The eldest of the Duggar children resigns from FRC: Child Molestation Charges

Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

How is it possible for a 4 year-old baby girl to be on a peer level with a 14 year-old boy who is a rapist?
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

Huckabee has the political savvy of a Bulgarian shoe manufacturer, and is sabotaging his own campaign, in accordance with his usual success at utter failure.
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

How is it possible for a 4 year-old baby girl to be on a peer level with a 14 year-old boy who is a rapist?

What 4 year old girl?
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.

Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..

Yup, it is gay people's fault that Josh Duggars molested family members and others. This story has literally nothing to do with gay marriage but I am not shocked you think it does. All roads lead to gays with you, so why should this story be any different?
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

How is it possible for a 4 year-old baby girl to be on a peer level with a 14 year-old boy who is a rapist?

What 4 year old girl?

Good grief, can't you read?
If Josh is now 27 and one of his victims is still a minor, can you possibly extrapolate the baby's age when he molested her?
 
This is completely and utterly disgusting in every possible way:

josh_duggar.jpg

Josh Dugger: paragon of "Christian Virtue" by day, Child-molester by night.
Here he is, all wrapped in the flag, because that make him better or something. Go figure.​


Josh Duggar, the eldest of the 19 Duggar children from the very well known Duggar family, who worked for the "FRC" (Family Research Center), has resigned because of child molestation charges being leveled against him. He has already admitted that the charges are true.

The Dugga family became famous for the TV-reality show called "19 Kids and Counting".

First link:

Josh Duggar Responds to Child Molestation Allegations Yahoo Celebrity - Yahoo Celebrity

A stunning and very alarming report has emerged involving the Duggar family.

According to a recently uncovered police report,
Josh Duggar, one of the many stars of TLC's 19 Kids and Counting, allegedly molested five girls — some of whom, were reportedly his sisters — starting in 2002. He was around 14 at the time.

Josh, 27, issued a statement to People in response to the allegations: "Twelve years ago, as a young teenager, I acted inexcusably for which I am extremely sorry and deeply regret. I hurt others, including my family and close friends. I confessed this to my parents who took several steps to help me address the situation. We spoke with the authorities where I confessed my wrongdoing, and my parents arranged for me and those affected by my actions to receive counseling. I understood that if I continued down this wrong road that I would end up ruining my life."

He continued, "I would do anything to go back to those teen years and take different actions. I sought forgiveness from those I had wronged and asked Christ to forgive me and come into my life. In my life today, I am so very thankful for God's grace, mercy and redemption."

Josh has resigned as Executive Director of the Family Research Council.


This gets worse, much, much worse. His father knew about it, and did not inform the authorities.

Second link:

Duggar Family Spawn Family Research Council Top Lobbyist Resigns over Molestation Charges

The Duggars apparently told the elders of their church about the incidents in question but not local police authorities.

Later they claimed that they had sent Josh to a Christian counseling program to cure him of whatever was driving his abusive behavior. But under police questioning, Michele Duggar admitted that it wasn't a counseling program at all but rather "a guy they know in Little Rock that is remodeling a building."

The interviewing detective asked if the remodeling guy was a "mentor" and Duggar said "kind of."

What?

When Josh returned from his time with the mentor in Little Rock, father Jim Bob along with a group of church elders took Josh to talk to Arkansas State Trooper, Jim Hutchens, a personal friend of Jim Bob's. Hutchens took no official action and apparently made no report of the incident but rather had a "stern talk" with Josh.

Alas, former state trooper Hutchens is now serving hard time on child pornography charges. He was originally sent to prison two years after the stern talk, released and then convicted again in 2010. He is currently serving a 56 year term. So he may not have been the best person to have Josh talk to.


So, instead of reporting the sexual molestation to the authorities and then having LIED about sending him to a "christian" counseling program, instead, they sent him to a "mentor", a man who is now serving 56 years in jail because of child porn.

The father waited an ENTIRE YEAR to make a police report and then the incidents were quietly swept under the rug.

Third link:

Bombshell Duggar Police Report Jim Bob Duggar Didn t Report Son Josh s Alleged Sex Offenses For More Than a Year - In Touch Weekly

Jim Bob Duggar waited more than a year after his son, Josh, confessed to sexually molesting several female minors before contacting police, In Touch Magazine is reporting exclusively, based on information contained in the official police report.

What’s more, Jim Bob informed the elders of his church about Joshua’s actions and they waited three months before contacting authorities. The explosive new information is contained in a Springdale, Ark., police report obtained by In Touch magazine.

The report has been hidden since 2006 and was just obtained by the mag through a Freedom of information Act request. Jim Bob also refused to allow police to interview Josh when they opened a felony investigation in 2006. The Duggars star on TLC’s hit show 19 Kids and Counting.

In Touch magazine first broke the news of the Duggars’ underage sexual molestation scandal in this week’s magazine. (Note: Josh’s name is redacted from the police report but In Touch has confirmed the passages that refer to him.)


The police report is at the link.

This is absofuckinglutely disgusting!

Remember, this is a family that is held up for it's high "Christian" values. And Josh Duggar was the HEAD of the FRC. So much for the credibility of the FRC.

There is more.

This is a link from a very left-leaning site, but the links within are valid and they are corroborated. Fourth link:

9 Times Josh Duggar Lectured People On Family Values Before He Admitted He Was A Child Molester ThinkProgress

At the link are 9 examples of Josh Duggar lecturing others about family values, that gays were destroying America, that gays were sexual deviants, etc.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Duggar Family has been praised in many quarters for being a bastion of Christian Virtue and such, and yet, for the last 10 years, it has all been a big, fat lie.

Even here in USMB, the family has been praised to the high heavens above:

The Duggar Family Welcomes 18th Child US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

With comments like this:

They are an amazing family. They are one of the most loving and functional families I have ever seen. They are also very frugal and are financially secure (self-made).

Uhuh.....


The point is very clear. All too often, we hear from "Christian" charlatans that they take the higher moral road and then at the end of the day, we see yet again another sex scandal. Disgusting. And very, very predictable. If it's not a sex scandal, then it's a rip-off scheme. Go figure.

But I am not going to let The Right and The Christian Right conveniently forget about the many times it has claimed to take the high road, only to get caught in sexual perversions like this Dugger dude.

Here, to refresh our community's memory:

Category Christian sex abuse cases - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Category Christian clergy with criminal convictions - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

List of religious leaders convicted of crimes - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And with that third link, we see an enormous pattern:


  • Tony Alamo - Headed a Santa Clarita commune. Convicted of tax evasion in 1994 and then resided in a halfway house in Texarkana.[1] In 2009, he was convicted of ten federal counts of taking minors across state lines for sex, and sentenced to 150 years in federal prison.[2]
  • Wayne Bent (aka: Michael Travesser) - Founder of Lord Our Righteousness Church, sometimes called Strong City. Was convicted of one count of criminal sexual contact of a minor and two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor in 2008.[4] Was sentenced to 18 years with eight years suspended.[5]
  • William Kamm - An Australian religious sect leader and self-styled Pope Peter II who was sentenced to prison in October 2005 for a string of sexual attacks on a 15-year-old girl. In August 2007 his sentence was increased after being found guilty for a series of sexual abuses against another teenage girl over a five-year period.[10]
And then there's Jim and Tammy Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart (whores in his car), Ted Haggard (male prostitutes), George Rekers (rent boys!), not to mention hundreds and hundreds of catholic priests who have molested young boys.

Yes, we are seeing an enormous pattern. It is a pattern of sexual deviance and perversion, mostly swept under the rug, wrapped in the flag, "prayed away to Jesus" and all sorts of ridiculous shit, but at the end of the day, the story is the same: perversion committed by well-known so-called "Christians". And they are supposed to be 'better.' Yeah, right. My big toe has more morals than those yahoos.

I personally feel very, very sorry for "rank and file" Christians who really do try to live their lives according to the Bible, who go to church, who raise their families, who tithe, who are part of a community they care about - for they have to witness these charlatans and yahoos who abuse their religion for personal gain, all the while telling the rest of us that we are not moral enough.

Well, fuck that. I've had enough of that. I am personally sick and tired of being lectured by Christians by day over how morally superior they are, when they at night are either pumping pussy or sucking cock in a dark alley somewhere.

ENOUGH. IS. ENOUGH.

If Christians really, truly care about the message their faith us SUPPOSED to send, they should be screaming that the Duggars and the Robertsons and the Bakkers and the Swaggarts and the Haggards of the world get the hell out of their lives.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Discuss. Should the Duggars stay on TV, or should the show get canned?

Do you trust any Christian TV personalities at all?

I expect this will be a heated discussion and I do not apologize in the slightest for hitting on this Duggar asswipe so hard, because I bust my ass to teach my kid values and morals and I don't want a pervert like a Josh Duggar anywhere near my kid, to be sure.

He was 14 at the time.

Can't stand the show, don't care about them one way or another, didn't really read past that he was 14 at the time.
 
Lena Dunham admitted to raping her three year old sister growing up, but no outrage, she keeps here show and life goes on. I guess if you are a depraved liberal lesbo jew different standards apply.
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

Huckabee has the political savvy of a Bulgarian shoe manufacturer, and is sabotaging his own campaign, in accordance with his usual success at utter failure.

and so do you. but you sprinkle how some women are whores in yours
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

How is it possible for a 4 year-old baby girl to be on a peer level with a 14 year-old boy who is a rapist?

What 4 year old girl?

Good question, I have looked for the ages of the victims and none have been listed.
 
I have never heard of Lena Dunham. I Googled, "depraved liberal lesbo jew", and her name did not come up....
 
Lena Dunham admitted to raping her three year old sister growing up, but no outrage, she keeps here show and life goes on. I guess if you are a depraved liberal lesbo jew different standards apply.

And again, it's really doubtful that liberals are truly outraged this kid molested younger children, they're just gleeful they can use it to ruin a traditional American family.
 
Good grief, can't you read?
If Josh is now 27 and one of his victims is still a minor, can you possibly extrapolate the baby's age when he molested her?

OK, caught that in the UK article. If true, this is worse than I first thought. If so, I stand corrected. But until any trial or civil action, how can we convict him?

Lena Dunham admitted to raping her three year old sister growing up, but no outrage, she keeps here show and life goes on. I guess if you are a depraved liberal lesbo jew different standards apply.
And again, it's really doubtful that liberals are truly outraged this kid molested younger children, they're just gleeful they can use it to ruin a traditional American family.

100% agreed. Whereas the Duggars were shocked, shamed, disgusted etc. at their 14 year old's behavior, and tried in their own way to punish him and correct his behavior, a far left family would've patted this kid on the back and celebrated his sexual exploration. There's the difference in values.
 
Lena Dunham admitted to raping her three year old sister growing up, but no outrage, she keeps here show and life goes on. I guess if you are a depraved liberal lesbo jew different standards apply.

Would you provide a link to your accusation because that's not what Lena Dunham writes in her book.
 
I told you this thread would go FOR DAYS.

they haven't had a good OUTRAGE since last week. the majority of the people probably hasn't even heard about this. but they would damn sure make up their own minds on how they feel about it. not be this self righteous left on this board as if they have the morals of a SAINT

how pathetic
 
Last edited:
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

Huckabee has the political savvy of a Bulgarian shoe manufacturer, and is sabotaging his own campaign, in accordance with his usual success at utter failure.

and so do you. but you sprinkle how some women are whores in yours

Ok, Steph. I have told you to stop lying about my posts. I was going to get ugly with you if you did it again, but, decided that one who wrestles with pigs in shit do not improve their lot by doing so. Therefore, your ass is permanently on "ignore'. You can rant, lie, and roll in shit in your single wide, while waiting for your food stamps, all you want, for all I care. You don't exist.
 
Good grief, can't you read?
If Josh is now 27 and one of his victims is still a minor, can you possibly extrapolate the baby's age when he molested her?

OK, caught that in the UK article. If true, this is worse than I first thought. If so, I stand corrected. But until any trial or civil action, how can we convict him?

One more time, Josh Duggar admitted he molested the little girls. The parents conveniently waited until the statue of limitations had run out before they commented on their son's deviant behavior.
I for one do not understand why rape has a statute of limitations.
If you choose to support Josh Duggar that's your prerogative.
 
Good grief, can't you read?
If Josh is now 27 and one of his victims is still a minor, can you possibly extrapolate the baby's age when he molested her?

OK, caught that in the UK article. If true, this is worse than I first thought. If so, I stand corrected. But until any trial or civil action, how can we convict him?

One more time, Josh Duggar admitted he molested the little girls. The parents conveniently waited until the statue of limitations had run out before they commented on their son's deviant behavior.
I for one do not understand why rape has a statute of limitations.
If you choose to support Josh Duggar that's your prerogative.

So far, the only republican who does support them is Huckabee, but don't give up hope. A lot of them are not smart enough to dodge that bullet.
 
Sil's biggest concern here is how this makes the Family Research Council look.
Actually, my biggest concern is orchestrated smears by the LGBT machine in order to destroy the image of Christianity and its "all sinners welcome" foundation, based on the indiscretions of a 14 year old boy with his peer group. Also of concern is the use of a juvenile record to destroy an entire family who was struggling to bring values of "rising from the temptations of darkness" to millions of American viewers...all so they could use this libel as a shoehorn to sway the deliberating US Supreme Court to allow further debauchery around children..
...and Huckabee, bless his heart, is committing political suicide very early in the game by supporting the Duggars. Hell, he just lost even the prison population vote! In stir, the only people despised more than child molesters are cops and snitches!


Huckabee may just be seeing that a juvenile doing stupid things with his peers should not be fodder to destroy an entire family. Would Vandalshandle want his activities at 14 to be published in order to smear him legally today? Probably not. Same goes for the rest of you. This is the reason juvenile records are sealed.

If there are civil lawsuits from the peer girls who complained about Josh's actions, then their part (or lack of it) in the sexual contact, will be of public record. Until then the speculation is destroying the family.

How is it possible for a 4 year-old baby girl to be on a peer level with a 14 year-old boy who is a rapist?

What 4 year old girl?

Good question, I have looked for the ages of the victims and none have been listed.

I'll post in big font for you. If Josh is now 27 years-old, and one of his victims is still a minor, are you able to extrapolate her age when he molested her?
 

Forum List

Back
Top