Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where's the outrage? Why aren't they DEMANDING change from their Bishops and Cardinals?
Here in SoCal, Cardinal Mahoney does nothing but cover up, cover up, protect protect....and NOTHING from the laity. Nothing from the Catholic League. Nothing from the Knights of Columbus.
here's some shocking news for you; the catholic league and the knights of columbus represent a very small percentage of the catholic laity.
Of course...that excuses their silence on the matter. Thank you for clearing that up, del.
Now go buy a fucking dictionary from 1975.........
Up until tyrannical progressives started redefining words "marriage" has been DEFINED as a union between a man and a woman.
You fucking evildoers have a hobby of redefining words....
Hell you fucks have the audacity to call yourselves "liberal." I will never refer to one of you commie bastards as "liberal."
As a matter of fact if you were so fucking liberal you would be thinking why is government involved in "marriage" in the first place (like I am).
you're giving doorknobs a bad name, nicky.
Are you saying words aren't being redefined??
I don't even understand how a word can even be redefined....
Words have an original definition (or are homonyms) and anything outside of that is slang...
the laity didn't excuse it and does not excuse it.
pull your head out of your ass, bigot.
The desire to see all Americans with equal standing under the law is NOT bigotry. It is the vision set forth in the Constitution.
try to keep UP, otay?
Name a law that SCOTUS ever wrote.
You're the one that claimed the SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage" or at least justified it.
How the FUCK can they do that considering marriage isn't part of the Bill of Rights or the other 17 amendments???
I did? When did I say that SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage"? Show my post that said that.
you're giving doorknobs a bad name, nicky.
Are you saying words aren't being redefined??
I don't even understand how a word can even be redefined....
Words have an original definition (or are homonyms) and anything outside of that is slang...
here's a word and a definition for you, nicky.
idiot=you
carry on
Are you saying words aren't being redefined??
I don't even understand how a word can even be redefined....
Words have an original definition (or are homonyms) and anything outside of that is slang...
here's a word and a definition for you, nicky.
idiot=you
carry on
Go listen to your Michal Medved and put me on your ignore list.....
Name a law that SCOTUS ever wrote.
You're the one that claimed the SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage" or at least justified it.
How the FUCK can they do that considering marriage isn't part of the Bill of Rights or the other 17 amendments???
I did? When did I say that SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage"? Show my post that said that.
You're the one that claimed the SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage" or at least justified it.
How the FUCK can they do that considering marriage isn't part of the Bill of Rights or the other 17 amendments???
I did? When did I say that SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage"? Show my post that said that.
You claimed "loving vs Virginia" did you not???
You're basically asserting that gays are a race hence justification and that case has been used several times as "justification."
They are being denied equal treatment under the law.
And spare me the "they have the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex as everyone else" nonsense.
No they are not... Or two Sisters are who Care for a Child.
Fact not Fiction.
Marriage isn't whatever anyone says it is, otherwise it's a Wide Open Door.
peace...
The desire to see all Americans with equal standing under the law is NOT bigotry. It is the vision set forth in the Constitution.
try to keep UP, otay?
Otay? Okey Dokey. The Church has been perceived by some as not doing enough; in perspective however, compare the number of pedophile priests in the Catholic Church worldwide. No more or less than most other groups of that size.
They are being denied equal treatment under the law.
And spare me the "they have the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex as everyone else" nonsense.
No they are not... Or two Sisters are who Care for a Child.
Fact not Fiction.
Marriage isn't whatever anyone says it is, otherwise it's a Wide Open Door.
peace...
Correct.
Marriage exists exactly as defined by a states marriage law.
try to keep UP, otay?
Otay? Okey Dokey. The Church has been perceived by some as not doing enough; in perspective however, compare the number of pedophile priests in the Catholic Church worldwide. No more or less than most other groups of that size.
It's the covering up....it's the moving them around for YEARS with no heads up to the new parish. That is DISGUSTING! Let me say it again....DISGUSTING!
I did? When did I say that SCOTUS "legalized gay marriage"? Show my post that said that.
You claimed "loving vs Virginia" did you not???
You're basically asserting that gays are a race hence justification and that case has been used several times as "justification."
Loving v Virginia stated that Marriage is a fundamental right. You have a problem with that obviously. Explain why you think that people should not have the right to marry.
You claimed "loving vs Virginia" did you not???
You're basically asserting that gays are a race hence justification and that case has been used several times as "justification."
Loving v Virginia stated that Marriage is a fundamental right. You have a problem with that obviously. Explain why you think that people should not have the right to marry.
They can have "civil unions" all they want but "marriage" is religious in nature...
Honestly I could care less what gays do - there is nothing stopping them from consortium so what the fuck is their problem???
There is nothing that states a man and a man or a woman and a woman can't engage in civil contract...
Besides, Loving v Virginia was about race not sexuality.
No they are not... Or two Sisters are who Care for a Child.
Fact not Fiction.
Marriage isn't whatever anyone says it is, otherwise it's a Wide Open Door.
peace...
Correct.
Marriage exists exactly as defined by a states marriage law.
Marriage existed before States existed, you stupid ass.
Otay? Okey Dokey. The Church has been perceived by some as not doing enough; in perspective however, compare the number of pedophile priests in the Catholic Church worldwide. No more or less than most other groups of that size.
It's the covering up....it's the moving them around for YEARS with no heads up to the new parish. That is DISGUSTING! Let me say it again....DISGUSTING!
and that had nothing to do with the catholic laity, hypocrite.
You claimed "loving vs Virginia" did you not???
You're basically asserting that gays are a race hence justification and that case has been used several times as "justification."
Loving v Virginia stated that Marriage is a fundamental right. You have a problem with that obviously. Explain why you think that people should not have the right to marry.
They can have "civil unions" all they want but "marriage" is religious in nature...
Honestly I could care less what gays do - there is nothing stopping them from consortium so what the fuck is their problem???
There is nothing that states a man and a man or a woman and a woman can't engage in civil contract...
Besides, Loving v Virginia was about race not sexuality.
The only reason why "Jim Crow laws" even existed is because there was nothing in the Constitution that precisely forbid them... But that is an entirely different debate (if it matters I believe the Bill of Rights within itself made Jim Crow laws illegal in the first place).
Loving v Virginia stated that Marriage is a fundamental right. You have a problem with that obviously. Explain why you think that people should not have the right to marry.
They can have "civil unions" all they want but "marriage" is religious in nature...
Honestly I could care less what gays do - there is nothing stopping them from consortium so what the fuck is their problem???
There is nothing that states a man and a man or a woman and a woman can't engage in civil contract...
Besides, Loving v Virginia was about race not sexuality.
nigga, please
Loving v Virginia stated that Marriage is a fundamental right. You have a problem with that obviously. Explain why you think that people should not have the right to marry.
They can have "civil unions" all they want but "marriage" is religious in nature...
Honestly I could care less what gays do - there is nothing stopping them from consortium so what the fuck is their problem???
There is nothing that states a man and a man or a woman and a woman can't engage in civil contract...
Besides, Loving v Virginia was about race not sexuality.
The only reason why "Jim Crow laws" even existed is because there was nothing in the Constitution that precisely forbid them... But that is an entirely different debate (if it matters I believe the Bill of Rights within itself made Jim Crow laws illegal in the first place).
So those who are married by a Justice of the Peace are not really married to you.
It's the covering up....it's the moving them around for YEARS with no heads up to the new parish. That is DISGUSTING! Let me say it again....DISGUSTING!
and that had nothing to do with the catholic laity, hypocrite.
Not hearing that much in the way of demands that the Catholic Church clean its act up...are you? Mostly those complaining are the victims, their families, and civil authorities.
