the stuff that's published, not the stuff you did and got away with nobody knowing), we'd all be ruined/libelled.

Are your juvenile years filled with sweet innocence 100%? If not, why are you demanding that Josh Duggar's be?

Anyone who would knowingly abuse a baby girl is, in my opinion, a sicko. And the public has every right to know what he did to those girls so they can keep their children away from him and people like him.
Do you honestly have a problem with warning the public about sexual deviants?

We don't know the ages of the girls that he molested, he fondled their breast so that leads me to believe that they were at least 12 or older. Of course we don't know because the ages were not released.

 

[Papageorgio]

You are a sicko to even try and justify a rapist's behavior by blaming the victims, especially a baby girl.
Shame on you.

...says the LGBT member who worships Harvey Milk and who calls other 14 year olds "baby girls" as if she doesn't understand that Jr High girls are sexually menstruating and hormone charged as well as the boys that age.. What about the "baby boys" that Harvey Milk preyed on as he aged into his 40s Lilah?

What a sham you are "Lilah"...begone...

Understand the difference between same-aged sexual experimentation of juveniles vs 40 year olds sodomizing minor boys. Then get back to me..

Milk is a sicko, to honor him is disgusting.

 

[mdk]

You should set up a Go Fund Me account in his name. How dare people levy criticism against a sexual predator! The nerve!

Was he a sexual predator or was he experimenting sexually with kids his own age? Were the girls coming on to him as Jr High girls typically are more sexually aggressive than the boys? Do you know any of this for a fact?

Do you also worship Harvey Milk? At least Duggar was experimenting sexually with girls around a year or two of his own age. Very different from taking advantage of them at 20 years younger than him when they were homeless and on drugs..

You are a sicko to even try and justify a rapist's behavior by blaming the victims, especially a baby girl.
Shame on you.

Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.