The End Is Near....The Final Curtain

[jc456]

Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?

This nation was not founded by liberals. It was founded by businessmen who were tired of interference in their activities from a crown located abroad.

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

 

[RightyTighty]

Shame on your partisan unamerican behavior

only in fairyland dude, only in your fairyland. I see you can't accept the results either. it's why you are a blind.

The world is laughing at us for electing a self admitted Pussy Grabber who feels because he is an entitled star, they let him molest them (in reality it is fear that stops them from pursuing charges against the prick).

He is getting what he deserves. Will find out in 2018 how Americans feel about his duplicitous agenda.

He is a typical Republican con man who proclaims falsely that he won in a historic landslide and declares by that landslide he has a mandate to shove his elitist, unconstitutional agenda down the countries throats without regards to public opinion on the matters.

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

We accept it but don't have to like it or him

But you don't have to shoot Republican Congressmen....but that's what your side does.

The side that does that is the 'fucking nuts' side. They sure love their guns.

 

[Bush92]

Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?

This nation was not founded by liberals. It was founded by businessmen who were tired of interference in their activities from a crown located abroad.

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

You are trying. They wanted to severe ties with British Banks. Jefferson was always broke. Many of them owed money to banks in London. Break ties...debt is gone.

 

[Bush92]

Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?

This nation was not founded by liberals. It was founded by businessmen who were tired of interference in their activities from a crown located abroad.

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

More government = less liberty. Less government = more liberty

 

[BlindBoo]

Shame on your partisan unamerican behavior

Funny how things work out. Republicans promised more endless hours of investigation if Sec Clinton was elected. Now we have the most corrupt administration being investigated since RayGun, looking to not only destroy the legacy of the previous president but also to destroying the precedent the greatest generation set in motion after WWII. The world use to see us as a shinning light on the hill but now see us as a bottomless pit of despair displayed by seething hatred for one another.

only in fairyland dude, only in your fairyland. I see you can't accept the results either. it's why you are a blind.

The world is laughing at us for electing a self admitted Pussy Grabber who feels because he is an entitled star, they let him molest them (in reality it is fear that stops them from pursuing charges against the prick).

He is getting what he deserves. Will find out in 2018 how Americans feel about his duplicitous agenda.

He is a typical Republican con man who proclaims falsely that he won in a historic landslide and declares by that landslide he has a mandate to shove his elitist, unconstitutional agenda down the countries throats without regards to public opinion on the matters.

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

well he did when the majority of electoral votes. sorry. see proves my point.

Actually your claim was that I and many other can't accept that "The Don" won the EC. I have no choice but to accept the EC vote. I fully accept that we have elected "The Great Grabby One". I look forward to 2018. I fully support the Democrats doing everything legally possible in Congress to stop them ramming their secretive partisan agenda down America's collective throat as if they have a mandate from the majority of the American people.

The end is not near, the circus will continue.

 

[jc456]

The world is laughing at us for electing a self admitted Pussy Grabber who feels because he is an entitled star, they let him molest them (in reality it is fear that stops them from pursuing charges against the prick).

He is getting what he deserves. Will find out in 2018 how Americans feel about his duplicitous agenda.

He is a typical Republican con man who proclaims falsely that he won in a historic landslide and declares by that landslide he has a mandate to shove his elitist, unconstitutional agenda down the countries throats without regards to public opinion on the matters.

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

We accept it but don't have to like it or him

But you don't have to shoot Republican Congressmen....but that's what your side does.

The side that does that is the 'fucking nuts' side. They sure love their guns.

then why did the leftist guy shoot up the repub congressmen? D'OH!!!

 

[AntonToo]

Why don't you go ahead show me calling Trump a racist, a commie or a nazi, or call all of you deplorable.

When you can't, do the right thing, retract and STFU.

why don't you do the right thing and accept the results of the election and condemn the hate from your party and their supporters?

I accept the result of the election and condemn the ridiculous hyper-partisanship and hate among both left and right wingers.

In fact right here on this board I've posted disagreement with lefty that was driving Trump-is-a-Nazi hyperbole.

Now that your silly dodge is put away, it is time to retract the false bullshit you are spreading about what I've said.

No, the brown buffoon before trump is the abominable stain. It will take years to undue the carnage that his admin brought upon the country.

See, unlike the orange buffoon Obama was born with his skin color so when you fault him for it you sound like a racist.

The carnage? You mean economic recovery, growth, now popular healthcare reform and high end-of-presidency approval with a solid place in history for his Presidency?

What the hell is your point? How does me calling Trump orange buffoon (which he is) prove what you said about me?

you claimed you didn't call anyone racist with your arguments concerning trump. well here is your quote:

" skin color so when you fault him for it you sound like a racist."

using insults to respond rather than debating is what I'm discussing. and BTW, orange buffoon is still an insult.

NOOO, what I said was that I didn't call TRUMP a racist (he just panders to them)

Certainly I WOULD call a racist those that ARE racist and on this board we have a few that openly embrace that label.

Nor did I EVER say that I don't insult. So again you are making shit up.

Time for that retract.

 

[RightyTighty]

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

We accept it but don't have to like it or him

But you don't have to shoot Republican Congressmen....but that's what your side does.

The side that does that is the 'fucking nuts' side. They sure love their guns.

then why did the leftist guy shoot up the repub congressmen? D'OH!!!

Because he's fucking nuts.

 

[jc456]

Shame on your partisan unamerican behavior

only in fairyland dude, only in your fairyland. I see you can't accept the results either. it's why you are a blind.

The world is laughing at us for electing a self admitted Pussy Grabber who feels because he is an entitled star, they let him molest them (in reality it is fear that stops them from pursuing charges against the prick).

He is getting what he deserves. Will find out in 2018 how Americans feel about his duplicitous agenda.

He is a typical Republican con man who proclaims falsely that he won in a historic landslide and declares by that landslide he has a mandate to shove his elitist, unconstitutional agenda down the countries throats without regards to public opinion on the matters.

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

well he did when the majority of electoral votes. sorry. see proves my point.

Actually your claim was that I and many other can't accept that "The Don" won the EC. I have no choice but to accept the EC vote. I fully accept that we have elected "The Great Grabby One". I look forward to 2018. I fully support the Democrats doing everything legally possible in Congress to stop them ramming their secretive partisan agenda down America's collective throat as if they have a mandate from the majority of the American people.

The end is not near, the circus will continue.

then stop with the popular vote bullshit, since we don't elect our presidents with that. He won the majority of electoral votes, he took 30 states, landslide.

 

[jc456]

why don't you do the right thing and accept the results of the election and condemn the hate from your party and their supporters?

I accept the result of the election and condemn the ridiculous hyper-partisanship and hate among both left and right wingers.

In fact right here on this board I've posted disagreement with lefty that was driving Trump-is-a-Nazi hyperbole.

Now that your silly dodge is put away, it is time to retract the false bullshit you are spreading about what I've said.

No, the brown buffoon before trump is the abominable stain. It will take years to undue the carnage that his admin brought upon the country.

See, unlike the orange buffoon Obama was born with his skin color so when you fault him for it you sound like a racist.

The carnage? You mean economic recovery, growth, now popular healthcare reform and high end-of-presidency approval with a solid place in history for his Presidency?

What the hell is your point? How does me calling Trump orange buffoon (which he is) prove what you said about me?

you claimed you didn't call anyone racist with your arguments concerning trump. well here is your quote:

" skin color so when you fault him for it you sound like a racist."

using insults to respond rather than debating is what I'm discussing. and BTW, orange buffoon is still an insult.

NOOO, what I said was that I didn't call TRUMP a racist (he just panders to them)

Certainly I WOULD call a racist those that ARE racist and on this board we have a few that openly embrace that label.

Nor did I EVER say that I never insult. So again you are making shit up.

Time for that retract.

there you go, way to step out and prove my point. saves me from going to other searches now. you are exactly what I said you were.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?

This nation was not founded by liberals. It was founded by businessmen who were tired of interference in their activities from a crown located abroad.

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

I don't believe it will help with that fool....he says things that are patently false, and that anyone would recognize as lies.

The first paragraph suggest that Liberals/Fascists imagine that only....ONLY....government can advance society.
That is the face of the lessons of history,where the result by Leftist control has resulted in over 100 million human beings slaughtered.

 

[PoliticalChic]

and so fking what, you wish to control the outcome right, or better yet, pissed because you couldn't. You can't see that the majority of americans didn't want what your side offered. dude, you can't accept it. and it is the point of this thread. you keep validating that.

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

We accept it but don't have to like it or him

But you don't have to shoot Republican Congressmen....but that's what your side does.

The side that does that is the 'fucking nuts' side. They sure love their guns.

then why did the leftist guy shoot up the repub congressmen? D'OH!!!

See what I mean about Loosey Lefty's posts?

 

[jc456]

He may have won the election but not with a majority of votes from the American people. I have no choice but to accept the EC outcome and look towards 2018 to take our country back from the GOP/Russian coalition.

We accept it but don't have to like it or him

But you don't have to shoot Republican Congressmen....but that's what your side does.

The side that does that is the 'fucking nuts' side. They sure love their guns.

then why did the leftist guy shoot up the repub congressmen? D'OH!!!

Because he's fucking nuts.

I agree obummer was.

 

[Hum Dinger]

This nation was not founded by liberals. It was founded by businessmen who were tired of interference in their activities from a crown located abroad.

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

More government = less liberty. Less government = more liberty

You mean like the liberty to enslave?

Or the liberty to destroy the environment and poison people?

The liberty of the economically advantaged to take full advantage of the economically disadvantaged?

Those types of liberties?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

....may very well be an Iron Curtain.
America, it seems, no longer turns out Americans.


1. The century that the Left has spent engineering their take-over of the nation has, one must admit, been well planned and effective. Their 'Fifth Column' has not been the military, it has been academia, the judiciary and the media. And the bombardment by those 'troops' has been unmitigated and interminable.

2. The American philosopher George Santayana warned about not studying history, but many fail to see last month or last week as 'history.' Case in point, Britain's most recent election.....it is America in the mirror.

By the slimmest of margins, Britain avoided putting a Marxist in power:

"The 68-year-old Corbyn has applauded the evil totalitarian regimes of Chavez in Venezuela and Castro in Cuba. He praised Irish republican terrorism even while IRA bombers killed innocent civilians and servicemen on the streets of Britain (and tried, thankfully without success, to murder Margaret Thatcher). He has called Hamas his "friends." He tolerates anti-Semitism with worrying regularity even among those closest to him.

He has opposed every single measure aimed at strengthening security and enabling the security services and police to defeat Islamic terrorism. He supports state ownership of utilities and confiscatory levels of taxation on the middle classes.

How has this swivel-eyed extremist found himself so close to power? Here, simply, is what went wrong: By contrast, Corbyn came across as authentic and passionate, campaigning with zeal for causes he has believed in for decades (even if they are bonkers and unaffordable).

• Jeremy Corbyn promised voters unheralded amounts of "free stuff" even by the standards of profligate leftists, safe in the knowledge that he would not have to deliver on those unaffordable promises. The most notable – free college education for all – invigorated young voters who had stayed at home during last year’s Brexit referendum. One college town, Canterbury, swung to Labour for the first time in over 100 years.

...kids are force fed enough leftist bilge as it is by their professors and our mainstream media. They need to hear an alternative viewpoint and have been denied it for too long. How An Extreme Marxist Just Nearly Became British Prime Minister




3. Had not the corrupt Democrat Party cut the knees out from under Bernie Sanders, he might well have been our Jeremy Corbyn, and our well-trained government school grads would have been casting votes for Karl Marx over Thomas Jefferson.

One such 'American:"
'now I have not a patriotic bone in my body'
Now....On To The Future!

and this from the same fool:

'Of course I will admit I don't have a patriotic bone in my body eventhough i was born in america'
The pledge



And this....
A 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the wordsocialism. Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't



The end of our noble experiment....as near as the next election.

Who is it Mueller's investigating again? What'shisface...the guy with the yellow fuzzy blade on his head and all those Russian Rubles in his bank account.

 

[jc456]

....may very well be an Iron Curtain.
America, it seems, no longer turns out Americans.


1. The century that the Left has spent engineering their take-over of the nation has, one must admit, been well planned and effective. Their 'Fifth Column' has not been the military, it has been academia, the judiciary and the media. And the bombardment by those 'troops' has been unmitigated and interminable.

2. The American philosopher George Santayana warned about not studying history, but many fail to see last month or last week as 'history.' Case in point, Britain's most recent election.....it is America in the mirror.

By the slimmest of margins, Britain avoided putting a Marxist in power:

"The 68-year-old Corbyn has applauded the evil totalitarian regimes of Chavez in Venezuela and Castro in Cuba. He praised Irish republican terrorism even while IRA bombers killed innocent civilians and servicemen on the streets of Britain (and tried, thankfully without success, to murder Margaret Thatcher). He has called Hamas his "friends." He tolerates anti-Semitism with worrying regularity even among those closest to him.

He has opposed every single measure aimed at strengthening security and enabling the security services and police to defeat Islamic terrorism. He supports state ownership of utilities and confiscatory levels of taxation on the middle classes.

How has this swivel-eyed extremist found himself so close to power? Here, simply, is what went wrong: By contrast, Corbyn came across as authentic and passionate, campaigning with zeal for causes he has believed in for decades (even if they are bonkers and unaffordable).

• Jeremy Corbyn promised voters unheralded amounts of "free stuff" even by the standards of profligate leftists, safe in the knowledge that he would not have to deliver on those unaffordable promises. The most notable – free college education for all – invigorated young voters who had stayed at home during last year’s Brexit referendum. One college town, Canterbury, swung to Labour for the first time in over 100 years.

...kids are force fed enough leftist bilge as it is by their professors and our mainstream media. They need to hear an alternative viewpoint and have been denied it for too long. How An Extreme Marxist Just Nearly Became British Prime Minister




3. Had not the corrupt Democrat Party cut the knees out from under Bernie Sanders, he might well have been our Jeremy Corbyn, and our well-trained government school grads would have been casting votes for Karl Marx over Thomas Jefferson.

One such 'American:"
'now I have not a patriotic bone in my body'
Now....On To The Future!

and this from the same fool:

'Of course I will admit I don't have a patriotic bone in my body eventhough i was born in america'
The pledge



And this....
A 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the wordsocialism. Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't



The end of our noble experiment....as near as the next election.

Who is it Mueller's investigating again? What'shisface...the guy with the yellow fuzzy blade on his head and all those Russian Rubles in his bank account.

not to anyone's knowledge.Comey stated such under oath. thanks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

More government = less liberty. Less government = more liberty

You mean like the liberty to enslave?

Or the liberty to destroy the environment and poison people?

The liberty of the economically advantaged to take full advantage of the economically disadvantaged?

Those types of liberties?

Enslave????


Slave
noun
historical
1.a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them.
Google

Reality is defined by actions, not by words....soooo....if current Democrat royalty behaved as though slavery was their right.....it would prove everything this thread claims.
Is it possible that the current champion of the Democrat Party.....the current Democrat Party.....was copacetic with having slaves????
Having a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them?????

You betcha'!!!!


2. "Hillary Clinton Accused of Using ‘Convicted Murderer Slaves’ To Serve Her in Governor’s Mansion
When we moved in, I was told that using prison labor at the governor’s mansion was a longstanding tradition, which kept down costs, and I was assured that the inmates were carefully screened. I was also told the onetime murders were far the preferred security risks.

I saw and learned a lot as I got to know them better. We enforced rules strictly and sent back to prison any inmate who broke a rule.

....over the years we lived there, we became friendly with a few of them, African-American men ....

maple cocaine @historyinflicks
Me: Bill & Hillary Clinton had slaves

Lib: They weren't slaves! They were prisoners learning a vocation

Me: What vocation?

Lib: Servitude

4:52 AM - 7 Jun 2017"
Hillary Clinton Accused of Using ‘Convicted Murderer Slaves’ To Serve Her in Governor’s Mansion





3. Oh....BTW....did I mention that the Democrat Party is now, and has always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship?

 

[jc456]

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

More government = less liberty. Less government = more liberty

You mean like the liberty to enslave?

Or the liberty to destroy the environment and poison people?

The liberty of the economically advantaged to take full advantage of the economically disadvantaged?

Those types of liberties?

You mean like the liberty to enslave?
Democrats

Or the liberty to destroy the environment and poison people?
like the fascists? Democrat
The liberty of the economically advantaged to take full advantage of the economically disadvantaged?
like the rich democrats?

Seems like a common theme there bubba. thanks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....may very well be an Iron Curtain.
America, it seems, no longer turns out Americans.


1. The century that the Left has spent engineering their take-over of the nation has, one must admit, been well planned and effective. Their 'Fifth Column' has not been the military, it has been academia, the judiciary and the media. And the bombardment by those 'troops' has been unmitigated and interminable.

2. The American philosopher George Santayana warned about not studying history, but many fail to see last month or last week as 'history.' Case in point, Britain's most recent election.....it is America in the mirror.

By the slimmest of margins, Britain avoided putting a Marxist in power:

"The 68-year-old Corbyn has applauded the evil totalitarian regimes of Chavez in Venezuela and Castro in Cuba. He praised Irish republican terrorism even while IRA bombers killed innocent civilians and servicemen on the streets of Britain (and tried, thankfully without success, to murder Margaret Thatcher). He has called Hamas his "friends." He tolerates anti-Semitism with worrying regularity even among those closest to him.

He has opposed every single measure aimed at strengthening security and enabling the security services and police to defeat Islamic terrorism. He supports state ownership of utilities and confiscatory levels of taxation on the middle classes.

How has this swivel-eyed extremist found himself so close to power? Here, simply, is what went wrong: By contrast, Corbyn came across as authentic and passionate, campaigning with zeal for causes he has believed in for decades (even if they are bonkers and unaffordable).

• Jeremy Corbyn promised voters unheralded amounts of "free stuff" even by the standards of profligate leftists, safe in the knowledge that he would not have to deliver on those unaffordable promises. The most notable – free college education for all – invigorated young voters who had stayed at home during last year’s Brexit referendum. One college town, Canterbury, swung to Labour for the first time in over 100 years.

...kids are force fed enough leftist bilge as it is by their professors and our mainstream media. They need to hear an alternative viewpoint and have been denied it for too long. How An Extreme Marxist Just Nearly Became British Prime Minister




3. Had not the corrupt Democrat Party cut the knees out from under Bernie Sanders, he might well have been our Jeremy Corbyn, and our well-trained government school grads would have been casting votes for Karl Marx over Thomas Jefferson.

One such 'American:"
'now I have not a patriotic bone in my body'
Now....On To The Future!

and this from the same fool:

'Of course I will admit I don't have a patriotic bone in my body eventhough i was born in america'
The pledge



And this....
A 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the wordsocialism. Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't



The end of our noble experiment....as near as the next election.

Who is it Mueller's investigating again? What'shisface...the guy with the yellow fuzzy blade on his head and all those Russian Rubles in his bank account.

"Who is it Mueller's (sic) investigating again?"



This would be a good time to remind all that Deep State is not to be trusted.



1. In December, unnamed intelligence sources told the Washington Post that Russia helped Donald Trump win the presidency

2. A week later, senior intelligence sources told NBC News that Putin personally was involved in helping Trump win.

3. In February current and former officials released the details of a phone call between incoming national security adviser Mike Flynn and Russian ambassador Kislyak. The call was monitored because the Russian ambassador was being spied on, and Flynn's name should have been concealed.. but was unmasked and then leaked.

4. Trump's private phone call with the President of Mexico was surveilled by intell and then leaked.

5. His call with the Australian Prime Minister, also surveilled and then leaked.

6. His call with Vladimir Putin, again, leaked by the intell community.

7. Their job is to advance American national security....none of the above fits that description.

On the contrary, it was entirely political.

8. In fact, in March, a half dozen current and former intell officials told the NYTimes how they'd decide to spread classified information about the Trump campaign as widely as possible throughout government, so as to insure that it would eventually leak.

9. These people's job is to safeguard that intelligence, to hold information secret, not use them for political reasons.....and with enormous power goes...or should go....enormous responsibility.

10. Their job is to keep us safe from foreign threats.....not to pick our political leaders.
Tucker Carlson

 

[Bush92]

Founded by liberals based on - liberalism. You can't change the history.

Stop lying the memorializing of America's founding was based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


You and every totalitarian demand the bending of the knee and the neck to big government....this:
. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



But....I certainly hope you continue to make your lies this easy to obliterate.

Communism, National Socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....all have a the central doctrine:
"....an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature...."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Individualism and limited government are liberalism, little dummy.

are you for real? Let me help you.

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

"Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems."

More government = less liberty. Less government = more liberty

You mean like the liberty to enslave?

Or the liberty to destroy the environment and poison people?

The liberty of the economically advantaged to take full advantage of the economically disadvantaged?

Those types of liberties?

If America is so bad go to North Korea...stop trying to make a communist state here.