bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 67,044
They can have "civil unions" all they want but "marriage" is religious in nature...
Honestly I could care less what gays do - there is nothing stopping them from consortium so what the fuck is their problem???
There is nothing that states a man and a man or a woman and a woman can't engage in civil contract...
Besides, Loving v Virginia was about race not sexuality.
The only reason why "Jim Crow laws" even existed is because there was nothing in the Constitution that precisely forbid them... But that is an entirely different debate (if it matters I believe the Bill of Rights within itself made Jim Crow laws illegal in the first place).
So those who are married by a Justice of the Peace are not really married to you.
Absolutely NOT - that is called a consortium, or civil union....
They're contractually bound in the eyes of the government, not in the eyes of God.
Like I have said previously - marriage is used extremely loosely these days.
How odd, all those laws, statutes, etc. that call them MARRIAGES. So you are saying those statutes, laws, etc. are WRONG?